The Student Room Group

AQA GCSE/Level 2 qualification in Further Maths UNOFFICIAL MARK SCHEME

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Bobby21231
No I think it means just showing the limiting value. Here is an example question from a calculator paper


That's quite easy and nice, why couldn't they have put a question like that in the non-calculator exam? :frown:
Original post by asmuse123
That's quite easy and nice, why couldn't they have put a question like that in the non-calculator exam? :frown:


I know it's pretty simple let's hope they put it in the calculator paper :smile:
Original post by Bobby21231
These are some of the topics my teacher thought may come up as they weren't in the first one

sequences - linear/quadratic/limiting value as n tends to infinity
simultaneous equations - quadratic/circle
factor theorem
quadratic inequalities
distance between 2 points
equation of a circle
circle theorems (maybe a slightly nicer question!!)
solving trig. equations/trig. graphs
matrix transformations
Pythagoras' theorem/SOHCAHTOA
3D trigonometry
sine & cosine rules/area of a triangle
drawing a graph given the domains and the range (the opposite of the question in paper 1)
show why sin(30) = 1/2 etc
algebraic proof
index laws


Thankssss!
Anyone know if I'll still get marks for maths that I've scribbled out?
Somebody has forgotten the question on rearranging? Would someone be able to answer it for me? Thanks,
Original post by Olmeister
Somebody has forgotten the question on rearranging? Would someone be able to answer it for me? Thanks,

No it's question number 12
It was that one number for christ sake
Original post by Soundslikeachair
Anyone know if I'll still get marks for maths that I've scribbled out?


As long as they can read what is under the scribbles, then yes- if you went a bit mad, and scribbled it out until it resembled a black smudge, then no.
Original post by ReeJess99
As long as they can read what is under the scribbles, then yes- if you went a bit mad, and scribbled it out until it resembled a black smudge, then no.


I set it on fire.
Original post by Soundslikeachair
I set it on fire.


Ah, well, they'll definitely be able to read the cinders then :smile:
Original post by ReeJess99
Ah, well, they'll definitely be able to read the cinders then :smile:


Yeah, I scribbled those out too.
Original post by Soundslikeachair
Yeah, I scribbled those out too.


You are incorrigible! yet.... vaguely amusing... the exams really have taken a toll on me... :frown:
Original post by ♥samantha♥
5a) in the expansion of (x+2)(x^2+kx-3) the coefficient of x^2 is 0. Work out the value of k

6) no. Of red balls = 5x; no. Of blue balls = 2x
red decreased by 20%
blue increased by 30%
the difference now is 35 balls, work out the value of x

7) i dont remember it soz...but it was an identity i think
14) write in the form where w and k are integers

16) by factorising, simplify this fraction:

17) prove that

thankyou so much!
Original post by ReeJess99
You are incorrigible! yet.... vaguely amusing... the exams really have taken a toll on me... :frown:


Join the club, my friend :smile:
Pretty standard Paper 2 in my judgement. I Imagine A^ will be about 89/105 for that (same as last year), but probably about 53/70 for Paper 1.
Original post by Muaaz98
Pretty standard Paper 2 in my judgement. I Imagine A^ will be about 89/105 for that (same as last year), but probably about 53/70 for Paper 1.


Do you know the total marks needed for an A*?
Original post by blitzchika
Do you know the total marks needed for an A*?

Well last year it was 114/175 for an A* (46 in Paper 1, 68 in Paper 2).
I imagine it will a bit lower this year given how rigorous that Paper 1 was, probably about 111/175 for an A*.
Original post by Muaaz98
Well last year it was 114/175 for an A* (46 in Paper 1, 68 in Paper 2).
I imagine it will a bit lower this year given how rigorous that Paper 1 was, probably about 111/175 for an A*.


Ah I see thanks
Reply 118
Will anyone make an unofficial mark scheme?

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending