There doesn't appear to be much between them, to be honest, personally, I'd go with the one you felt the most at home at. If the departments finances aren't in bad shape that is good too - it means they'll have more interesting projects to fund and more motivated lecturers.
I wouldn't knock a general engineering foundation course either, whilst it may not be specialised, the foundation year should be the tool-kit on which to build. At most universities you aren't going to really specialise until year 3 and 4 anyway - the majority of the engineering courses at my university were the same for the first 2 years, some specialist modules here and there, but 90% was the same.
At this level, I wouldn't put too much kudos on statistics alone either. Sure, if you were picking from Oxford and Cambridge or the Russell group against Sussex/Plymouth I'd call you on it, but you're not, you're aiming at a level comfortable to you, and because of that, just go with the one that feels right. At the end of the day, most companies aren't fussy where the MEng came from (and if they are they probably aren't worth working for), so long as you have the certificate in the first place. Especially if that certificate says "Master of Engineering" on it.
If that doesn't help you, then do what I did, and pick the university out of a hat. If your immediate reaction is dissapointment, just go with the other one. Gives you a good anecdote for Freshers week
But good choice, I thoroughly enjoyed electronic engineering.
Stu Haynes MEng