Remember this is from AQA. Try to read the examiners report of the secTion of the exam youre struggling with. Sorry i keep adding some more i dont want to bother you just trying to help😂: Some students moved into Level 6 for AO2 via a thread that ran throughout their response explaining how the writer was working to present ideas rather than focusing solely on analysis of techniques, words or phrases. In An Inspector Calls, much good use was made of stage directions, lighting and structure to comment on AO2. Students who had used character development / purpose as their focus for AO2 produced some very effective responses as they were explicitly focusing on writer as maker of the text. For example, in response to Q2 on An Inspector Calls, the most able students often used the task as a vehicle by which to demonstrate their perceptive understanding of Goole’s function. There was much discussion of the tensions between capitalism and socialism, and how Goole is Priestley’s agent to re-set the social equilibrium. Students of some of the best responses to Lord of the Flies were able to synthesise their confident conceptual grasp of Golding’s ideas with a forensic analysis of how they are made manifest in the novel because of the methods that he deploys. One particularly impressive response sensitively debated whether the shattering of the conch was in fact an image of hope, reflecting Golding’s own sense of the world post-WWII, that had been shattered, but would re-emerge from the ‘fragments’ of its destruction. This was by no means untypical: many students wrote with real imagination about Golding’s symbolism and what this might mean in terms of how society reconfigures itself in the aftermath of untold horror.