The Student Room Group

Why Europe should thank the US

Scroll to see replies

Reply 120
Good to see Americans taking advantage of the fact that they were only involved in the war because of Roosevelt. American public opinion at the time was massively anti-war with Germany (some even sympathised with Hitler, similarly in Britain). So really we Brits can thank Roosevelt's administration and certainly not the American public for the support we had from the USA in WWII.

Regardless of any argument, the USSR can lay the most claim to have won WWII on their own. The cold war was basically a zero sum game, no one really won the USSR came out worse off than the USA naturally but the world as a whole lost.
Original post by DYKWIA
Well, we pretty much saved europe three times over the 20th century. We saved you from the germans twice, WWI and WWII and then we saved you from the USSR after WWII.


WWI? Fool are you serious? You're saying that America saved Britain (and France) during the Great War?
Never have I heard such an insult. Explain yourself now. I will write a entire fricking essay detailing why that statement is a load of crap. And from how I've pretty much destroyed everything you've said in the 'Should England join the US and leave the EU?' thread, you must know that I can and will. So either retract and apologize or explain.
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 122
Original post by Agenda Suicide
First off it is won, not one.

Secondly in WW2 America jumped in at the last minute, debateable how much influence they had, most likely would have gone the same way.

And what exactly is wrong with that?

You see communist as evil. Why? Because you have been brought up in a capitalist society.

What if you weren't? What if you were born intoa communist country, you would be adapted to the life.

Look at the world today, it's crumbling economically.

I think communism does not work, but you are making ridiculous assumptions.

As well as this, as much of a massive JFK fan I am, they sure ensured my survival of my way of life but there have been a damn good few times when they've managed to endanger it, especially in that era.

To be honest I'm just throwing stuff out there, but you seem a bit vague and one of those uneducated people who throw their hat into the ring so I'm gonna leave it here.


How did America jump in at the last minute? WW2 was 1939-45; America joined in 1941...

What is happening to the world today is not a rise of Communism; it's just a transfer of power. China are no longer communist, they're just socialist.

Every country will always act in its own interests, and the USA was very much responsible for stopping the spread of Communism, through Marshall Aid, the Korean/Vietnam wars.

They have always been there when we needed them, and I'm sure that the time will arise again in the future where we need their help, and they come riding to the rescue.
Reply 123
Original post by pol pot noodles
WWI? Fool are you serious? You're saying that America saved Britain (and France) during the Great War?
Never have I heard such an insult. Explain yourself now. I will write a entire fricking essay detailing why that statement is a load of crap. And from how I've pretty much destroyed everything you've said in the 'Should England join the US and leave the EU?' thread, you must know that I can and will. So either retract and apologize or explain.


You didn't 'destroy pretty much everything said'. You made some stupid comments about our sports etc.

About 130,000 Americans died fighting a petty war between empires. We had no moral obligations to enter the war and defend your oppressive empires and yet we did. So yes, we did save britain and France.
Original post by Komnenos
It is often said that the Soviets won WWII for the allies, and that American's are stupid for believing they played a pivotal role on the European front.

This may be a fair criticism, from a military point of view. In a political sense, though, the US did play the role of savior to Western Europe.

It was the US that ensured Western Europe would develop into prosperous, liberal, democracies by preventing Soviet influence from spreading West.

You can all whinge on about the US being evil imperialists, but the fact of the matter is that they ensured the survival of your way of life. As much as you may hate it.

Edit:
Whoops, I forgot that all the left-wing, "internationalist", self-hating, youth on here hate their own country and hate the fact that it doesn't resemble Venezuela. My bad.

Hah. The negs really blew up on this one.


I don't understand what you want from anyone? You realise the war ended in 1945? Do you want us to thank an American everytime we see one or can you not just appreciate the longevity of our system?
Reply 125
Original post by tufc

What is happening to the world today is not a rise of Communism; it's just a transfer of power. China are no longer communist, they're just socialist..






Your post would be of a far greater quality if you didn't use such puerile, simplistic and largely innaccurate definitions.
Reply 126
Original post by Blackburn_Allen
There's been no real difference. Your country stamps his foot down all over the world, dictates what can and can't be done, interferes with global affairs that have nothing to do with you and renowned for it's gun-ready approach to anything.

