The Student Room Group

Foreigner French minister says Britain prepared for Syrian war 2 years before crisis



Let me guess he's not credible?
Reply 1
He also talks about the real motive behind all of this. Israel.

They want Assad out because of some of his anti-Israel sentiments and ties with Iran. So the country is destroyed for the benefit of Israel. The millions of refugees go to Europe which is what they want to destroy European descent people while they have Israel for the Jews. Israel if you aren't ware has incredibly strict immigration that is pretty much be Jewish or gtfo. It is also incredibly segregated. But in the West, the biggest pushers of us taking in these refugees comes from the Jews.

They love their double standards. Look at Blair's government, it was people like Jack Straw and Lord Levey who pushes for mass immigration!

We've got a lot of traitors in our governments who must be taken out.
(edited 8 years ago)
Reply 2
Original post by FuAIl
He also talks about the real motive behind all of this. Israel.

They want Assad out because of some of his anti-Israel sentiments and ties with Iran. So the country is destroyed for the benefit of Israel. The millions of refugees go to Europe which is what they want to destroy European descent people while they have Israel for the Jews. Israel if you aren't ware has incredibly strict immigration that is pretty much be Jewish or gtfo. It is also incredibly segregated. But in the West, the biggest pushers of us taking in these refugees comes from the Jews.

Roland Dumas is a disgusting anti-Semite with history on that front.

Why would Israel want an unstable paradise for Jihadists on their border? It's a case of better the devil you know for Israel.

As for Israel's immigration policies, I agree there are some disturbing sentiments made by prominent Israeli politicians re: immigration to preserve the 'Jewish' state, but 20% of Israel's population is Arab.
Reply 3
Somewhere, in a very well locked basement in Whitehall, there'll be the plans for a British invasion of France.

Just because that plan exists doesn't mean it's actually going to happen.
Original post by Drewski
Somewhere, in a very well locked basement in Whitehall, there'll be the plans for a British invasion of France.

Just because that plan exists doesn't mean it's actually going to happen.


You've been in the military, seriously do they plan for such contingency? like in a scenario of US invasion, ISIS invasion, alien invasion?
Original post by HucktheForde
You've been in the military, seriously do they plan for such contingency? like in a scenario of US invasion, ISIS invasion, alien invasion?


Actually, in the 1930s both the UK and US had plans contemplating war against one another. There's a very interesting documentary talking about what a war would be like between the US and UK in the 1930s; the US would invade Canada and Canadian troops would try to hold them down in a delaying action until an imperial relief army from the UK and various dominions could be landed.

The Royal Navy would blockade US ports and probably defeat the US Navy in a decisive sea battle. If I recall correctly they concluded the UK would win such a war.

The documentary is really interesting, here it is.

[video="youtube;kS2AlIJ621c"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS2AlIJ621c[/video]
Reply 6
What every country wants is massive instability on its borders. Every one knows this. what sort of lunatic nation would want its neighbors to be peaceful and stable. You sheeple know nothing!

:facepalm2:
Reply 7
Original post by HucktheForde
You've been in the military, seriously do they plan for such contingency? like in a scenario of US invasion, ISIS invasion, alien invasion?


There's even a part of the UN dedicated to such things.
Original post by Drewski
There's even a part of the UN dedicated to such things.


I read about that a couple of years ago. I always felt that if we did make alien contact, that's when the UN would really come into its own and probably accrue some real power. That does seem like the best way to proceed; for all its uselessness and corruption, the UN does have some very dedicated, smart people working for it.

I did read a fascinating document the NSA released through FOIA, one of their cryptographers wrote a position paper on alien contact in the 1960s.

https://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/ufo/ufo_hypothesis.pdf

I thought this bit was quite interesting, basically whether the aliens want to conquer us or not, we're probably screwed.

A. If "they" discover you, it is an old but hardly invalid rule of thumb, "they" are your technological superiors. Human history has shown us time and again the tragic results of a confrontation between a technologically superior civilisation and a technologically inferior people. The "inferior" is usually subject to physical conquest.

B. Often in the past a technologically superior people are also possessors of a more virile and aggressive culture. In a confrontation between two peoples of significantly different cultural levels, those having the inferior or less virile culture, most often suffer a tragic loss of identity and are usually absorbed by the other people.


So basically, we would end up like the American Indians or Australian aborigines. The document does outline some interesting historical examples of a technologically inferior people closing the gap (he cites the historical example of the Japanese; in the 19th century they were quite far behind Europe. By 1905 they were strong enough to defeat Russia in a war).

c. Some peoples who were technologically and/or culturally inferior to other nations have survived--have maintained their identity--have equalized the differences between them and their adversaries. The Japanese people have given us an excellent example of the methods required to achieve such survival:

(1) full and honest acceptance of the nature of the inferiorities separating you from the advantages of the other peoples,

(2) complete national solidarity in all positions taken in dealing with the other culture,

(3) highly controlled and limited intercourse with the other side--doing only those things advantageous to the foreigner which you are absolutely forced to do by the circumstances,

(4) a correct but friendly attitude toward the other people,

(5) a national eagerness to learn everything possible about the other citizens--its technological and cultural strengths and weaknesses. This often involves sending selected groups and individuals to the other's country to become one of his kind, or even to help him in his wars against other adversaries,

(6) Adopting as many of the advantages of the opposing people as you can, and doing it as fast as possible--while still protecting your own identity by molding each new knowledge increment into your own cultural cast.


Pretty interesting stuff.
Reply 9
Why would he lie? even Wesley Clark talked about the war plan though I have no idea why he would reveal such thing.. guilt?

So can we at least agree that these regime changes has a lot to do with Israel? the media often bring up Saudi Arabia, Turkey but never Israel...

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending