Regressive left tries to twist Munich narrative to suit their agenda

How in the world can you believe the news so naively... People behind the BBC, Sky, etc have their own agenda to carry out, their own propaganda to carry out.

In this case, they're merely trying to avoid calling anyone a Islamic terrorist because they're afraid of being called racist. Only until recently, for example, did Hillary Clinton call a terrorist act Islamic radicalism... The same for Obama, etc and of course, the media, some of which are yet to call terrorism by its true name.

Just because the chap was from Persia does not mean he was Islamic....

"Bahá'ís, Mandeans, Yarsanis, Zoroastrians, Jews, and Christians" are all minority religions in that country.*

Just because the chap was from Persia does not mean he was Islamic....

"Bahá'ís, Mandeans, Yarsanis, Zoroastrians, Jews, and Christians" are all minority religions in that country.*

As soon as reports that the shooter might be white started circulating, you could hear these idiots smacking their lips.

God what obvious propaganda/psyops. He was Iranian, his name was Ali, yet the media will STILL try and spin it that he was a "white supremacist".

There is literally no sources for any "link" between him and Breivik, their only "point" is that it happened on the same day, and they spend most of the article talking about Breivik and his victims for no reason.

How anyone can look at garbage journalism like this and claim there's a media bias against Muslims is DELUSIONAL.

I know, it's pathetic. And that clown even went and made a thread about it:

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=4224024

The majority of Muslims in Iran are Shia. I can't personally remember the last Shia terrorist attack in the West. According to wikipedia, only some 4 to 8% are Sunni. I suspect the individual is more likely to be Sunni, though I could be wrong.

There's no evidence of IS affiliation, unless you have information that the German police and security services don't?

And I assume you've some compelling evidence of his association with Islamic terror groups, would you mind sharing that... thanks.

I know, it's pathetic. And that clown even went and made a thread about it:

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=4224024

Kinda disgraceful how the regressive left leaped on some scraps of misinformation to make it appear that the shooter was a far-right nationalist.

Europe is in the midst of a radical Islam motivated onslaught, and the regressive left are clearly desperate to deflect attention away from it because it doesn't suit their irrelevant agenda, which is pretty unpleasant when you think about it. They're trying to divert attention away from a problem among an immigrant demographic which is killing hundreds and causing huge amounts of terror, to a reactionary problem with European culture/society which currently poses very little danger. It's sort of like a parent ignoring their child's cancer and focusing their attention on the fact that they sometimes get very unpleasant and destructive because of the hysteria the cancer causes. It was fairly obvious that it was never a far right attack. The Breivik attack was targeted at a particular group he was ideologically opposed to. The Joe Cox killing was perpertrated by someone who was ideologically opposed to her. It is Islamic terrorists who kill indiscriminately, so it was fairly obvious who the perp was from the start.

There is ZERO evidence that the shooter was connected to Isis or motivated by religion.
As FoS says, if you have some information that the German police don't. Please do share.

The German police don't exactly have a great record of telling the truth recently.

Do you have evidence that this guy was affiliated to ISIS? Please do share.*

Do you have evidence that this guy was affiliated to ISIS? Please do share.*

Please share where I said he definitely has? I'm just saying don't decide just because someone tells you something that it has to be true especially when the person who is telling you these things have lied about similar things in the past.

Why is everyone still insisting this is linked with Islam if the reports in the news are adamant its not ISIS related?*

Lol, as if you and several others weren't hoping it was a Muslim.

I do wish you'd hold the same standards for both the far right and far left.

Completely agree. I can't believe how much some people are covering up the fact that the attacker was of Iransin descent and shouted Allahu Akbar. I'm pretty sure this was Islamic terrorism.