The Student Room Group

People who kill Transgender people to get longer sentences...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16089715

What do we think?

Is it fair that people who kill Transgender (or disabled) people get longer sentences than those who kill "normal" people? Does it somehow imply that it is worse to kill minorities - afterall, isn't all killing abhorent?

EDIT: Just to be crystal clear I've got nothin against Trans/Gay/Bi/whatever minority you care to mention, the article just strikes me as suggesting that killing someone from a minority group is somehow worse than killing someone who isn't from a minority group - when murder is murder and therefore the same no matter who you kill...

speaking of which, murder gets a mandatory life sentence at the moment doesn't it? Therefore isn't this a bit pointless? Unless of course it applies to manslaughter, but even then, it's difficult to argue that you kill someone accidentally/not mean to kill them because of their difference (unless of course you attack them and it results in death, but then it'd probably be murder.)


Just curious really.
(edited 12 years ago)

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
I'd imagine it's as a further dissuasion tactic, and because the trans community is at a far higher risk of violence than the remainder of the population.

In an ideal world, I'd love for the 'category' someone's in to not matter. But the fact remains that we live in a world where trans people are at a far, far higher risk of violent or sexual abuse, which can culminate in death, and that we need to send out the message that this isn't acceptable before we can level the playing field between cis and trans people.

(I'd argue that for all life sentences, this should mean 30 years and not 15 years minimum, to be honest...)
Reply 2
Original post by kerily
I'd imagine it's as a further dissuasion tactic, and because the trans community is at a far higher risk of violence than the remainder of the population.


Trans 'community'? I hate that phrase, well when applied to 'gay community', there aren't seperate communities for either, no segregaytion!:smile:
A murder is just as serious as the next. The sentence should be the same regardless of the victim's sex, race, sexuality or baked bean preference.

I mean, surlely it would be disrespectful to the murder victim's memory and their family if their murderer was given a shorter sentence compared to a murderer who had killed someone who was in any sort of minority?
Reply 4
Original post by Skip_Snip
Trans 'community'? I hate that phrase, well when applied to 'gay community', there aren't seperate communities for either, no segregaytion!:smile:


Not being funny, but are you cis? :sigh: I'd imagine that you are, considering that if you weren't, you'd understand that I just mean 'people who identify as non-cisgender' and not that there's some sort of separate clique...

In any case, we are very segregated in some ways, because mainstream cisgender society has a lot of problems with non-cisgender people. But that's not strictly the point of the thread.
Original post by kerily
I'd imagine it's as a further dissuasion tactic, and because the trans community is at a far higher risk of violence than the remainder of the population.

In an ideal world, I'd love for the 'category' someone's in to not matter. But the fact remains that we live in a world where trans people are at a far, far higher risk of violent or sexual abuse, which can culminate in death, and that we need to send out the message that this isn't acceptable before we can level the playing field between cis and trans people.

(I'd argue that for all life sentences, this should mean 30 years and not 15 years minimum, to be honest...)


Ah, so currently the minimum term for "life" is 15 years? And by doing this it will be increased to a minimum of 30 years if the victim is a Transexual or Disabled person?

I can see the point if Transsexual people are at more risk of violence I suppose... but again, doesn't one of the problems still boil down to the fact that murder is murder no matter who the victim? Therefore all murderers should be sentenced equally? I.e. minimum sentence of 30 for all murderers.
Reply 6
Original post by TheHistoryStudent
Ah, so currently the minimum term for "life" is 15 years? And by doing this it will be increased to a minimum of 30 years if the victim is a Transexual or Disabled person?


Yes.

I can see the point if Transsexual people are at more risk of violence I suppose... but again, doesn't one of the problems still boil down to the fact that murder is murder no matter who the victim? Therefore all murderers should be sentenced equally? I.e. minimum sentence of 30 for all murderers.


