The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Throne
The video recordings of the four men who carried out the 7/7 attacks on central London clearly demonstrate that they were motivated by religion. For example, Mohammad Sidique Khan referred to the Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan as 'my people', he claimed that he was in a 'jihad' and that he was going to be rewarded in the 'afterlife'.


That doesn't mean he was motivated by religion. Like I said, that seems very political.
He thought that it was unfair that the Iraqis and Afghans were having war waged upon them, and wanted to send a message to the UK government.
"Jihad" isn't some special Muslim word. It just means "trying very hard to achieve something". It is not a religious word, in the same way that "God" or "Holy" or "Angel" are specifically religious words.
He thought that he was doing a good deed.

It's not like Islam/the Qur'an was actually telling him "Yeah, go and blow up those trains"



Firstly, you don't have a monopoly on the interpretation of Islam.


The Qur'an states in quite explicit terms that murder is prohibited.
How else can you 'interpret' that?

Secondly, I think most people in the civilized world would regard a religion which demands the murdering of adults who have consensual sex in private as one that does not prohibit murder.


Which religion are you talking about, exactly? It's certainly not Islam...
Reply 81
Selkarn
It's not terrorism, it wasn't even a murder - they were simply preventing that filth from killing more babies.


No matter what you think of him, it was murder and can actually be condoned as terrorism.

I hate that he is getting the blame as the mothers themselves ask for it. Hypocritical at the highest level.
Reply 82
adamdivine
Technically the doctor was a Christian also... He was attending church when he got shot remember

What is yourt point? It makes no difference.
Reply 83
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. The irony is that any sense of morality and goodness is thrown out of the window in the process.
Reply 84
tazarooni89
That doesn't mean he was motivated by religion. Like I said, that seems very political.
He thought that it was unfair that the Iraqis and Afghans were having war waged upon them, and wanted to send a message to the UK government.
"Jihad" isn't some special Muslim word. It just means "trying very hard to achieve something". It is not a religious word, in the same way that "God" or "Holy" or "Angel" are specifically religious words.
He thought that he was doing a good deed.

It's not like Islam/the Qur'an was actually telling him "Yeah, go and blow up those trains"


The fact that he referred to Iraqis and Afghanistani people as 'my people' makes it clear that his religion played a central role in motivating him. What other connection did Khan have to Iraqis or Afghanistanis? He didn't have any familial or ethnic connections - merely religious. Plus, the fact that he referred to the reward he expects to get in the 'afterlife' is another testament to the factors that motivated him.

tazarooni89
The Qur'an states in quite explicit terms that murder is prohibited.
How else can you 'interpret' that?


There are many disagreements in the Muslim world regarding a plethora of issues so it's not difficult to assume that there might also be some disagrement on this issue. Once again, you may disagree with his interpretation but that doesn't render it de jure invalid.

tazarooni89
Which religion are you talking about, exactly? It's certainly not Islam...


According to many Islamic clerics, the death penalty is mandatory for adults who engage in consensual sexual relations outside of marriage.
Reply 85
superkitten


P.S. I love you, Howard. :biggrin: That post was just... Beautiful.


I've edited it a bit now. NEVER accept base statistics from anybody. If a statistic sounds like it's been pulled out of somebody's backside, 10 minutes research normally confirms it.
Reply 86
Meus
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. The irony is that any sense of morality and goodness is thrown out of the window in the process.


I don't think this guy was a terrorist or a freedom fighter. He was just a nut.
If someone was going around murdering people, and legally sanctioned and walking free, and he would probably murder many, many more people before he was brought to justice, I think many people would be somewhat willing to murder him in turn in vigilante justice.

Of course, this might not be entirely comparable, because whether or not Tiller was actually murdering is contentious. (Though it is what the shooter believed.)
Throne
The fact that he referred to Iraqis and Afghanistani people as 'my people' makes it clear that his religion played a central role in motivating him. What other connection did Khan have to Iraqis or Afghanistanis? He didn't have any familial or ethnic connections - merely religious.


Of course he has religious ties with them - but that doesn't mean the religion is motivating him. It doesn't mean that he thinks the Qur'an is asking him to blow up trains. It just means that he doesn't like the fact that they are being attacked.


