Islamist protesters lead anti-Jewish chants at US embassy

So they don't have total control over Gaza's airspace, maritime space, borders and Gaza isn't totally dependent on Israel for water and electricity and the international community at large doesn't consider Gaza occupied as a result?

Alternative facts are out in force.

In protest against the Trump administration's decision to move the US embassy to Jerusalem (a decision with which I fundamentally disagree), there was predictably a protest outside the US embassy.

And predictably, the chants were not merely against Israel. They started chanting about how Jews should remember the 7th century Battle of Khaybar.

https://twitter.com/hurryupharry/status/939253702497628161

The Battle of Khaybar was a battle in which Mohammed attacked the Jews who had lived for many hundreds of years at the peaceful oasis there, tending their flocks and weaving cloaks of fine cloth for sale at various markets and to passing caravans.

The army of Mohammed attacked and slaughtered many of that Jewish tribe, and then when they beat them, they "generously" allowed them to stay on condition they pay a tax of 50% of their income as a tribute. This was the first jizya.

A few years later the Jews were expelled from the oasis, and like all the other Arabian Jews, driven out of Arabia.

It seems that no other protesters tried to stop these people doing this chant or intervened in any way. In fairness, I might not intervene; they look scary and might try to behead me.

Is Jerusalem the capital of Israel right? So if it geographically is, why are people being salty about it?

Is Jerusalem the capital of Israel right?

Jews were given land in the past and were told that it's theirs. Muslims then came along claiming it as there own and decided to attack the jews. They lost and had a bit of their land taken away.

And in return the muslims are now playing the victim card?

When 1 muslim dies in an attack, u act as if it that tons of muslims have been killed and that the news deserves to be world wide, but when it's the other way around, you're the first ones to be quiet. A lot of hypocrisy.

Well according to intl law it cant be as it isn't there's.

SURE... The fact that you believe twitter just makes me laugh. and where did you get that rubbish about The Battle of Khaybar, Wikipedia?

Jews were given land in the past and were told that it's theirs. Muslims then came along claiming it as there own and decided to attack the jews. They lost and had a bit of their land taken away.

And in return the muslims are now playing the victim card?

When 1 muslim dies in an attack, u act as if it that tons of muslims have been killed and that the news deserves to be world wide, but when it's the other way around, you're the first ones to be quiet. A lot of hypocrisy.

im sorry but ive never so much bull in my life please check your sources you islamophobic freak. 'muslims then decided to attack the jews' talk about the millions of millions of muslims being slaughtered by israelis right now. so ignorant. a death of one muslim is damaging to the rest of us and when do you ever see a muslim potrayed as a victim in the news. never. whenever somebody murder a muslims its regarded as 'mental health' and sent to rehab. this war has been going on for years and years so dont chat the most and play the jews being the victims. this land belonged to the palestinians first.

I'm sorry but there's nothing in international law that would prevent the Israeli capital being in West Jerusalem, which is within the 67 borders. In fact, their capital already is in Jerusalem.

The reason Palestinians object to countries moving their embassy there is that it has implications for the final status of Jerusalem, something that should be up for negotiation in any peace deal.