Trans people are at a far higher risk of violence. The problem is also one of perception - the 'trans panic' defence has been successfully employed (I don't know if this has happened in the UK, but it definitely has in the US), the majority of trans people don't feel that violence and threats against them are taken seriously, and even on a less mild note, rates of domestic violence/etc against trans people are much higher. A lot of people feel that because we're jokes in the media for the most part (and really, there's no denying that we are), this would also extend to the murder of trans people. Whether the latter deduction is right or not, the fact remains that a lot of the trans community feel that it's right, and feel threatened - and it would be lovely if this was addressed.
Reply 7
I don't understand how you can be "transphobic" - I mean, is there a term for hating/discriminating against people who get elf ears, ear plugs, forked tongues or other body modification surgery? Because that's all they are... and I mean no offence here, but no amount of operations can turn someone into a woman or a man. If you're born a guy, you'll always be a guy and if you're born a girl, you'll always be a girl. All these "sex change" operations do is mutilate the genitals to look like the y belong to the other sex, and add/remove breasts/hormones.

Personally, I'm against these operations completely. However, I don't hate transsexuals, nor would I discriminate against them. I just think they're not well and need support, not surgery.
Surely we should have a mandatory life sentence for all premeditated homicide, and a good 20 years+ minimum (parole eligiblity period at judge's discretion) for crimes of passion? We could also whack on another charge for racially/disability/sexuality motivated murders as well, maybe another 10 years minimum.

Then all the true psychos get locked up, crimes of passion are not lumped in in quite the same way, but those crimes of passion targeting someone for some trait or other could be punished at a midway point between the two.

The government needs to degree-separate murder charges before it does anything else. That's the one thing I like about the US justice system.
(edited 12 years ago)
Lol what makes them so special? It's like when people get arrested for insult muslims. What's so special about them? Especially when muslims racially abuse a WHITE woman the culprits are let off.
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 10
Original post by kerily
Not being funny, but are you cis? :sigh: I'd imagine that you are, considering that if you weren't, you'd understand that I just mean 'people who identify as non-cisgender' and not that there's some sort of separate clique...

In any case, we are very segregated in some ways, because mainstream cisgender society has a lot of problems with non-cisgender people. But that's not strictly the point of the thread.

I'm not straight no, but I don't see it as something which makes any difference, I've never met any problems, although I know others have, but there's no straight society/community, or gay or trans :smile: why should not identifying as straight seperate you from anyone else, or liken you to anyone else, you're you
Original post by kerily
Yes.



Trans people are at a far higher risk of violence. The problem is also one of perception - the 'trans panic' defence has been successfully employed (I don't know if this has happened in the UK, but it definitely has in the US), the majority of trans people don't feel that violence and threats against them are taken seriously, and even on a less mild note, rates of domestic violence/etc against trans people are much higher. A lot of people feel that because we're jokes in the media for the most part (and really, there's no denying that we are), this would also extend to the murder of trans people. Whether the latter deduction is right or not, the fact remains that a lot of the trans community feel that it's right, and feel threatened - and it would be lovely if this was addressed.


The thing is though, surely better measures need to be put in place to protect these people while they're alive, rather than dish out unequal punishments after they're dead, which at the end of the day, doesn't help them anyway.

It is deplorable that they are at a higher risk of violence/abuse etc - hence more measures are needed to protect them, but personally I still don't see why that justifies one rule for them in terms of sentences and one rule for others, murder is still murder.

Also, the point on it acting like a deterrent, personally I can't see it working very effectively, as most murders are probably commited on impulse rather than properly planned out - and hence someone only realises they could be spending the next 15-life years in jail after they've done it.
Reply 12
Original post by Skip_Snip
I'm not straight no, but I don't see it as something which makes any difference, I've never met any problems, although I know others have, but there's no straight society/community, or gay or trans :smile: why should not identifying as straight seperate you from anyone else, or liken you to anyone else, you're you


I didn't ask if you were straight, I asked if you were cisgendered.

