Psychopath Amanda Knox and the US Media...

OP

Bismarck

I love the British nationalists here: if the suspect's parents are interviewed on American TV and claim their daughter is innocent, that clearly means that the US media is pushing the view that the suspect is innocent. :rolleyes:

I am referring to the hundreds of other programmes and documentaries that omit the dozens of fine points that will eventally put her away. Not just the DNA evidence.

Lets get this straight. They are biased if they refuse to ask the parents any real questions apart from letting them slip into the usual OJ Simpson conspiracy defense: 'the whole Italian legal system is corrupt yada, yada, the evidence was all planted yada, yada, our daughter was tortured into confession yada, yada..'.

What they should ask? Firstly, this question:

Why did Amanda claim to be witness to the murder after the interrogation and point the finger at a completely innocent man as the murderer? And not until it was revealed that he was nowhere near the crime scene did she ever retract the story?

There are more holes in Knox's testimony than a block of swiss cheese, Every single detail of her behaviour and sollecito's during and after is suspect and incoherent compared to her testimony. Just visit this page:

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php?/tjmk/C196/

Reply 24

Bismarck

13

I did not realize that Larry King was "the" US media. Whatever he says (or doesn't say) is clearly the view of all Americans news networks. Thanks for telling me.

Reply 25

Larry King isn't even a journalist; he's a current event-centrist talk show host. Claiming his talk show is representative of the US media at large is just silly.

Reply 26

OP

What about TIME magazine?

What about CNN? What about CBS?

Reply 27

What about it? I saw a clip of Amanda's parents talking to Larry King for 1 minute. And Time magazine is a magazine. It is, by definition, a collection of articles by opinionated writers.

Reply 28

niceguy21

What about TIME magazine?

What about CNN? What about CBS?

Are you just editing your post as you search google for "US news organizations?"

Reply 29

OP

The media is a collection of opinionated writers.

This case has seen some of the most innaccurate reporting of recent years. CBS being some of the worst:

See for yourselves:

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php?/tjmk/C299/

Reply 30

niceguy21

The media is a collection of opinionated writers.

This case has seen some of the most innaccurate reporting of recent years. CBS being some of the worst:

See for yourselves:

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php?/tjmk/C299/

Apart from that being an absurdly crappy site, did you actually read it? Specifically the second entry on the page, entitled "Anti Justice For Meredith Is Increasingly Bad Business," where they explain how on a tabloid show CBS did some crap reporting on the case and had very poor viewership because of it, but how, "in its painstaking report" NBC Dateline "did a wonderful of explaining the case while remaining highly objective?"

You have just proven to me that you have prejudged the US media and are now trying to validate your judgment with various pickings from one month old websites and Youtube videos. You're wasting my time. This will be my last post on this thread.

Reply 31

OP