The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1180
Original post by GPODT
What does sunnah muakkadah mean? Forgive me for my ignorance but I have only started to practice Islam recently

Also, how close is 'close' lol

Jazakallah khair in advance


Sunnah Muakkadah are those actions which Rasulullah always did.

There's a bit more detail on here www.albalagh.net/kids/understanding_deen/Salat.shtml

I'd strongly suggest you talk to your local Imaam in regards to Fiqhi Issues.

This is Behishti Zewar (originally written for the sisters however applies to brothers as well) it's a comprehensive book on the Hanafi Madhab.

Part 1 http://www.islamicbulletin.com/free_downloads/women/bahishti_1_2_3.pdf

Part 2 http://www.islamicbulletin.org/free_downloads/women/bahishti_4_5_6_7.pdf

Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 1181
Original post by GPODT
Also, how close is 'close' lol


I don't know this but I'll try finding out tomorrow Insha Allah...

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Ibn Said
Sunnah Muakkadah are those actions which Rasulullah always did.

There's a bit more detail on here www.albalagh.net/kids/understanding_deen/Salat.shtml

I'd strongly suggest you talk to your local Imaam in regards to Fiqhi Issues.

This is Behishti Zewar (originally written for the sisters however applies to brothers as well) it's a comprehensive book on the Hanafi Madhab.

Part 1 http://www.islamicbulletin.com/free_downloads/women/bahishti_1_2_3.pdf

Part 2 http://www.islamicbulletin.org/free_downloads/women/bahishti_4_5_6_7.pdf

Posted from TSR Mobile


Some Hanifis I know don't consider the Behishti Zewar a reliable scource
Reply 1183
Original post by Marcrey
What do you guys think of Richard Dawkins view that being taught about hell is worse than sexual abuse? Expected or genuinely surprised? I can't provide you with an actual source, as it was recorded and will be shown in December. Working on getting a clip of the debate.


I was surprised but it seems to be something that people expect from Dawkins, I know even Atheists who were disgusted by his comments though.
(edited 11 years ago)
Reply 1184
Original post by getoom
Some Hanifis I know don't consider the Behishti Zewar a reliable scource


That's their problem, read it for yourself and you'll realise it's value... r u a hanafi in fiqh?

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Ibn Said
That's their problem, read it for yourself and you'll realise it's value... r u a hanafi in fiqh?

Posted from TSR Mobile


Shafi, Without bias
Reply 1186
Original post by getoom
Shafi, Without bias


Without bias? What does that mean :s-smilie:
Reply 1187
I assume he means that just because he is Shafi'i in fiqh, he is not biased in favour of the madhab and therefore the kind of person who rejects all other opinions and assumes just the ones from the Shafi'i madhab are correct. But I might be wrong.
Reply 1188
Original post by mel0n
I assume he means that just because he is Shafi'i in fiqh, he is not biased in favour of the madhab and therefore the kind of person who rejects all other opinions and assumes just the ones from the Shafi'i madhab are correct. But I might be wrong.


If you follow a madhab you're basically accepting that whatever the jurists of that madhab say is right.

If he means that all the other madhaahib are also on Haq and they have their evidences to back them up then I'm sure we all agree with that.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 1189
Original post by Ibn Said
If you follow a madhab you're basically accepting that whatever the jurists of that madhab say is right.

If he means that all the other madhaahib are also on Haq and they have their evidences to back them up then I'm sure we all agree with that.

Posted from TSR Mobile


You can accept what they say as being right whilst also acknowledging that other opinions are right too - I assume he means the latter.
(edited 11 years ago)
Original post by ideas4life
I like your honesty when answering that question.

i know some apologists who say muslim women can marry anyone, their is no restrictionn. only liars say it isnt the case....obviouslly thats bogus based on the evidence


Muslim men or women. They can only maryy a muslim women/men :smile:
Original post by ideas4life
If Muhammd is a prophet of peace, why did he say he is a prophet of war?

This is mentioned in Sahifah ibn Munabbih (earliest authentic hadith book)



i'm pretty sure you got wrong info since war is only aloud on the battle field and it is the last option :smile:

Prophet Mohammad (may peace be upon him) promoted peace and happiness read the authentic hadiths if your interested il send you some links..
Reply 1193
Original post by Maryamxx1
Muslim men or women. They can only maryy a muslim women/men :smile:


Muslim men can marry a woman of the book - a Jew or Christian.
Original post by mel0n
I assume he means that just because he is Shafi'i in fiqh, he is not biased in favour of the madhab and therefore the kind of person who rejects all other opinions and assumes just the ones from the Shafi'i madhab are correct. But I might be wrong.


This ^

Original post by Ibn Said
If you follow a madhab you're basically accepting that whatever the jurists of that madhab say is right.

If he means that all the other madhaahib are also on Haq and they have their evidences to back them up then I'm sure we all agree with that.

Posted from TSR Mobile


i mean that all the other madhabs are on the truth but i take opinion from a school if it is deemed to have more evidence for it as in the time of the Imams they may not have had a Hadith that another Imam used to derive a ruling So if i want to know what the ruling is on a specific subject i look at all four schools and the classical scholars to see what the majority say and what their proofs are but this does not mean i legislate for myself or use my own opinion too much or pick and mix from the madhabs to see what is easiest. So my default opinion is that of Imam Shafi

Original post by Tpos
Without bias? What does that mean :s-smilie:
Reply 1195
All madhabs cannot be correct all the time, that's statistically impossible. Hence it is best to rely on the views of contemporary scholars who you trust who will weigh up the evidences.
Original post by noisy06
All madhabs cannot be correct all the time, that's statistically impossible. Hence it is best to rely on the views of contemporary scholars who you trust who will weigh up the evidences.


i did not say there are all correct i meant that they are all on the Right path but that's basically what i do (on of the reasons my default opinion is Shafi is because my local masjid is and i just ask the imam or a sheikh if they have an event)
Reply 1197
Original post by getoom
i did not say there are all correct i meant that they are all on the Right path but that's basically what i do (on of the reasons my default opinion is Shafi is because my local masjid is and i just ask the imam or a sheikh if they have an event)

I wasn't talking to anyone in particular. I was speaking generally. Following the Shafi masjid is fantastic. I've been to Shafi mosques before, they're generally not rigid and they usually try to follow the most textually-backed opinions. Whereas Hanafi mosques can be pretty firm, even when their opinions are incorrect.
Original post by noisy06
I wasn't talking to anyone in particular. I was speaking generally. Following the Shafi masjid is fantastic. I've been to Shafi mosques before, they're generally not rigid and they usually try to follow the most textually-backed opinions. Whereas Hanafi mosques can be pretty firm, even when their opinions are incorrect.


cool, my mistake
Reply 1199
Original post by noisy06
I wasn't talking to anyone in particular. I was speaking generally. Following the Shafi masjid is fantastic. I've been to Shafi mosques before, they're generally not rigid and they usually try to follow the most textually-backed opinions. Whereas Hanafi mosques can be pretty firm, even when their opinions are incorrect.


What madhab do you follow if you don't mind me asking?

The reason different madhaahib exist is because they had differences of opinion on different issues.

To imply that Hanafi's don't have textual-backed opinions goes a long way to show that you don't know much about it. Try reading I'laa us Sunan, or even Hidayah, or Adilatil Hanafiyyah or Al Ikhtiyaar li Ta'leel il Mukhtaar or read through Hanafi usool if you have the ability to.

Istinbaat wasn't done by a person sat searching for fataawa on Google, rather Imaam Abu Haneefah had a council of approximately 40 Ulama who were experts in different knowledges and they'd be sat there debating/solving different Masaail, at times over a period of months.

From what I've read so far, any argument that has been placed against a ruling of Hanafi's has been answered. So to say that 'even when their opinions are incorrect' wouldn't seem to hold. Could you give me one example please?

I'm not saying the other madhaahib don't have any evidences. Read Shaykh Zakariyya Kandhlawi's 'Differences of the Imaams'. He has explained it very nicely and clearly.

Another point to keep in mind is that once you follow one madhab you do not have the right to switch or pick 'n mix - as that will be done according to your desires - unless you have the level of knowledge required to be a mujtahid, which is not an easy feat. (The reason for such requirements is pretty simple, deen is not a toy that can be played around with and taken advantage of.)

If I've misunderstood you please do correct me.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Latest

Trending

Trending