Sounds familiar.


Don't bother. When you make a legitimate point, he'll ignore it. Stick to low-brow squabble if you want any sort of a response.

Or just ignore this rubbish altogether - it's obviously intended to evoke a response.
Original post by DYKWIA
Can't we all admit that the US and to a lesser extent, russia and britain all played roles in stopping Nazi germany during the war?


Of course they all made a contribution and you also ignore the rebel uprisings in the Nazi occupied countries. The US' supplying of arms and men helped both Britain and the USSR and allowed for the liberation of Berlin. But to be fair, America had prolonged the war as they were supplying arms to Nazi Germany right up until 1941.
Reply 128
Original post by Cheese_Monster
Of course they all made a contribution and you also ignore the rebel uprisings in the Nazi occupied countries. The US' supplying of arms and men helped both Britain and the USSR and allowed for the liberation of Berlin. But to be fair, America had prolonged the war as they were supplying arms to Nazi Germany right up until 1941.


Tbh, Britain didn't much mind hitler until he invaded Poland. He seemed like a good idea at the time (because he wasn't communist), so I don't think you can really say the us prolonged the war.
Reply 129
Original post by Cheese_Monster
Of course they all made a contribution and you also ignore the rebel uprisings in the Nazi occupied countries. The US' supplying of arms and men helped both Britain and the USSR and allowed for the liberation of Berlin. But to be fair, America had prolonged the war as they were supplying arms to Nazi Germany right up until 1941.


This. Of course the US played a vital part in defeating Hitler and noone here would seriously want to doubt the sacrifices american soldiers made, especially because they didn't slaughter and rape their way through the german civilian population like the Russians did. But the US didn't 'save all of europe'.

So we Germans are thankful to the americans (but not to you personally OP, because you didn't do squat, so don't get any ideas) as much as we are thankful to the UK. Those 15 years were the biggest mistake my country ever made and they were an absolute disgrace for our otherwise long and great history. As to what happened afterwards, Marshall plan and so on - those were really important for us but the US profited even more from them, so we're kind of even there.

Thing is though, nowadays the USA, the UK and Germany are allies and friends so I really don't see the point of debating who put it the most effort in WW2. We all have ancestors who fought and died in the war, they gave the biggest sacrifice of all - but none of us were alive back then and instead of debating the past in an internet forum we should focus on solving todays problems - and today it seems like it's the USA that needs saving.
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 130

Original post by tufc
How did America jump in at the last minute? WW2 was 1939-45; America joined in 1941...

What is happening to the world today is not a rise of Communism; it's just a transfer of power. China are no longer communist, they're just socialist.

Every country will always act in its own interests, and the USA was very much responsible for stopping the spread of Communism, through Marshall Aid, the Korean/Vietnam wars.

They have always been there when we needed them, and I'm sure that the time will arise again in the future where we need their help, and they come riding to the rescue.


But without the help of the Soviet Union, such threads like this wouldn't exist, except maybe on Studentroom.de. Point is, we have the Soviet Union to thank for inflicting 85% of WWII German casualties - if this had not been the case, the D-Day landings could have been met with over 100 divisions, which would have utterly destroyed any chance of success.
Original post by Some random guy
You guys still haven't thanked the French for saving your ass during the war of independence.


we saved them in two world wars bro :wink:
Reply 132
Original post by JOR2010
But without the help of the Soviet Union, such threads like this wouldn't exist, except maybe on Studentroom.de. Point is, we have the Soviet Union to thank for inflicting 85% of WWII German casualties - if this had not been the case, the D-Day landings could have been met with over 100 divisions, which would have utterly destroyed any chance of success.


No doubt, but if you look at post-war history, you will realise that Stalin wanted to spread totalitarian communism, whilst the US wanted to preserve self determination in Europe.
Reply 133
Original post by Aeolus



Your post would be of a far greater quality if you didn't use such puerile, simplistic and largely innaccurate definitions.


