Science-heavy medical course in the UK?

Imperial, nothing for the faint hearted.

I heard that St Andrews science coverage is still iffy. Nowhere at Oxbridge, Edinburgh or London level.

Edinburgh is pretty light on the science, brah.

Are you an Edinbrah?

I'm applying for GEM next year and wondering the same question as everybody else in this thread. Looks like Ox, Cam, Imp and UCL are the way to go

Imperial, nothing for the faint hearted.

I heard that St Andrews science coverage is still iffy. Nowhere at Oxbridge, Edinburgh or London level.

St. Andrews is basically biomed as they have **** all in the way of clinical facilities.

My life would be so much easier were this true.

Edit: But yes, OP; pretty much the universities with an in-built BSc (so a six-year course as standard)

As a note, Edinburgh currently intend to make their course a 6 year with a mandatory BSc, but the science content of the first 2 years is unlikely to change. Breaks that rule of thumb.

Oh really? Didn't know that!

Any reason why? (Trying to decrease applicant numbers? )

As a note, Edinburgh currently intend to make their course a 6 year with a mandatory BSc, but the science content of the first 2 years is unlikely to change. Breaks that rule of thumb.

For which cycle of applicants is this for?

Also, do they have any intentions of starting to interview candidates?

LOL. No, even though their decisions over the past year might indicate so.

I had a chat with one of the admissions committee about it, and I was told they just think it'd make better clinical students graduates to have the more rigorous academic background. I asked why they think its advantageous enough to warrant making every student do it, but I can't remember the answer I got back!