The Student Room Group

The Trans*/Non-Cisgender Thread

Scroll to see replies

Reply 180
Original post by Ruthie!
Does it not hurt though? Or (personal question sorry) are they not particularly big in the first place?


In my experience, binding is quite painful but also quite necessary.

The first few weeks of wearing my binder, I was out of breath ALL THE TIME. Going up stairs, running, even walking fast, ANYTHING. It was worse than a corset. Now it's not, but it still makes it hard to exercise. My ribs also end up hurting (I bind from when I get dressed in a morning to when I go to bed on a night, so 15+ hours per day) and generally, it is rather uncomfortable.

However, mine was second-hand off a transguy who's five inches smaller than me and a fair bit lighter, so there we go :teehee: Desperation and being poor, eh?

Spoiler

Original post by kerily
In my experience, binding is quite painful but also quite necessary.

The first few weeks of wearing my binder, I was out of breath ALL THE TIME. Going up stairs, running, even walking fast, ANYTHING. It was worse than a corset. Now it's not, but it still makes it hard to exercise. My ribs also end up hurting (I bind from when I get dressed in a morning to when I go to bed on a night, so 15+ hours per day) and generally, it is rather uncomfortable.

However, mine was second-hand off a transguy who's five inches smaller than me and a fair bit lighter, so there we go :teehee: Desperation and being poor, eh?

Spoiler


This may be a strange observation but you look so... Nordic.
Reply 182
Original post by kerily
In my experience, binding is quite painful but also quite necessary.


You look amazing in the photo. :yep:

As for what I've left of the quote, I want to ask "why"? Most of us in here agree that gender is a construct of some form (though I've just read an interesting article on that by Judith Butler), so why do transfolk wish to change their bodies? Genitalia aside, why are we tying gender and physicality back together, after having separated them? Why should a man have a flat chest? I don't at the moment, and I know one cisgendered male who had a fully functioning mammary gland and breast. Just the one, though. :s-smilie: He's one of the most "masculine" men I know.

I'm not getting at you or anyone who wants to change their body to be more gender appropriate, I'm just curious, because despite my genderneutrality, I feel no desire to make my body match.
Reply 183
Original post by najinaji
This may be a strange observation but you look so... Nordic.


I'm not Nordic by descent :holmes: I have a lot of German relatives, but the other half are English and Irish. (Plus that's bleached hair, I'm naturally mouse :ahee:)

Original post by Hylean
You look amazing in the photo. :yep:


:colondollar: Thankyou :biggrin:

As for what I've left of the quote, I want to ask "why"? Most of us in here agree that gender is a construct of some form (though I've just read an interesting article on that by Judith Butler), so why do transfolk wish to change their bodies? Genitalia aside, why are we tying gender and physicality back together, after having separated them? Why should a man have a flat chest? I don't at the moment, and I know one cisgendered male who had a fully functioning mammary gland and breast. Just the one, though. :s-smilie: He's one of the most "masculine" men I know.

I'm not getting at you or anyone who wants to change their body to be more gender appropriate, I'm just curious, because despite my genderneutrality, I feel no desire to make my body match.


I don't believe gender to be a construct; I believe gender to be something that people inherently feel (or not, if they identify as gender-neutral/agender/etc). I see it rather that gender roles, and the idea that there's a perfect correlation between genitalia/chromosomes/etc and gender, is the construct.

I don't know exactly why I wish for surgery and facial hair and the like. But... my body feels deeply wrong as it is. I suspect some of it is to do with being read properly in public (being addressed as female ****s me off something chronic, and that happens if you appear female-bodied) but it's not just that; I want to feel comfortable with my own body, and for reasons unknown, I just don't with it in its present state. I don't get it either, basically, but I do feel it :tongue:
Original post by kerily
In my experience, binding is quite painful but also quite necessary.

