So it was the rebels who used the chemical weapons, US lies again?

The US, lying? You must be mistaken...

Can you reference the actual lie?
Thanks.

That's not a lie. They were just wrong!

For example, I could conclude from this thread that although your intention was to be interesting you are an idiot. I might be wrong but I wouldn't be lying. It's a deduction I made.

If you look into politics, you will know this is not the first time the US has accused a government of having 'weapons' or 'using weapons'.

Iraq 2003 - Saddam has WMD'S

Assad 2013 - He used chemical weapons - we are confident.

Can you not see there are all pretexts?

Do you think they made an innocent mistake?

Even Ron Paul called the evidence Obama used to 'conclude' bogus.

I'm not going to pass judgement on the US' claim that it was Assad who used chemical weapons, but can you seriously not see the huge flaw in comparing this situation to Iraq and the WMDs? One actually happened, one didn't.

The US, lying? You must be mistaken...

The OP has quoted a Russia Today news article. The same Russia Today that is financed by the Russian Government.

The same government the backs Assads regime in Syria and has also just annexed part of the Ukraine.

I've often wondered who the weak minded are who fall for another states propaganda.

You probably support the (largely foreign) Islamist extremist so called 'rebels'.

The Russian government finances RT, but let's not pretend the media in the West isn't dominated by corporate interests and corrupted by the likes of Murdoch.

Most of the people in Crimea are ethnic-Russians and their first language is mainly Russian. A democratically elected government was overthrown and replaced with one that immediately removed Russian as an official language of Ukraine. Now that adds context, lets look at the referendum results: roughly 97% voted to join Russia with a voter turnout of over 80%. Despite the rather limited options in the referendum (join Russia or revert to 1992 constitution) a result that overwhelming cannot be ignored.

Russia has supported military action in two country's that it has a strategic interest in. both of which have Russian military naval bases in. Funny that.

If you look into politics, you will know this is not the first time the US has accused a government of having 'weapons' or 'using weapons'.

Funny how you ignored everything else I wrote.

None of this confirms the use of WMD's on the 21st of August was carried out by the rebels. I thought it was already well known that various rebel groups in Syria had gained possession of chemical weapons. I don't really see why it is not plausible that both the rebels and the government in Syria have been using Sarin. Given the sophistication of the attack on the 21st and the fact that the rockets used originated from government held territory I do not find it convincing at all that the major use of chemical weapons was carried out by the rebels and not the government.

A team of security and arms experts, meeting this week in Washington to discuss the matter, has concluded that the range of the rocket that delivered sarin in the largest attack that night was too short for the device to have been fired from the Syrian government positions where the Obama administration insists they originated.

Source? This suggests otherwise.

Funny how you ignored everything else I wrote.

Speaking of military bases...

The OP has quoted a Russia Today news article. The same Russia Today that is financed by the Russian Government.

The same government the backs Assads regime in Syria and has also just annexed part of the Ukraine.

I've often wondered who the weak minded are who fall for another states propaganda.