GEM applicant here.
I really thought this would be my year with the UKCAT, particularly as this is my second sitting, but I returned home devastated at my results (again).
I got an average of 620, B1. (570; 640; 680; 590). I got a similar score last year.
I have a Masters (Merit) with 2.1, but mediocre GCSEs and A-levels, and thus was considering Warwick as first choice. I went to their open day this year and they said it's unlikely that they'd interview anyone less than 2700. However, on their website, it says they'd consider people with <2700 if they have a PhD. Does anyone know (via personal experience) if there's a possibility of being invited with a Masters instead? (I will contact them to ask too).
It's a possibility with the average being lower this year due to the harder DA (esp. coupled with the hard VR), so do you think that I should consider applying to Warwick anyway (with the assumption they may lower their threshold)?
I haven't finished/prepared a Personal Statement yet, and was thinking that I'd be able to complete it if I got the score I needed to apply, but if it's not worth applying, it would save me 2 weeks of PS writing hell (which I don't mind pursuing if it means I have a shot at 2015 entry).
My other area of concern is the interview. Say I apply for 2016 entry, get through to the second round at the selection centre, but blow the interview. From now to that point would be about 2 years, which I can't help but think, is half to 2/3 of the time I could spend doing a PhD.