The Student Room Group

history is written by the victors?

Scroll to see replies

History is written by historians. Historical documents and are written by a wide range of people. The past is a state of facts historians are trying to understand by engaging with the methodology of study "History".


Seriously, this is the crappiest cliche ever. Only people who have no idea about what history actually is parrot it (oh and postmodernists, but their arguments are slightly more sophisticated), it only works if your view of the subject is that of contemporary people/historians at the time writing what happened and historians find those documents and repeat what they say. If you a STEM supremacist, then it sounds plausible. But if you can actually think, then it is nonsense.
Original post by the bear
it is very true. for example all we know of the British Druids is the reports of how the Romans beat them in battle and eventually exterminated them in Anglesey.


They weren't writing "History". They were writing documents which historians use to study the time. Maybe the evidence isn't good enough to have an accurate picture; that's nothing to do with the "Victors" writing history.
Original post by TheHistorian19
Incorrect. For the battle of Agincourt the most used primary accounts were written by Monstrelet and Le Fevre - both French men, i.e not victors. This is to name one example, I could name countless others for you though.


I think its a matter of definition. Victors are emperors or people with a high position in military in my point of view. History is written by victors whenever such people changed the social order or were successful in wars. Metternich and the other rulers at the Congress of Vienne who were responsible for restoration, Napoleon Bonaparte and his campaign against Italy, Bismarck and his successful wars against Denmark, France and Austria to establish the first German Reich - they are examples for victors indeed.

But what is about Storming of the Bastille, an historical event which was initiated by people? the German Revolution of 1918-19 which were caused by workers, sailors and soldiers? not forget to mention the fall of the Berlin wall by people in GDR. Can these people be counted as victors? no, I don't think so, as they were no monarchs or people with enormous influence in military. Nevertheless it is a part of history. Written history is everything what was done or happened in the past. In my opinion.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by KingStannis
History is written by historians. Historical documents and are written by a wide range of people. The past is a state of facts historians are trying to understand by engaging with the methodology of study "History".


Seriously, this is the crappiest cliche ever. Only people who have no idea about what history actually is parrot it (oh and postmodernists, but their arguments are slightly more sophisticated), it only works if your view of the subject is that of contemporary people/historians at the time writing what happened and historians find those documents and repeat what they say. If you a STEM supremacist, then it sounds plausible. But if you can actually think, then it is nonsense.


Couldn't agree more, this is exactly what I've been trying to say but in much better words though.

I wouldn't agree with your views on postmodernism though, I tend to agree with this strand of thought more than others - I find that revisionism is often to academicaly concerned and isn't very 'real', if you follow.
Original post by TheHistorian19
Couldn't agree more, this is exactly what I've been trying to say but in much better words though.

I wouldn't agree with your views on postmodernism though, I tend to agree with this strand of thought more than others - I find that revisionism is often to academicaly concerned and isn't very 'real', if you follow.


I fundamentally believe that scientific and historical methods produce accurate knowledge. I haven't read much postmodernism though.
Original post by KingStannis
I fundamentally believe that scientific and historical methods produce accurate knowledge. I haven't read much postmodernism though.


I've only read post revisionism in case of the English Civil War, Vendee Civil War, French Revolution and a few others...but it seems convincing.

This whole 'victor dimension' in history is just very amature - GCSE stuff.
Original post by Kallisto
I think its a matter of definition. Victors are emperors or people with a high position in military in my point of view. History is written by victors whenever such people changed the social order or were successful in wars. Metternich and the other rulers at the Congress of Vienne who were responsible for restoration, Napoleon Bonaparte and his campaign against Italy, Bismarck and his successful wars against Denmark, France and Austria to establish the first German Reich - they are examples for victors indeed.

But what is about Storming of the Bastille, an historical event which was initiated by people? the German Revolution of 1918-19 which were caused by workers, sailors and soldiers? not forget to mention the fall of the Berlin wall by people in GDR. Can these people be counted as victors? no, I don't think so, as they were no monarchs or people with enormous influence in military. Nevertheless it is a part of history. Written history is everything what was done or happened in the past. In my opinion.


Well done - history is "everything [that] was done or happened in the past" that is pretty obvious and I'm sure everyone here know that. However you've just contradicted yourself and everything that has happened in the past has most defiantly done so without a victor dimension.

Your view of history seems to be very limited to armies, empires and key people. There is much more to history that your Churchill's and Caesar's, when you realise that their is more to history than this you'll realise that their is not such thing as a victor dimension.
Original post by TheHistorian19
x


I know every event in history was a consequence of a victor dimension, unless it was not written by victors directly. That applies to my examples too. Is it that what you wanted to tell me? of course from this point of view, you are right, right at each point of time. But its the event only to a certain period of time in history which was regarded by myself. I merely count the event at a certain period of time, without the backgrounds.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by Kallisto
I know everything event in history was a consequence of a victor dimension, unless it was not written by victors directly. That applies to my examples too. Is it that what you wanted to tell me? of course from this point of view, you are right, right at each point of time. But its the event only to a certain period of time in history which was regarded by myself. I merely count the event at a certain period of time, without the backgrounds.


So your argument is now that, for contemporaries at the time, an element of victory was clearly evident in the act. I again would disagree. You don't use many examples to convince but this popular concept of 'history is written by the victors' is a popular and modern concept and that is it. What you are doing is using this modern term and looking back and pinning it on events which is wrong; we should, as you say, understand the event and understand their motives upon said acts - this is the right mentality of a historian, using popular terms and looking back to try and categorise is not.
Original post by KingStannis
They weren't writing "History". They were writing documents which historians use to study the time. Maybe the evidence isn't good enough to have an accurate picture; that's nothing to do with the "Victors" writing history.


in that case we can say that history is never written by the Victors, unless some of them resume or begin careers as historians after the victory. Sir Winston Churchill was a distinguished historian, so is a possible exception.
Original post by the bear
in that case we can say that history is never written by the Victors, unless some of them resume or begin careers as historians after the victory. Sir Winston Churchill was a distinguished historian, so is a possible exception.


Pretty much.
Who **** knows what was going on during the dark ages :dontknow:
History is written by the survivors.
Original post by ChaoticButterfly
Who **** knows what was going on during the dark ages :dontknow:


Islam did.


Surely history is written not by the victors, but by the people who bother to write stuff down.
Reply 54
Original post by mojojojo101
Surely history is written not by the victors, but by the people who bother to write stuff down.


True, but which sources are relied upon and repeated determines how the majority view it.

It is the job of the historian to make sure that, as far as possible, the true picture is made known.
Original post by The Socktor
History is written by the survivors.


Do you mean survivors in the sense of contemporary witness?

Original post by ChaoticButterfly
Who **** knows what was going on during the dark ages :dontknow:


There are some dark ages which are well known, holocaust for instance.
Original post by Kallisto
Do you mean survivors in the sense of contemporary witness?



There are some dark ages which are well known, holocaust for instance.


erm, what
Original post by KingStannis
erm, what


Okay, if you are so precisely, you can say that the holocaust was a horrible part of a dark age, World War II.
Original post by Kallisto
Do you mean survivors in the sense of contemporary witness?



There are some dark ages which are well known, holocaust for instance.


The Dark ages is a period of time in Europe between when the Roman Empire collapsed and medical society erupted. Not much was written down so it is called the Dark Ages.
Original post by ChaoticButterfly
The Dark ages is a period of time in Europe between when the Roman Empire collapsed and medical society erupted. Not much was written down so it is called the Dark Ages.


I see. Do you talk about the middle ages, don't you? okay, I get it. My mistake!

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending