New 9/11 Documentary

Another motive would be that if prior knowledge was gained, the building was set up to be demolished before the attacks, so that it could be brought down for insurance purposes. It is reported that Silverstein (the owner) won $861 million from his insurance regarding WTC7.

This one has been debunked. He spent it all building the new WTC7, that cost $700 million to build. And he lost 5 years of office rent from the old building, which amounts to approx $200 million. Pretty pointless to demolish a perfectly good building(it was only 14 years old) if you're just going to build a new one straight away, wouldn't you agree?

By the way, he did not admit demolition. 'Pull' is not used to describe explosive demolition, it is a firefighting term. If he admitted it - why aren't the insurance companies prosecuting him for massive fraud?

The way they blatantly ignore the truth and publicize their idiotic "findings" despite requests by the relatives of the dead shows that they care more about living in their conspiratorial world than they do about fellow human beings.

You don't understand something, therefore there is a conspiracy at work. Brilliant logic.

Of course not, but the evidence against the american government is much larger than that of Bin Laden, and even more believable. I have watched documentaries that prove that it is scientificaly, and mathamaticaly impossible for the towers to have collapsed just by the planes and the proceeding fires. Also it has been proved that the phone calls from flight 93 were false (actors) as there is something like a 0.0009 chance of a mobile phone working in a plane at that altitude, and somehow at least 5 people managed it? Im not going to ramble on about all the evidence as i would have a large thesis on my hands.

Oh. My. God.

Not again!



Can't believe I'm quoting myself

Have you ever heard of a well known tool of reasoning called a brain?

And it's rather odd, that every time Bush lies about something minor, someone leaks the truth. But when he "lies" about the murder of 3,000 American citizens, everyone keeps silent.

Look, I don't want to get into a flame war over this, but FOR F**KS SAKE, you need to start THINKING and not reading some unscientific opinion writted by people with nothing better to do. The evidence is circumstantial at best for christ's sake!

No I didn't. I've seen umpteen conspiracy documentaries and none seem to be able to change the fact that the official version of events, backed up by the finest minds in the world and god knows how many other people, is the most likely sequence of events.

It's really not meant to be funny, and I've not seen one coherent argument against the message it conveys; Can you think of one?

Of course not, but the evidence against the american government is much larger than that of Bin Laden, and even more believable. I have watched documentaries that prove that it is scientificaly, and mathamaticaly impossible for the towers to have collapsed just by the planes and the proceeding fires. Also it has been proved that the phone calls from flight 93 were false (actors) as there is something like a 0.0009 chance of a mobile phone working in a plane at that altitude, and somehow at least 5 people managed it? Im not going to ramble on about all the evidence as i would have a large thesis on my hands.

The way they blatantly ignore the truth and publicize their idiotic "findings" despite requests by the relatives of the dead shows that they care more about living in their conspiratorial world than they do about fellow human beings.