The first few weeks of wearing my binder, I was out of breath ALL THE TIME. Going up stairs, running, even walking fast, ANYTHING. It was worse than a corset. Now it's not, but it still makes it hard to exercise. My ribs also end up hurting (I bind from when I get dressed in a morning to when I go to bed on a night, so 15+ hours per day) and generally, it is rather uncomfortable.

However, mine was second-hand off a transguy who's five inches smaller than me and a fair bit lighter, so there we go :teehee: Desperation and being poor, eh?

Spoiler



you look awesome :smile:
Reply 185
Original post by kerily
I don't believe gender to be a construct; I believe gender to be something that people inherently feel (or not, if they identify as gender-neutral/agender/etc). I see it rather that gender roles, and the idea that there's a perfect correlation between genitalia/chromosomes/etc and gender, is the construct.

I don't know exactly why I wish for surgery and facial hair and the like. But... my body feels deeply wrong as it is. I suspect some of it is to do with being read properly in public (being addressed as female ****s me off something chronic, and that happens if you appear female-bodied) but it's not just that; I want to feel comfortable with my own body, and for reasons unknown, I just don't with it in its present state. I don't get it either, basically, but I do feel it :tongue:


Fair enough, but then why do you feel male if what being male actually is, is a social construct beyond physical identifiers? That's where I come from in the debate really. If the identifiers are a social construct, then it follows the identity itself is a construct of some form. This viewpoint obviously falls flat in the face of transfolk, but I'd suggest then that that is a physical rather than mental thing, which I guess semi-answers my question. If what people who wish to change sex do it based on physicality, it makes sense they'd want to change the rest of their body as well to fit in with the physical norms.

Oh, I hope no one thinks I'm getting at them, I'm just curious. As I mentioned elsewhere, I really want to break the bond between gender and sex, something we in here do, but I want to go further so that a guy is not defined by a flat chest or muscles and a woman isn't defined by hips and breasts, etc.
Original post by Hylean
Fair enough, but then why do you feel male if what being male actually is, is a social construct beyond physical identifiers? That's where I come from in the debate really. If the identifiers are a social construct, then it follows the identity itself is a construct of some form. This viewpoint obviously falls flat in the face of transfolk, but I'd suggest then that that is a physical rather than mental thing, which I guess semi-answers my question. If what people who wish to change sex do it based on physicality, it makes sense they'd want to change the rest of their body as well to fit in with the physical norms.

Oh, I hope no one thinks I'm getting at them, I'm just curious. As I mentioned elsewhere, I really want to break the bond between gender and sex, something we in here do, but I want to go further so that a guy is not defined by a flat chest or muscles and a woman isn't defined by hips and breasts, etc.


I'm really against the 'gender is a social construct' idea. I'm of the view that it is most likely that gender is a biological setting and is fairly resistant to social influences.

Certain makes a lot more sense with transgenderism.

A guy is not defined by their flat chest, sure. I have made the decision to remain vaginaed, even though my gender is completely binary. I guess it's better to think of all the markers as a whole, and different people will find different markers important. This counts for cisgendered people too - consider the males who dance without fear of damaging their masculinity. And, importantly, there are cismales who would refuse to participate in ballet because that marker is important to them. They may be clean-shaven, whereas Mr Dancer may find that a beard is an important aspect of his masculinity. Gender markers become non-universal and amorphous, but most people have a clear and binary definition of how they perceive their own gender (although there are exceptions to that rule).
What I'm trying to say is that however much you may say that masculinity is not defined by a flat chest, and I believe you'd be correct in saying so, I also think that masculinity is defined by a flat chest among individuals who happen to have given importance to that gender marker.

I hope I'm making some sort of sense, I'm not sure I am, not even to myself. I'm trying to explain to myself why some physical things (e.g. flat-chestedness) are an all-important definition of who I am, and why other things (e.g. genitalia) are not.
Original post by kerily
In my experience, binding is quite painful but also quite necessary.