Plus, the fact that he referred to the reward he expects to get in the 'afterlife' is another testament to the factors that motivated him.


No it isn't. It doesn't say anything about his motivation, it just tells us that he believed what he was doing was right. (And as a result, he believes he will be rewarded for it). Once again, it doesn't mean that he thinks the Qur'an itself has asked him to blow up trains. It just means that he thinks it's the right thing to do.



There are many disagreements in the Muslim world regarding a plethora of issues so it's not difficult to assume that there might also be some disagrement on this issue. Once again, you may disagree with his interpretation but that doesn't render it de jure invalid.


I think you'll find that the disagreements in the Muslim world are never regarding something which is explicitly stated in the Qur'an.
For example, if anyone tells you that it is permissible to eat pork in Islam, they are wrong. No alternative interpretations, no subjectivity - they are wrong.
There may be other disagreements - for example, who was the rightful leader of the Muslim community after Muhammad died? Nothing about this is mentioned in the Qur'an.

According to many Islamic clerics, the death penalty is mandatory for adults who engage in consensual sexual relations outside of marriage.


What on earth is an Islamic 'cleric'?

By what authority do they claim that the death penalty is mandatory? By what authority do they overrule the Qur'an, which prescribes a completely different punishment, and requires four witnesses before any punishment can be administered?

If they can back up their opinions with something from the Qur'an or Hadith, that's fine - but it may prove to be a difficult job.
Reply 89
Howard
I don't think this guy was a terrorist or a freedom fighter. He was just a nut.


People kill and get killed for nothing. That's where the real insanity lies. To a group of Pro-Lifers, late-term abortion is active murder of babies and it's hard to convince most people otherwise. I don't think you can safely accuse this guy of being a nut.

There is a saying the fastest way to Hell is by through trying to do good and this example personifies that. It was a vengeance attack. And although we can all tag vengeance murders as wrong, anyone can find themselves in that position. Everyone has a breaking point. He just followed up on his
Elipsis
Only 1% of abortions are carried out because of rape and incest, so the notion that abortion, especially late term, should be allowed because of this is laughable; it is saving 1 life and the expense of 100.


Actually, what you're describing is not saving any lives.
Reply 91
The Bachelor
If someone was going around murdering people, and legally sanctioned and walking free, and he would probably murder many, many more people before he was brought to justice, I think many people would be somewhat willing to murder him in turn in vigilante justice.

Of course, this might not be entirely comparable, because whether or not Tiller was actually murdering is contentious. (Though it is what the shooter believed.)


This guy confesses on tape to have 'aborted' a child a day before it's due date. This entire clinic 'specialises' in aborting pregnancies over 24 weeks.



This one is even smiling



Can someone please try to intelligently argue how this would not be murder? The law is damn wrong, so wrong on this.
Reply 92
tazarooni89
Of course he has religious ties with them - but that doesn't mean the religion is motivating him. It doesn't mean that he thinks the Qur'an is asking him to blow up trains. It just means that he doesn't like the fact that they are being attacked.


He doesn't like the fact that they are being attacked because they are Muslims - that's why he says 'my people'.

tazarooni89
No it isn't. It doesn't say anything about his motivation, it just tells us that he believed what he was doing was right. (And as a result, he believes he will be rewarded for it). Once again, it doesn't mean that he thinks the Qur'an itself has asked him to blow up trains. It just means that he thinks it's the right thing to do.


Yes, he thinks he's doing the right thing on the basis of his religious belief; that's why he thinks he will be rewarded in the 'afterlife'.

tazarooni89
I think you'll find that the disagreements in the Muslim world are never regarding something which is explicitly stated in the Qur'an.
For example, if anyone tells you that it is permissible to eat pork in Islam, they are wrong. No alternative interpretations, no subjectivity - they are wrong.
There may be other disagreements - for example, who was the rightful leader of the Muslim community after Muhammad died? Nothing about this is mentioned in the Qur'an.


Actually, there's disagrement with regard to appropriate clothing; domestic violence; the role of women; etc.

Secondly, it's arguable as to what extent killing is prohibited in Islam.

tazarooni89
By what authority do they claim that the death penalty is mandatory? By what authority do they overrule the Qur'an, which prescribes a completely different punishment, and requires four witnesses before any punishment can be administered?