I don't see what's so wrong about it - China is effectively run by social democrats, just without the 'democrats' part being valid - i.e. they accept the role of Capitalism, but feel that state intervention is important
Reply 134
Original post by tufc
I don't see what's so wrong about it - China is effectively run by social democrats, just without the 'democrats' part being valid - i.e. they accept the role of Capitalism, but feel that state intervention is important



'They accept the role of capitalism but feel that state intervention is important'

'China is effectively run by social democrats, without the democrats part being valid'

I would post the facepalm gif again but can't find the URL.

The chinese state utilises coercive intervention in purusual of its' own interests. How does that mean socialism at all, that could mean any authoritarian system of governance. My original point was that you are using terms like socialism and communism as buzzwords to elicit emotive responses. It is puerile. The rest of your post was spot on, China is certainly in the ascendancy. But has it ever been communist or even socialist? Only in the most simplisticly fearmongering uses of the words.
Reply 135
Original post by noisy06
Yes, they can be simply invaded, America famously threatened Pakistan that it will bomb it "back to the stone age" despite Pakistan being a nuclear power, the US wouldn't have said that if they didn't preventive measures against the Pakistani nuclear threat. They violated Pakistan's sovereignty when they landed their troops there and took out Bin Laden and they continue to violate Pakistan's air space with their drones.

I don't want to force the issue, but the reality is, Europe would not be the same again without US influence, it would be much much worse for the UK and its allies.


tell me, when was the last time there was an actual full scale war between two nuclear powers? america may keep violating pakistans sovereignty, but thats because both countries know full well that pakistan is hardly going to make a response over such a minor thing, just like how the soviets andamericans never escalated things too much in the cold war. if it came to actually flat out invading pakistan, the US know full well that there would be nuclear retaliation, no matter what they have threatened

that is why I am actually ok with nuclear weapons, they prevent any conflict between two nuclear armed countries from escalating as far as they would have in the past
Original post by tufc
How did America jump in at the last minute? WW2 was 1939-45; America joined in 1941...

What is happening to the world today is not a rise of Communism; it's just a transfer of power. China are no longer communist, they're just socialist.

Every country will always act in its own interests, and the USA was very much responsible for stopping the spread of Communism, through Marshall Aid, the Korean/Vietnam wars.

They have always been there when we needed them, and I'm sure that the time will arise again in the future where we need their help, and they come riding to the rescue.


If you now the first thing about the war I'm sure you'll agree that America were there in the last minute. Don't be so ridiculous. The war started in 1939 did anybody do anything other than watch treaties fly round and Germany march all over weaker powers for a few years?

What's this got to do with China or anything much like that? I never mentioned any of that.

I never denied America tried to stop it but they didn't have this supreme effect everybody whose never visited the political science section of a library thinks.

Why do people who know little attack my posts or just go on about something I didn't even mention? What is with this thread?
Original post by DYKWIA
I don't remember people being insensitive about the earthquake in Japan. In fact, we gave a lot of aid to Japan after the tsunami. Even if people were insensitive, does that make it acceptable to be insensitive about the attack on Pearl Harbor?



We didn't enter the war to profiteer. We lost over 400,000 American troops during the war, defending you and the allies in the pacific.

Also, it's spelled 'Pearl Harbor' - I know you are english, but it is a place name.


Who said you entered the war to profiteer? I said, before you entered the war, you were profiteering from arming both sides, as you had done in World War 1 and the Iran-Iraq war.
Reply 138
Original post by DYKWIA
It's the truth. Communism doesn't work. I don't see how that is mocking the mass culls out there.



It is an oil state. Its GDP is nothing to do with social policies. I'd say it is a state that is successful, despite its socialist policies.


Apart from the fact that the only oil rich country in Scandinavia (which isn't a state, once again proving your stupidity) is Norway. Please explain the wealth of Sweden and Denmark.
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 139
Original post by Lewis :D
Apart from the fact that the only oil rich country in Scandinavia (which isn't a state, once again proving your stupidity) is Norway. Please explain the wealth of Sweden and Denmark.


Geography isn't my strong suit. They are rich because they stayed out of WWII and were able to keep all their industries intact and were able to act as the producers for Europe.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending