Is it fair to blame Muslims for terror attacks?

Why are There no Jaïn terrorists ? Perhaps, because the religion is actually peaceful ?

There are about 1.6 billion muslims in the world , 20% of them are terrorists. The majority of the muslim population are average people with different beliefs. To say that ALL muslims are responsible is like saying white people are responsible for donald trump boming syria. Most of the population of muslims dont actually agree with isis or the act of terrorism as it is against there religion. This post is slightly racist but its your opion so who am i to judge x

There are about 1.6 billion muslims in the world , 20% of them are terrorists. The majority of the muslim population are average people with different beliefs. To say that ALL muslims are responsible is like saying white people are responsible for donald trump boming syria. Most of the population of muslims dont actually agree with isis or the act of terrorism as it is against there religion. This post is slightly racist but its your opion so who am i to judge x

I don't think it is fair because the ones behind the attacks aren't Muslims, they are terrorists


Posted from TSR Mobile

Only a bigot would say all Muslims are to blame for Islamic terrorist attacks, they're clearly not. But the problem with your post is that the definition of who a true Muslim is is subjective. In like manner, ISIS may accuse many Western Muslims of being apostates and will say that they themselves are the true Muslims.

But you see, the definition of a true Muslim is not subjective, it is defined by the Qur'an and Sunnah, not by the countless factions that have arisen to create strife and mislead those Muslims who are ignorant or too lazy to bother about their religion. ISIS has no right to call themselves true Muslims, because they are the absolute, disgusting opposite to Islam and its teachings. I'm sure it would be stupid if a car company like BMW started pretending they are a phone company just because their new models have communication systems. But rather the Western media chooses to report what makes money, and generates views, which is understandable from a business perspective but ethically, is that remotely right?
I would press the issue more, but my exam revision should take priority over a debate, I just felt compelled to say something to defend my religion.

But you see, the definition of a true Muslim is not subjective, it is defined by the Qur'an and Sunnah, not by the countless factions that have arisen to create strife and mislead those Muslims who are ignorant or too lazy to bother about their religion. ISIS has no right to call themselves true Muslims, because they are the absolute, disgusting opposite to Islam and its teachings. I'm sure it would be stupid if a car company like BMW started pretending they are a phone company just because their new models have communication systems. But rather the Western media chooses to report what makes money, and generates views, which is understandable from a business perspective but ethically, is that remotely right?
I would press the issue more, but my exam revision should take priority over a debate, I just felt compelled to say something to defend my religion.

Im tired of people blaming their problems on a special group of people. If its terrorists its muslim problem, if its something else its the migrants, other things it might be christians. You need to realise only sick people do this kind of stuff.

It's pretty obvious there's no one, all-encompassing definition of what a Muslim is, otherwise there wouldn't be countless number of sects. Muslims haven't been able to agree on 100% of what it means since the time of Muhammad!

However, there are a few basic things which pretty much all of them can agree on: that Allah is God, Muhammad is his last messenger and that the Quran is the unchangeable, timeless and perfect guide for humanity. ISIS believe all of these things so there are no convincing grounds whatsoever to accuse them of not being Muslim.

Most, if not all of what ISIS do can be found in the Quran and sunnah and committing heinous acts does not take you out of the fold of Islam. As far as I'm aware the only sin that constitutes apostasy is shirk.

And what are Isis doing that Mohammed didn't?

Oh come on, don't show your ignorance, you could have just not responded and kept face.
There are many things other than shirk which constitute apostasy, for example the denial of verses of the Qur'an and the denial of what Muslim scholars have come to a consensus upon, such as stating that prayer is completely unnecessary. ISIS have violated every rule there is about war in Islam, which are so strict that even the trees of an invaded land are not to be harmed. And jihaad in a military sense is not up to any pathetically uneducated and brainwashed idiot to decide upon, there needs to be a proper consensus and a cause, such as retaliation to oppression.
As I said, these countless sects of Islam were created out of spite and desire to cause mischief, and are all false except one, those whop adhere to the teachings of Qur'an and the Sunnah. I am of course speaking about sects that claim to be Muslim like the Shia or Sufi, but have altered the religion so much that it does not resemble the original but in name.
Also, I really think you need to understand this simple, fundamental concept that to ISIS, Islam is a FRONT that they are using to create strife and discord. If the world really wanted to snuff them out they would be gone. Do not even try to tell me that 'there are no convincing grounds whatsoever to accuse them of not being Muslim', because there is all the convincing ground to do so.
Please, like I said, save face and do not spout nonsense

I'll keep it short. I don't recall Mohammed terrorisng the world on a mass scale and using disgusting tactics just for fear-mongering. Let me as a question: And what research have you done on the matter?

I'll keep it short. I don't recall Mohammed terrorisng the world on a mass scale and using disgusting tactics just for fear-mongering. Let me as a question: And what research have you done on the matter?