Why does USA not have to answer to anybody?

We declared war on the Germans remember. We attacked them first, so theoretically by your logic they were justified attacking our cities and civilians?

Although in the worng, the Germans believed they were justified in attacking us. What about the recent war in Iraq, that was illegal, even though our Government said it was justified. If the Iraqi's had the means would they be in the right to drop A bombs on our cities until we capitulated.

True but we had a mutual assistance pact with poland so they knew war with one meant war with the other. What the germans believed doesn't matter. No we were morally in the right in attacking iraq and it was legal.

Thats completely different the jews were not a threat. They were not working to provide armies with bullets that might end up killing german soldiers. There was such a thing as a german resistance so maybe hitler should have killed all germans by your logic?

obviously the Jews weren't a threat, hence my point. It doesn't seem you realize that i was giving a stupid scenario that mimicked yours. The civilians were not a threat either. To my knowledge, the city did not have factories in it. Hence why there is always so much of a fuss about it. There was no military significance, it was simply retribution for the bombings in Britain.

Yes, we are off-topic.

If you knew about the Jewish resistance you would rethink that statement

have you ever seen the movie 'defiance'? Just remembered it.

Why is it that the USA don't have to answer to anybody for their actions

I don't quite understand, but from what I can see the UK is just America's little bitch, a complete pushover...the one who bends over for America to rape it outrageously, which is frustrating to see being British.

Why can't other countries with some balls (except N.Korea ) defy America and stop them from snooping around their internal affairs?

China could destroy the US with one phone call without so much as launching a fighter jet, and the US could do nothing about it.

China own trillions in USD, all they have to do is dump it and the US economy goes to ****.

The USA should have been tried for war crimes following the Vietnam War. It is a sad reflection on the nature of democracy within the modern world that it was not.

Do you think the deaths and birth defects caused by napalm, which amounted to genocide, was justified? It was a futile and bitter war; Vietnam succumbed to the communist regime anyway.

Mistreating trained combattants during a conflict is very different to deliberately harming civilians through the use of napalm.

If the civilians posed no immediate threat to the US armed forces, then one would consider it murder, although admittedly it is a somewhat emotive term.

Because usually the allegations of misdeeds are utterly bogus.
Hardly. The UK are our ally. We help each other because we're friends.
Because defying America typically means being a rogue nation and committing evil acts, and most countries don't like acting that way.

Hardly. The UK are our ally. We help each other because we're friends.

Oh surprise surprise, an american defending America...shocker!

Perhaps the allegations of misdeeds are utterly bogus, or it could be that dismissing them as utterly bogus is in itself utterly bogus.

No country is 'friends' with another, it's about give and take, sharing, using and providing services.

America is not the universal benchmark for all that is right, far from it actually, so defying it would not make a country a 'rogue nation committing evil acts'.

But don't stress your little delusional americanised head over it, son.

Soon Europe will arise as the worlds largest superpower!

*plays ode to joy*

HAHAHAHA!

Sorry that gave me quite a chuckle.

A passing glance at history will show the USA to be untrustworthy and unreliable as an ally.

(Nothing against Americans as people, they're pretty polite, but the idea that they absolutely love us is simply false).

I could do without Germany, but I think the UK are pretty decent people.

So I guess it was wrong of us to come bail Europe out of two world wars and then prevent the Russians from crushing Europe?

I could do without Germany, but I think the UK are pretty decent people.

You could do without Germany? Are you retarded? You are no longer in the 20th century, this forum does not tolerate the ostracizing of nationalities or races. As I said, typical americanised head of yours...you're exactly the type of american redneck hillbilly going around shouting ''We saved your ass in WW1 and WW2".

Also, the UK are not people, it's a country/unitary state. Dumbass

Without Germany your defense industry would barely exist, and your army would lack its reputation of being the most well-equipped in the world.

And what about abandoning us in Suez, attempting to drag us into Vietnam and using Britain as a shield against the Russians during the Cold War*?

*(The US installed ballistic missiles in Britain and much of Western Europe. If the US launched these missiles as Russia the retaliatory strike would be against Western Europe.)



No you couldn't. A significant amount of your military's hardware is made in Germany, or at least with German co-operation.

Without Germany your defense industry would barely exist, and your army would lack its reputation of being the most well-equipped in the world.