Trans people have vastly different experiences to non-trans people, and often need specialist support - there's the medical/legal side of things, as well as the social side. We face difficulties that LGB cis people don't face with relationships and the like, as well. Unless you're actually a trans person who feels no need to have support from other trans people, I don't think you're qualified to tell trans people that they shouldn't seek support from other people in the same difficult situation, to be honest.

Original post by Rant
I mean no offence here, but no amount of operations can turn someone into a woman or a man. If you're born a guy, you'll always be a guy and if you're born a girl, you'll always be a girl.


What entertains me is that this is actually what trans people are arguing :teehee: A transman is born male, and is only altering his body so that he's more comfortable with it; a transwoman is born female, and is altering her body so that she's more comfortable with it. We're not changing our gender - we rather have an endocrine issue that means our bodies haven't developed correctly to suit our genders, and as such, we're taking medical steps to redress that, like anyone else with a medical problem would.

Obviously you're not arguing from such a perspective, but it entertained me all the same.
Reply 13
Original post by kerily
I didn't ask if you were straight, I asked if you were cisgendered.

Trans people have vastly different experiences to non-trans people, and often need specialist support - there's the medical/legal side of things, as well as the social side. We face difficulties that LGB cis people don't face with relationships and the like, as well. Unless you're actually a trans person who feels no need to have support from other trans people, I don't think you're qualified to tell trans people that they shouldn't seek support from other people in the same difficult situation, to be honest.



What entertains me is that this is actually what trans people are arguing :teehee: A transman is born male, and is only altering his body so that he's more comfortable with it; a transwoman is born female, and is altering her body so that she's more comfortable with it. We're not changing our gender - we rather have an endocrine issue that means our bodies haven't developed correctly to suit our genders, and as such, we're taking medical steps to redress that, like anyone else with a medical problem would.

Obviously you're not arguing from such a perspective, but it entertained me all the same.


But how can you be comfortable, say, going from a man to a woman, knowing you'll never be a "proper" woman - never able to give birth, that sort of thing?
Reply 14
Original post by Rant
But how can you be comfortable, say, going from a man to a woman, knowing you'll never be a "proper" woman - never able to give birth, that sort of thing?


I'd imagine transwomen feel just as valid as women as infertile ciswomen do. I don't think your genitalia or your chromosomes or whatever you want to decide on determine your gender - rather, they determine your biological sex, and your gender itself is determined purely by how you feel :smile:
It doesn't make any sense. Does this then mean that transgender people are not equal? Because why should their deaths result in longer sentences than normal people if they are? I'm not sure how a murder because someone hates someone because they are transgendered is any different than a murder because someon hates someones fashion style.
The longer sentence would only apply to murders motivated by a hostility towards transgender people.

This concept is nothing new. There are a lot of crimes which are aggravated because of the defendant's hostility towards a certain characteristic of the defendant. Racially aggravated crimes are an example.

This does not mean transgender people are being treated differently, it just means that the defendant's hatred of them is an aggravating factor when sentencing.
Reply 17
Original post by kerily
I'd imagine transwomen feel just as valid as women as infertile ciswomen do. I don't think your genitalia or your chromosomes or whatever you want to decide on determine your gender - rather, they determine your biological sex, and your gender itself is determined purely by how you feel :smile:


I could feel like I was a cat and walk around on all fours purring, hunting birds and eating them raw on the carpet.

If I then went and had surgery that mutilated my body to become a cat, would that be okay? Or should someone have tried to stop me?
What is the difference between Transgenders and Gay people?
Original post by Rant
I could feel like I was a cat and walk around on all fours purring, hunting birds and eating them raw on the carpet.

If I then went and had surgery that mutilated my body to become a cat, would that be okay? Or should someone have tried to stop me?


But becoming a cat is an attempt to change species.

Are you suggesting women are a different species to men? :confused:

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending