Majority of Britons now see Muslims as a threat as terror concerns grow

race wars ahead

There Islam and political Islam. There is a clear distinction. Catholicism was inextricably linked to republicanism, and protestantism to unionism, in northern Ireland

NO, it should be the other way round, if Muslims don't like our laws and culture, THEY should get out. I don't think a single Brit would ever choose to have more Muslims coming into the country.

Posted from TSR Mobile

The only threat to most westerners is the westerner himself. Islam would rescue an awful lot of people here from their self inflicted abuse and from the yob culture permeating the majority of UK society.

Many Brits are Muslim. I don't see why people seem to be unable to comprehend that some Muslims are British and some British people are Muslim. So essentially you are saying that if some British people don't like British laws and culture, that they should get out? Seems illogical to me. I am British, but I do not agree with every law and do not participate or admire every piece of British culture. But I believe there is still room for improvement

Myself, just as any other British person, whether Christian, Muslim, Atheist etc... should be entitled to criticise British society. Just because people criticise Britain, it doesn't mean they should leave. As much as I criticise Britain, I still consider it to be one of the best places to live in the world.

I'm talking about when Muslims push for Shariah Law or for every single piece of meat to be Halal. Obviously Shariah Law goes completely against British laws so if Muslims don't follow our law, they should move to somewhere with Shariah Law. We shouldn't be changing our laws just to suit Muslims.

Posted from TSR Mobile

yes the UN has said sharia is incompatible with human rights hell even muslim majority countries has said Human right legislation is wrong as it goes against Sharia

Human rights https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia#Human_rights

Several major, predominantly Muslim countries have criticized the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) for its perceived failure to take into account the cultural and religious context of non-Western countries. Iran declared in the UN assembly that UDHR was "a secular understanding of the Judeo-Christian tradition", which could not be implemented by Muslims without trespassing the Islamic law.[182]

you are ignoring this simple fact

In practice, as of 2011, 20 Islamic nations had laws declaring apostasy from Islam as illegal and a criminal offense. Such laws are incompatible with the UDHR's requirement of freedom of thought, conscience and religion.[208][209][210][211]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia#Human_rights

I could go on and on

but here is an Islamic 'version' of human rights that all muslim countries have signed up to and as you can see they implicitly deny Human Rights

Can you reference any form or "package" of sharia that's compatible with modern human rights such as the UDHR?

The UN cannot give a verdict on Sharia in and of itself.

I suspect this post will be ignored BUT:

Ironically, ask any MI5, government official or police officer and they tell you the growing threat to the country is from the so called "native" white population.


Whether it is paedophilia, robbery, murder, terror on UK soil, or any sort of crime - the white community is on top of the list.

The question that muslims, jews, blacks, asians, latinos, africans, eastern europeans have is when will the so called "native" white community denounce this, speak against it, protest about it? Where are the leaders?

Well, Muslims can say what they like but Islam's inherently religiously fuelled violent history leaves a lot to be desired.

I don't think most Muslims understand the monstrosity they follow, and if they knew the truth I think Islam's follower base would dissipate very quickly if they were more informed. I struggle to see how educated Muslims still follow this unreformed medieval ideology.

EDIT: I think calling Islam medieval is a stretch. Were talking dark ages here.

Dark Arges is a very European Term, the Dark Arges where actually great for most of the world its only europe that went through a bad period

Women could own property 100s of years before they could in english speaking countries, so who exactly is progressive and who is not ?

The pages of history are full of violence which is fulled by politics not religion.

And you know that how? Have you been speaking to Mi5 about their concerns?

1. That's not true, there are very few white British people convicted of terror offences, they certainly don't top the list.
2. Of course white people are going to commit most crime, over 92% of the population is white. If you look at it in proportion every other race is overrepresented in crime statistics


Posted from TSR Mobile

no-one can on this planet. sharia is simply a theoretical idea that only mohammed could have known how to implement. but it hasnt stop some islamic states trying to impose what they believe sharia to be. in all cases, they are disgusting and oppressive states that dehumanise society and supress human rights. Noone needs a UN report to see that

It is a theoretical framework. I haven't studied Sharia but it is an enormous field with many different opinions from scholars. Each state's interpretation of Sharia will be different and its reaction as with all laws are subjective. I have no doubt that many rulers and lawmakers do codify their political beliefs and interests into ostensible sharia laws.

Women could own property 100s of years before they could in english speaking countries, so who exactly is progressive and who is not ?.

that is because as i just said, sharia is a made up concept, no one could tell you how it factually was supposed to work anymore than someone could explain
how to be a Jedi. the idea of sharia in quran is simply referring to the system of following the quranic edicts and rules.

the same dark ages period forced women to be covered in shrouds because islamic men could not be trusted to not sexually assault them otherwise and of course women were stoned to death for adultery. i think you are over- playing the period of islamic 'enlightenment'.

where europe certainly did go through a dark age period ( due to islam's abrahmic relation, (puritanical christianity) the rest of the non-christian , non islamic world was far in advance - asia had china and india which were far in advance of both societies. middle east had persia before islamic conquest. Far east had japan and Korea, again far ahead in terms of engineering, ship building and meturlagy.

islams history is indeed filled with bloodshed - any politics at this time was driven by islamic doctrine btw, as it is in the most primitive minds of the modern day islamist.

Well, the West has actually progressed, unlike islam.