Resolution 2007/43: Concerning Human Rights In The Middle East For Palestinians

Scroll to see replies

Apollo

What a mess this is. Tonga's rep has already made an excellent point. We give economic aid to the PA regularly aid. We are doing all we can to get both parties back the table, and we think it's about time for a Palestinian state. On the other side however, the Palestinians will need to accept what's being offered, so long as it's fair.

That said however, we will veto this unless the obvious Anti-Israeli rhetoric is completely removed. If the UAE wants to see actual progress made, they should focus on creating balenced and fair resolutions, instead of just fanning the flames of violence.

Resolution edited.(as planned earlier)

You are no where to be mentioned; still, that doesn't solve the problem, does it? Have you read any of the 71 resolutions Israel has broken? Surely this is something to be considered.

Palestine deserves to be treated, if not better, atleast as a nation and the individuals as humans.

Reply 21

A Y A Z

Nefarious

Tonga would like to point out that the biggest providers of Aid to the palestinian people are (IIRC) Germany, The USA and Israel, two of them the nations targeted to by this resolution .

[OOC]Resolution edited. The resolution was to be changed earlier, but I was waiting for a SC nation to reply first.[/OOC]

And Israel? Proof please? Even if they DID give the Palestinians aid, does it mean that their actions can be ignored so easily?

Reply 22

Catsmeat

A Y Z

The clause has not been removed. It has been put there for a reason. We will wait for the US, Iran etc. particularly the SC nations to reply, before any editing can be done.

In which case Poland urges that the clause should be removed. Greater condemnation would be neither meaningful nor constructive.

Reply 23

ukebert

Could you now take out "and hopefully take stronger action into Israel breaching the U.N resolutions and the Laws of Human Rights."?

:smile:

The rhetoric is much improved.

Reply 24

A Y A Z

ukebert

Could you now take out "and hopefully take stronger action into Israel breaching the U.N resolutions and the Laws of Human Rights."?

:smile:

The rhetoric is much improved.

Why?

It says hopefully take stronger action; its doesn't imply that stronger action needs to be taken at once etc.

If you want, I can remove the 'stronger'.

However, I don't see any need for any further editing. Israel has broken 71 resolutions. 71! Surely some action has to be taken.