Capacity utilisation is concerned with how resources are used to produce actual output, which is compared to the maximum potential output.
Some of the key points - High CU allows Mobeen to cover for their fixed cost. - High Cu enables higher sales and profit - More chairs and tables are utilised. which reduces wasted investment.
AHHHH comepletly forgot about the more chairs and tables...ahh bummer
advantages of recruitment externally....
i wrote a paragraph on question 4 about the quality control...ran outa bloody time and wrote a page n half on the onie on just in time...which was annoying cos we had to analyse it...
Capacity utilisation is concerned with how resources are used to produce actual output, which is compared to the maximum potential output.
Some of the key points - High CU allows Mobeen to cover for their fixed cost. - High Cu enables higher sales and profit - More chairs and tables are utilised. which reduces wasted investment.
I also wrote about less storage costs and finance available to expand into Europe.Food is of persihable nature so it goes to waste if they do not have high capacity utilisation and that they can not offer high quality food if capacity utilisation is low as food quality gets bad if it isnt used fresh. Is it right?
How were you supposed toi attemt the stakeholder conflicts questions??? I was completely lost on that!
i just defined stakeholders for some knowledge marks.. i then described some of the conflicts, for example when local community complained about the smoke and smell, and i said how and if it effected the growth of the business.. i also talked about the continuous conflict between marks expansion plans and sukis social responsibilities.. and other issues including the crisis with the suppliers due to the channel 4 reprt... i evaluated and said the conflicts didnt really effect the growth of the business as it grew very fast but some of the conflicts may of had a small delay on it.. also since mark had 51% of the business what he said was what happened, therefore sukis conflict didnt have much affect.
i just defined stakeholders for some knowledge marks.. i then described some of the conflicts, for example when local community complained about the smoke and smell, and i said how and if it effected the growth of the business.. i also talked about the continuous conflict between marks expansion plans and sukis social responsibilities.. and other issues including the crisis with the suppliers due to the channel 4 reprt... i evaluated and said the conflicts didnt really effect the growth of the business as it grew very fast but some of the conflicts may of had a small delay on it.. also since mark had 51% of the business what he said was what happened, therefore sukis conflict didnt have much affect.
Oh noo...I forgot about local community and customers being stakeholders I included the conflict between owners,manager and employees,and manager and supplier at Chelsea.And ended the question by concluding that despite all conflicts it was still growing and expanding andd succesful.But it depend on how you measure success,whether in terms of expansion as Mark and Raj wanted or good image...
i just defined stakeholders for some knowledge marks.. i then described some of the conflicts, for example when local community complained about the smoke and smell, and i said how and if it effected the growth of the business.. i also talked about the continuous conflict between marks expansion plans and sukis social responsibilities.. and other issues including the crisis with the suppliers due to the channel 4 reprt... i evaluated and said the conflicts didnt really effect the growth of the business as it grew very fast but some of the conflicts may of had a small delay on it.. also since mark had 51% of the business what he said was what happened, therefore sukis conflict didnt have much affect.
i wrote about the disgruntled employee who reported to channel 4, i thought employees were stakeholders