The first few weeks of wearing my binder, I was out of breath ALL THE TIME. Going up stairs, running, even walking fast, ANYTHING. It was worse than a corset. Now it's not, but it still makes it hard to exercise. My ribs also end up hurting (I bind from when I get dressed in a morning to when I go to bed on a night, so 15+ hours per day) and generally, it is rather uncomfortable.

However, mine was second-hand off a transguy who's five inches smaller than me and a fair bit lighter, so there we go :teehee: Desperation and being poor, eh?

Spoiler



you look awesome man :yy:

My binder never felt uncomfy even at the start :s-smilie: maybe I'm wearing the wrong size. I am planning to go a size smaller when i buy another one though. Not happy with having so much still showing (it might not seem much but in my head it's huge and obvious I have chesticles)
Reply 188
Ok guys, so I fell asleep in my binder a couple of hours ago. I've just woken up, and taken it off, but my chest is all tight and panic attack-y. I'm not sure whether this is the effect of the binder, or it's the effect of panic. It's one or the other, and tbh, probably both.

Will I die? (This is a completly serious question.) I really don't want to have to explain to anyone why I'm dying, and I'm actually quite scared and just rambling on. Surely my chest will re-expand or something? I don't even know if this is an effect of the binder, because I'm having a panic attack, so it might just be that, and. ****. I really dislike this feeling.

But seriously, have any of you experienced this, and did you die?
Reply 189
Original post by ZZ9
Ok guys, so I fell asleep in my binder a couple of hours ago. I've just woken up, and taken it off, but my chest is all tight and panic attack-y. I'm not sure whether this is the effect of the binder, or it's the effect of panic. It's one or the other, and tbh, probably both.

Will I die? (This is a completly serious question.) I really don't want to have to explain to anyone why I'm dying, and I'm actually quite scared and just rambling on. Surely my chest will re-expand or something? I don't even know if this is an effect of the binder, because I'm having a panic attack, so it might just be that, and. ****. I really dislike this feeling.

But seriously, have any of you experienced this, and did you die?


If you're having a panic attack (legitimately), I would recommend getting off the internet and trying instead to focus on your breathing so that you calm yourself down.

You will not die because you slept in a binder for a couple of hours. I wear mine for 15+ hours daily, and it's substantially too small for me, and I am yet to expire. Yours fits and you've only had it on a little while. Yes, they're restrictive, so take it off at the moment, but you're not going to die.
Reply 190
Original post by kerily
If you're having a panic attack (legitimately), I would recommend getting off the internet and trying instead to focus on your breathing so that you calm yourself down.

You will not die because you slept in a binder for a couple of hours. I wear mine for 15+ hours daily, and it's substantially too small for me, and I am yet to expire. Yours fits and you've only had it on a little while. Yes, they're restrictive, so take it off at the moment, but you're not going to die.


That's probably a good idea. But the thought of dying makes it hard to breathe, and I needed to find out. That makes sense to me, but doesn't sound like it.

:smile: Thankyou. I know that it sounds daft- I wore it all day without dying, but.. ehh, panic isn't rational.
Original post by ZZ9
That's probably a good idea. But the thought of dying makes it hard to breathe, and I needed to find out. That makes sense to me, but doesn't sound like it.

:smile: Thankyou. I know that it sounds daft- I wore it all day without dying, but.. ehh, panic isn't rational.

I've been there when it comes to panicking for no reason. :tongue: Hope you're all right now.
Reply 192
Original post by lightburns
I'm really against the 'gender is a social construct' idea. I'm of the view that it is most likely that gender is a biological setting and is fairly resistant to social influences.

Certain makes a lot more sense with transgenderism.