If they can back up their opinions with something from the Qur'an or Hadith, that's fine - but it may prove to be a difficult job.


So you're saying that Islam does not prescribe the death penalty for those who engage in sexual relations outside of marriage?
Meus
This guy confesses on tape to have 'aborted' a child a day before it's due date. This entire clinic 'specialises' in aborting pregnancies over 24 weeks.



This one is even smiling



Can someone please try to intelligently argue how this would not be murder? The law is damn wrong, so wrong on this.


Simple. Not everything that smiles is human. Actually, the "argument" you put forth (if you can even call it that) is pretty fallacious in itself.

Edit: Because you are essentially saying "killing something that looks like this, or smiles, is murder". This is far from apparent.
Reply 94
Meus
People kill and get killed for nothing. That's where the real insanity lies. To a group of Pro-Lifers, late-term abortion is active murder of babies and it's hard to convince most people otherwise. I don't think you can safely accuse this guy of being a nut.

There is a saying the fastest way to Hell is by through trying to do good and this example personifies that. It was a vengeance attack. And although we can all tag vengeance murders as wrong, anyone can find themselves in that position. Everyone has a breaking point. He just followed up on his


"The road to hell is paved with good intentions"
Reply 95
I don't care whether you're pro-life or pro-choice, how can anybody be
glad this man is dead? I mean even if you wouldn't care about some random guy dying you should care about a doctor! This guy probably saved far more lives than he performed abortions, if you believe that abortion takes a life. Look here:

from http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/5/31/737320/-The-George-Tiller-I-Knew
In 1975 my Mom noticed an indention in her left breast. She called and made an appointment with her OB/GYN, Dr. George Tiller. After his initial examination, he ordered a biopsy. While performing the biopsy he immediately knew that the lump was cancerous. Instead of just closing and scheduling surgery, he “grabbed a handful”, his words not mine. Her cancer Dr. credited this quick thinking by Dr. Tiller with saving her life, and due to this she didn’t even have to undergo chemotherapy.

Several years later my Mother and I were driving by his clinic in Wichita. Mom started complaining of chest pains, so I drove into his parking lot and ran in to get help. Dr. Tiller was by Mom’s side immediately, and stabilized her, before the heart attack could cause severe damage.

In 1980 I was pregnant with my first child. I had no insurance and couldn't afford a doctors appointment until I was approved for a medical card.. Mom told Dr. Tiller and he brought me into his office where he examined me, free of charge. I can credit him with the very first picture taken of my son.

The last story I have to share is about my friends who could not have children. Dr. Tiller’s office worked with several attorneys in the Wichita area to provide adoption services for his patients who wanted this option. My friends have a 10 yr. old boy now, who is loved and adored.
Reply 96
Elipsis
I don't see his murder as any different to the murders he carried out every single day at his clinic, I mean he specialised in late term abortions for goodness sake. I don't think his murder was right none the less.

Here's to help you see..
One of these acts is legal and one is illegal. Your moral judgement about it doesn't affect its legality.
End of.
The people who did this should be jailed for life.
Reply 97
Meus
This guy confesses on tape to have 'aborted' a child a day before it's due date. This entire clinic 'specialises' in aborting pregnancies over 24 weeks.


Why is abortion after 24 weeks worse than abortion before that?

Meus
This one is even smiling


A fetus can't smile.

Meus
Can someone please try to intelligently argue how this would not be murder? The law is damn wrong, so wrong on this.


Murder is a legal term so if it's not murder according to the law, how can it be murder?
Reply 98
Meus


Can someone please try to intelligently argue how this would not be murder? The law is damn wrong, so wrong on this.


OMG that is why we HAVE LAWS. If everyone just did what they felt was right, then it would be choas. Laws are there to offer black/white distinction over grey issues, like this one.
Ive said it once and ill say it again, what he does is legal, what they did is illegal. That is the key point.
So you're saying that Islam does not prescribe the death penalty for those who engage in sexual relations outside of marriage?

the Hadith orders stoning for those who engage in sexual relations outside of marriage if either four adult muslim men witness the act or the husband/wife testify that he/she cheated or saw the other cheating this could be denied by the other party if they wish not to get killed :wink: but when you're having sex infront of a group of people it's no longer a private matter no?

Latest

Trending

Trending