Could Jeremy Corbyn solve the ISIS problem?

Reply 20

AdderDee

2

Original post by Ashtar

Wasn't he a Jihadist supporter ?

If you read the Daily Fail, then yes.

Reply 21

Ashtar

1

Original post by AdderDee

If you read the Daily Fail, then yes.

He called Hezbollah "friends"..

Reply 22

IvoryToast

3

Can Jeremy corbyn even tie his own shoe laces?

Reply 23

Johann von Gauss

14

Mr Corbyn would solve the ISIS problem; he'll make sure there's no Western Civilisation for them to attack!

Reply 24

Hasan_Ahmed

2

Original post by Ashtar

He called Hezbollah "friends"..

You do realise what he meant by that? Or are you just gonna follow right wing propaganda without listening to what he had to say about it? He said 'our friends in hezbollah and hamas' in a diplomatic, polite manner. First of all, my opinions on Hezbollah do not match those of corbyn. He says that he doesn't agree with Hezbollah's actions. I 100% support them, and they are not terrorists by any definition of the word, but anti-imperial, anti-invasionist repellers. They did not attack targets in argentina - they rejected it. No terrorist group rejects credit for the actions they commit for the purpose of instilling terror - it's in the name.

Reply 25

Ashtar

1

Original post by Hasan_Ahmed

I 100% support them, and they are not terrorists by any definition of the word

Not surprised at all tbqh

Reply 26

Hasan_Ahmed

2

Original post by Ashtar

Not surprised at all tbqh

And I'm not suprised how quick you are to assume that the western media is definitely honest and correct in their judgement of them. They have never done anything unjust or morally questionable. The only unjust things that they had was their ideology before they accepted Ayatullah Fadhlallah as a spiritual guide, who told them that trying to create an islamic state in a region with so many non muslims would be unjust and that they should focus on prosperity and security for the people of the region, and Imam Ali (a.s) had done for the non muslims in persia (including iraq) and Muhammad had done for the syrian christians.

Reply 27

KimKallstrom

14

Negotiation and diplomacy with a terrorist organisation whose goal is to establish a caliphate from Sri Lanka to France in which everyone who's not a Wahabbi would either be killed, enslaved, raped or at best taxed?

I wonder what concessions he supposes ISIS would make considering they have absolutely no intention to be diplomatic or negotiate. On this basis it's obvious that this would basically equate to letting these terrorists do whatever they want.

They probably laugh at him over in Raqqa.

Reply 28

The Rad Prince

2

Original post by KimKallstrom

Negotiation and diplomacy with a terrorist organisation whose goal is to establish a caliphate from Sri Lanka to France in which everyone who's not a Wahabbi would either be killed, enslaved, raped or at best taxed?

I wonder what concessions he supposes ISIS would make considering they have absolutely no intention to be diplomatic or negotiate. On this basis it's obvious that this would basically equate to letting these terrorists do whatever they want.

They probably laugh at him over in Raqqa.

IS would kill him

Bloody Iranian shill

Reply 29

iamthetruth

1

IS aint no problem to me they are irrelevant

Reply 30

Zargabaath

21

Original post by DiddyDec

What does the strongest one do after being trapped and forced to fight?

Turn on those who trapped them.

Posted from TSR Mobile

I can't see a country from the Middle East ever rising to enough power to become a threat to the West, so long as we don't allow Middle Easterners to enter our countries and don't allow our own citizens to enter theirs.

Reply 31

DiddyDec01

3

Original post by Zargabaath

I can't see a country from the Middle East ever rising to enough power to become a threat to the West, so long as we don't allow Middle Easterners to enter our countries and don't allow our own citizens to enter theirs.

I think they could. ISIS are already a threat to the west.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 32

Zargabaath

21

Original post by DiddyDec

I think they could. ISIS are already a threat to the west.

Posted from TSR Mobile

ISIS are a threat to the west because we still have contact with the Middle East

Reply 33

Sagacious

13

Original post by Zargabaath

I don't see why that's a stupid idea.

It's not a stupid idea, it's the right idea.

We can't reason with those irrational people, they can't accept democracy so we shouldn't force it on them. They contribute very little to the world, bar oil. We should just turn a blind eye and let them do whatever their religion tells them to do. If that means they kill each other because they can't agree on what happened after the death of the Prophet Muhammad then so be it.

It's not our problem.

They are only a threat to us because we intervened.

Reply 34

KingBradly

1

Original post by Iamyourfather

One of my friends on Facebook is a massive Corbynite, and with respect to ISIS, he says:

I think he's off his rocket but I figured there wasn't much point arguing with an extreme liberal (and vice versa). But what are your thoughts on Corbyn's views on ISIS?

I don't think you know what a "liberal" is. In any case, Corbyn isn't one, he's a collectivist, not an individualist.

He's also just a wrinkly adolescent with lots of ideas that sound nice but are completely delusional.

Reply 35

username2083347

2

He's a joke. Nowhere near the solution lol

Reply 36

Zargabaath

21

Original post by Sagacious

It's not a stupid idea, it's the right idea.

We can't reason with those irrational people, they can't accept democracy so we shouldn't force it on them. They contribute very little to the world, bar oil. We should just turn a blind eye and let them do whatever their religion tells them to do. If that means they kill each other because they can't agree on what happened after the death of the Prophet Muhammad then so be it.

It's not our problem.

They are only a threat to us because we intervened.

This is what I think too

Reply 37

Shabalala

14

So when ISIS where closing in around Mount Sinjar raping, torturing and killing every Yazidi and Kurd in their sight they were on the brink of slaughtering everyone Jeremy Corbyn and people of his ilk would have done nothing, if it wasn't for extremely heavy Coalition airstrikes in support if Kurdish forces then everyone on that mountain would have died is that what the moral coward Mr. Corbyn wanted?

Jeremy Corbyn seems to live in a parallel universe where the world is peaceful and the only reason for violence is because of the west.

Reply 38

User1014865

OP

17

Original post by KingBradly

I don't think you know what a "liberal" is. In any case, Corbyn isn't one, he's a collectivist, not an individualist.

He's also just a wrinkly adolescent with lots of ideas that sound nice but are completely delusional.