A guy is not defined by their flat chest, sure. I have made the decision to remain vaginaed, even though my gender is completely binary. I guess it's better to think of all the markers as a whole, and different people will find different markers important. This counts for cisgendered people too - consider the males who dance without fear of damaging their masculinity. And, importantly, there are cismales who would refuse to participate in ballet because that marker is important to them. They may be clean-shaven, whereas Mr Dancer may find that a beard is an important aspect of his masculinity. Gender markers become non-universal and amorphous, but most people have a clear and binary definition of how they perceive their own gender (although there are exceptions to that rule).
What I'm trying to say is that however much you may say that masculinity is not defined by a flat chest, and I believe you'd be correct in saying so, I also think that masculinity is defined by a flat chest among individuals who happen to have given importance to that gender marker.

I hope I'm making some sort of sense, I'm not sure I am, not even to myself. I'm trying to explain to myself why some physical things (e.g. flat-chestedness) are an all-important definition of who I am, and why other things (e.g. genitalia) are not.


You raise some valid points, but the very points you're making show that it's all a construct. If flat-chestedness, say, isn't considered everywhere a symbol of malehood, then it must be a construct by virtue of being a socialised or culturalised signifier. Moreover, there are cultures out there where there is no gender binary at all, but 3 or more sometimes. That we in our culture have a clear cut gender binary, though the boundary is different with each person, doesn't make gender less of a construct.

I don't think that we go out there and choose a gender identity and then proceed to build it up. Just that gender identity isn't innate to us from birth.

For example, it is perfectly plausible that my androgyne-ness comes from the fact I grew up in a heavily female dominated family but went to an all male school.

That said, I'm no psychologist, so this could all be bull****. :colondollar:

Why does a penis matter less to you than a flat-chest, if I might ask such a personal question?


Original post by ZZ9
That's probably a good idea. But the thought of dying makes it hard to breathe, and I needed to find out. That makes sense to me, but doesn't sound like it.

:smile: Thankyou. I know that it sounds daft- I wore it all day without dying, but.. ehh, panic isn't rational.


You'll be fine. People who corset train often fall asleep with the corset on. Don't forget, when asleep, we breathe at a shallower rhythm.
(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by Hylean
You raise some valid points, but the very points you're making show that it's all a construct. If flat-chestedness, say, isn't considered everywhere a symbol of malehood, then it must be a construct by virtue of being a socialised or culturalised signifier. Moreover, there are cultures out there where there is no gender binary at all, but 3 or more sometimes. That we in our culture have a clear cut gender binary, though the boundary is different with each person, doesn't make gender less of a construct.

I don't think that we go out there and choose a gender identity and then proceed to build it up. Just that gender identity isn't innate to us from birth.

For example, it is perfectly plausible that my androgyne-ness comes from the fact I grew up in a heavily female dominated family but went to an all male school.

That said, I'm no psychologist, so this could all be bull****. :colondollar:

Why does a penis matter less to you than a flat-chest, if I might ask such a personal question?


Okay, then I thin which particular markers are important IS a construct. You're right to pick me up on that point, thanks for noticing because I was in a wander and hadn't noticed. However, there's still a categorical biological distinction between the genders, which cannot be distinguished by one particular marker. That said, I could be talking bull****. I just think it's more likely that there is a biological difference between genders than it all being a construct at the baseline. It may be just a predisposition which is affected by socialness and environment, but I still think that for the most part, it'll be innate

I'm not a very sexual person. I guess that I am aromantic, I think that's the term, to mean that I have no interest in getting close to people and having relationships etc. I would have sex and enjoy it, but frankly, it's not worth putting any effort into to try and get it. Having so little focus on relationships and the sexual side of life has probably seeped into how I see genitals. I have a "you stay out of my way, and I'll stay out of yours" relationship with my vagina. And it seems to work okay, vaginas are the ones without all the bits and pieces attached, so I barely notice it's there.
Flat-chestedness matters because I've internalised the idea that breasts are beacons of I'm-a-woman. I know they are not to everyone, but that's what my breasts meant to me. A flat chest was my way of showing my outer body "hah, you're wrong".

I think it's also possible that maybe transgendered people who are binary could have a different cause than those who are androgynous. Perfectly possible that this isn't, but something worth considering.. So, people could be born innate the other, but gender being fluid enough to be affected to a degree. I see that it must be explained why most people are cisgendered, and you see far more tomboys than transboys. It suggests to me that there is something beyond the behavioural, to possibly innate things. People do push the boundaries in gender-specific behaviours, and maybe people like you are extreme cases of this? Or, of course, you could be another type of innateness. Who knows. I'm in wandering brain mode, I really should think of these things, then post it later once I've looked it over and checked for discrepancies like you've already found... :P

By the way, I'm just interested. Feel free to not answer this question if you don't want to (I understand if you don't want anyone to judge you based on that, as I will never tell anyone my birth-name for that reason). Which outer-body sex were you born to?
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 194
Original post by najinaji
I've been there when it comes to panicking for no reason. :tongue: Hope you're all right now.


Yeah, I've calmed down a lot. Siiiigh. I dislike panic :frown:

Original post by Hylean
You'll be fine. People who corset train often fall asleep with the corset on. Don't forget, when asleep, we breathe at a shallower rhythm.


Thanks :smile: My chest is less sore now that I've stopped going "I'm going to die, I'm going to die, oh God, I'm going to die. Should I tell someone? What if no one notices and I rot in my room?" etc :tongue:

--

Re the social construct discussion, I know very little about the theoretical side of things, but as far as my experience/opinion goes, gender is both innate and a social construct. I mean, there are innate things we are predisposed to, but as a society, we've assigned genders to them.

For example, when I was little, I liked to play with Lego and also with dolls. Two perfectly typical things, but they're apparently for 'opposite' genders. It just.. makes little sense. For me, transition is about feeling more comfortable in the world and just being.. more like the person I am in my head.

Mind you, my explanation does nothing to address the want to change myself physically. Hrm.
Tried to book an appointment to see my GP three times now and haven't been able to... Grrr...
Reply 196
Anyone still around here? :tongue:

I've had another counselling session and it was good :biggrin: I've talked about things, and thought about things and it's good :smile:
Original post by ZZ9
Anyone still around here? :tongue:

I've had another counselling session and it was good :biggrin: I've talked about things, and thought about things and it's good :smile:


yes - im still around, :smile: although not much time to post recently...

& good to hear about your counselling session, sounds very usefull :smile:
Original post by ZZ9
Anyone still around here? :tongue:

I've had another counselling session and it was good :biggrin: I've talked about things, and thought about things and it's good :smile:


Good is good, so nice to hear your counselling session went well. What kind of things did you talk about?

Mine were always fairly pointless. Always had bad counselling people (really bad), and after a while I started lying to them anyway. Was easier that way. Now I go to Dr Curtis, a private guy, every 6 months. And he has to be good, because I give him money.
Reply 199
Original post by fallen_acorns
yes - im still around, :smile: although not much time to post recently...

& good to hear about your counselling session, sounds very usefull :smile:


Glad to hear it, and I hope you've been busy with good things :smile:

:biggrin: I'm happy that I went to them. I spent the first session going "nooooo, no talking" :tongue: but today's was more positive.

Original post by lightburns
Good is good, so nice to hear your counselling session went well. What kind of things did you talk about?

Mine were always fairly pointless. Always had bad counselling people (really bad), and after a while I started lying to them anyway. Was easier that way. Now I go to Dr Curtis, a private guy, every 6 months. And he has to be good, because I give him money.


Mainly things like coming out to my family. I've figured (I think) how I'm going to tell my parents, and we talked about worst case scenarios and things.

:frown: I think it's just luck, unfortunately. The lady I'm speaking to is good, and that's.. good. I think I'm going to have to sort something else out though- the uni counselling is short term only (up to six sessions). But by the time it finishes, I'll have seen a psychiatrist, so hopefully they'll be able to help me sort something :smile:

Quick Reply

Latest