Norway is being Culturally Enriched

At 1.00 he received a knuckle duster from friend, broke his nose and gave him a concussion for nothing.

- 'Migrants' are not 'stripping countries of their resources' in the way that colonialists did. Rather, in GB at least, they make a net contribution to the economy.
- Colonialists did not go to places like Africa as refugees or even as economic migrants - they came from a more developed place to a less developed one - that's plain greed. They also, in many cases, systematically pressed and even destroyed the native population. Refugees and immigrants on the other hand are looking for a better life.
- If someone comes to Europe illegally then they're an illegal immigrant not 'just a migrant'. They also aren't part of a technologically advanced, racialist, imperialist mob as the colonialists were.

That guy is either a fool or taking his audience for fools.

It is incredibly difficult to respect the arguments of people who do not appreciate that migrants, on an individual level are just people making the incredibly brave decision to improve their and their families future prospects. I'll listen to arguments about school places, the burden to infrastructure and cultural integration all day - but unfortunately too many in this debate are just prejudiced losers.

I imagine a lot of people in less developed countries grow up with an image of the UK in their head as a place where they can thrive and succeed despite limited opportunities at home thanks to relatively generous labour laws and publicly provided healthcare. In much of the developed world I imagine the focus is more on our culture, history, high standards of education and the fact that we are the Anglosphere nation of Europe.

when white people come over to other lands for their resources, it's labelled "colonialism". when non-white people do this, it's called "cultural enrichment"
can I say that?

I am an immigrant. Stefan Molyneux is an immigrant. We both believe that people should have the option to move to any country they would like, but that does not mean it is acceptable for a mass immigration to happen in a country where most immigrants do not want the best for their country and only feed on its resources (welfare) that the country so nicely provides them due to liberal indoctrination. Cultural differences are a significant cause of this parasitical leeching on a country's resources. You can't seriously think a migrant from a third world country would come to a European country and act in a civilised, democratic and educated manner. Their parents most likely haven't had the luck to get educated in a third world country, so those migrants would not have any kind of values for education, and the same argument can be followed for incentive to work.

so that's a long drawn-out way of just saying "money", isn't it?
colonialists went to the other lands to get money too
arguably they actually improved the countries that they went to
which is why places that were colonised are, on average, wealthier than the african nations that weren't.

so that's a long drawn-out way of just saying "money", isn't it?
colonialists went to the other lands to get money too
arguably they actually improved the countries that they went to
which is why places that were colonised are, on average, wealthier than the african nations that weren't.

But migrants in the UK, and I don't know whether that includes you, make a net contribution to this country.

the average penis size in pakistan is 4.5 inches. same with india.

Their contribution would be even better if immigrants were properly selected.

when white people come over to other lands for their resources, it's labelled "colonialism". when non-white people do this, it's called "cultural enrichment"
can I say that?

Except immigration from all other countries to the UK/EU is already strict and properly selected. It's just for some reason they're more lenient with people from Islamic countries or all of them are illegal.

Their contribution would be even better if immigrants were properly selected.

Cultural Enrichment is a non-word.

How is migration properly selected? The EU is picking up any boat they find in the Mediterranean and shipping the people to Europe. Last year, millions have made it through the Balkan route alone.

Not sure if you understood my post.

I said it seems more lenient from Islamic/Arabic countries (i.e. The ones you're talking about) compared with immigration from the rest of the world.

I've no intention of arguing with that - my point is that it's wrong to demonise immigrants as some kind of invading hoarde.

Not sure if you understood my post.

I said it seems more lenient from Islamic/Arabic countries (i.e. The ones you're talking about) compared with immigration from the rest of the world.