As the saying goes, if there's a will, there's a way.
I would suggest on making small bullet points on the
form,
opening,
structure,
specific language, and
ending on all 16 poems.
If you've done this, in the exam you can structure your answer like this:
Para 1:
Comparative point about the
form in both texts
Poem 1 - Evidence, Technique, Explanation, Refer back to writer’s intention
Poem 2 - Evidence, Technique, Explanation, Refer back to writer’s intention
Para 2:
Comparative point about the
opening in both texts
Poem 1 - Evidence, Technique, Explanation, Refer back to writer’s intention
Poem 2 - Evidence, Technique, Explanation, Refer back to writer’s intention
Para 3:
Comparative point about the
structure in both texts
Poem 1 - Evidence, Technique, Explanation, Refer back to writer’s intention
Poem 2 - Evidence, Technique, Explanation, Refer back to writer’s intention
Para 4:
Comparative point about the
specific language in both texts
Poem 1 - Evidence, Technique, Explanation, Refer back to writer’s intention
Poem 2 - Evidence, Technique, Explanation, Refer back to writer’s intention
Para 5:
Comparative point about the
ending in both texts
Poem 1 - Evidence, Technique, Explanation, Refer back to writer’s intention
Poem 2 - Evidence, Technique, Explanation, Refer back to writer’s intention
[The pneumonic to learn for structuring the paragraphs is PETER: Point, Evidence, Technique, Explanation, Reference back to writer's intention.]
And voila, you're bullet points on all 16 poems on form, opening, structure, specific language and ending can be put to use, and you're opening yourself up to get marks for both AO2 and AO3 by analysing form, language, and structure alongside making connections between the poems.
Good luck!