Where is the feminist outrage over what happened in Rotherham?

They keep going on about imaginary rape culture in universities (caused by silly pop songs and 'lad banter'), but ignore a real 'rape culture' where young girls are groomed by men and passed around without impunity.

The men guilty of these crimes were predominately of Pakistani hertiage. Of course their ethnicity isn't to blame but rather primitive cultural and religion aspects that most Pakistani Brits have shook off. Modern feminists seem to let them of the hook because they are non-white or foreign.

Except that this is 21st century Britian, not Pakistan in the Middle Ages. Under no circumstances is it ever acceptable to sexually abuse a child in this country regardless of your 'cultural practices'.

Our culture constantly exploits women and treats them as mere objects of pleasure. Islam is actually very respectful of women and it's important that they are treated like precious jewels, rather than mere objects for men to gawp at. It's worth noting that in countries such as Saudi Arabia, domestic abuse and rape is much rarer than in Western countries.

Denial?! I want to wait for the facts before I pass judgement, I'm not denying it happened! It clearly happend to some extent because people have been charged with statutory rape

Our culture constantly exploits women and treats them as mere objects of pleasure. Islam is actually very respectful of women and it's important that they are treated like precious jewels, rather than mere objects for men to gawp at. It's worth noting that in countries such as Saudi Arabia, domestic abuse and rape is much rarer than in Western countries.

Meanwhile Pakistan is the world's leader in child abuse, rape porn and child porn. Women are oppressed in Islam.

You've got the facts.

There was the CEOP study in 2011/2012, which concluded that Pakistani men were massively overrepresented in the grooming statistics.

http://www.ceop.police.uk/


The recent report by Professor Alexis Jay found that lmost all the predators were men of Pakistani and Kashmiri origin, while the majority of their victims were white.

There have been other reports which have found that there is massive overepreseentation of Pakistani men in the gang paedophile statistics.

These reports have been accepted not only by governmetn agencise right across the board, but also by Rotherham council, the police and the social services. You do not accept these reports, and you seem to deny them any validity at all, without giving any evidence whatsoever to back up your position.

Why?

And I know countless people from Rochdale (where this sort of thing was going on for years) who told me that Pakistani men had a problem with child sex, and that many paedophiles in the town were of Pakistani descent. One woman I knew, her teenage daugther was approched by some of them.

Not all Pakistanis are like this, the vast majority are not. but there is a subculture here where it is seen as OK to haev sex with children.

But still the denial goes on. And more children will suffer as a result.

That is not Islam, that is just a very small part of Pakistani culture. And how is it so much worse than our culture, where we have lads mags called 'ZOO' where women are degraded and are plastered over it's pages like pieces of meat, or where pornography is totally legal and accepted, or where we have clubs where men can go along and gawp at naked women like they only exist to make their pricks erect?

That is not Islam, that is just a very small part of Pakistani culture. And how is it so much worse than our culture, where we have lads mags called 'ZOO' where women are degraded and are plastered over it's pages like pieces of meat, or where pornography is totally legal and accepted, or where we have clubs where men can go along and gawp at naked women like they only exist to make their pricks erect?

You're comparing a magazine where women are paid (and they willingly do as a career) to show off their bodies, to child porn where children are brutally raped? And because in the Western world our women are free to dress and act how they want instead of walking about oppressed and dressed like a letterbox that they are only there to "make men's pricks erect"? I call it that we live in a free society where people are free to live their lives, regardless of gender or sexual orientation. To have the gall to compare that to the rape of children is utterly vile.

They keep going on about imaginary rape culture in universities (caused by silly pop songs and 'lad banter'), but ignore a real 'rape culture' where young girls are groomed by men and passed around without impunity.

The men guilty of these crimes were predominately of Pakistani hertiage. Of course their ethnicity isn't to blame but rather primitive cultural and religion aspects that most Pakistani Brits have shook off. Modern feminists seem to let them of the hook because they are non-white or foreign.

That is not Islam, that is just a very small part of Pakistani culture. And how is it so much worse than our culture, where we have lads mags called 'ZOO' where women are degraded and are plastered over it's pages like pieces of meat, or where pornography is totally legal and accepted, or where we have clubs where men can go along and gawp at naked women like they only exist to make their pricks erect?

Don't get me started on the thing about Muhammed (PBUH) I can rant about that for hours, he isn't a pedo, do your research.

But onto your other points - a lot of that comes into what I said about education level.

Women only dress how they do in this society because they feel pressured to by men.

Firstly, considering the majority of the victims are said to be white British females, I find your viewpoint quite astonishing.

It has already been proven by the report that a substantial amount of those responsible were of Pakistani origin. Are you trying to deny facts here that have been presented in this rather damning and disturbing report?

Lets have a look at extracts taken from different news sources.

The Sky news article says:


There was “denial” that such events could happen in Rotherham and issues of ethnicity were “played down” by senior managers. "Almost all" the perpetrators were described by victims as being of Pakistani origin, but the authorities "wanted to play down ethnic dimensions... for fear of being thought racist."

On the other hand, the BBC article changed from Pakistani to Asian which is quite frankly disgusting but I expect nothing else from them considering their quite obvious left wing bias. If almost all of the perpetrators are, according to the report, described as Pakistani, then why is the term Asian being used?

It is actually insulting to use the term Asian in this instance. Tell me when you last heard of a Malaysian, Chinese or Japanese pedophile ring? I haven't in the UK. It comes across as nothing more than an obvious attempt at using a politically correct term to not cause offence to Pakistanis. Its absolutely absurd.

They actually won't state fact because of political correctness, it appears. Political correctness needs to die.

No one is letting them off the hook? Obviously what happened is disgusting.

However don't you dare try to say Pakistani culture is "rapey". The vast majority of Pakistanis are as against rape as anyone.

Our culture constantly exploits women and treats them as mere objects of pleasure. Islam is actually very respectful of women and it's important that they are treated like precious jewels, rather than mere objects for men to gawp at. It's worth noting that in countries such as Saudi Arabia, domestic abuse and rape is much rarer than in Western countries.