!!! i'm so pleased that i'm not the only person who thinks she ought to have stopped with 'noughts and crosses'!!!
i've read both the sequels and, although there's nothing much wrong with them, i don't think that they were necessary. although 'knife edge' and 'checkmate' carry on the story, all they really do is take the events of the first book to their logical conclusion. i finished reading the third book and although it didn't leave me dissatisfied, i didn't feel that it had been worth my while reading it. 'noughts and crosses' is powerful, thought-provoking and relevant - it's exactly the kind of book that i think young people ought to be reading, because they are the people who are going to grow up in an increasingly multicultural society, and they are the ones who need to be inspired to make that society one which is tolerant of cultural differences, race and religion. i feel that the final chapter of 'noughts and crosses' is so potent simply because it leaves the conflict unresolved, almost inviting a reader to consider his or her own reactions and opinions. for me, the two sequels somehow lessen the inspirational power of the first novel. so if anyone on here hasn't already read them then i'd advise them not to.
ahem, sorry about the mini-essay. i've been wanting to say that since i finished the third book, and i haven't yet found a suitable customer to pounce on.