hey all i wasnt sure what to call this thread because no one seems to have heard of it before basically i have messy handwriting. its something i work on but i just cant get it any neater. Im allowed to word process some of my exams- but not all. Apparently i get something called a 'transcript' where my teachers read through my exam papers and check everything is readable before sending it to be marked?! has anyone ever heard of this before or has this themselves? thanks
My friend had the same thing, but he was allowed to use a word processor for all his exams. Others please correct me if i am wrong, but isnt a transcript a copy of the exam paper?
My friend had the same thing, but he was allowed to use a word processor for all his exams. Others please correct me if i am wrong, but isnt a transcript a copy of the exam paper?
thats what i thought a transcript was, though when i asked in the additional support department they said my teachers would read them
A 'transcript' in general terms is simply a copy of a piece of writing or audio recording - usually a translation of something illegible into something legible.
I have no idea what it is in terms of exam boards, but I would imagine from that definition that your teacher is allowed to write out a neater copy if yours is illegible.
hey all i wasnt sure what to call this thread because no one seems to have heard of it before basically i have messy handwriting. its something i work on but i just cant get it any neater. Im allowed to word process some of my exams- but not all. Apparently i get something called a 'transcript' where my teachers read through my exam papers and check everything is readable before sending it to be marked?! has anyone ever heard of this before or has this themselves? thanks
I can't understand why you are allowed to use a word processor in some exams but not all, it seems most odd. The only reason I can think is that it is for exams with short answers and they expect your work to be legible but will just give it a quick check.
For a transcript, someone who is familiar with your handwriting, but does not teach you for that exam, attempts to make sense of what you wrote. You are not allowed to be involved in this process. Depending on how hard it is to read, they can either photocopy your script and write their take on occasional hard to read words above the word, or re-write the whole thing out again. The examiner will attempt to read your script but will refer to the transcript if they get stuck. (If you get your marked script back you might find annotations similar to '2 marks from transcript').
Making a transcript is an incredibly laborious process to do properly for essay subjects - I estimate that to produce a good transcript of a bad script takes about 3 times as many man hours as the exam took and you still land up with the odd indecipherable word. To do it properly takes 2 people, one to give it their best shot and then someone else to bounce ideas off for the tricky bits. Ideally, the person doing the transcript also needs a decent knowledge of the subject they're transcribing or it is even harder to identify the words and if , for instance, they don't know that alkanes and alkenes are different things then it is easy to make a mistake in transcription.
I can't understand why you are allowed to use a word processor in some exams but not all, it seems most odd. The only reason I can think is that it is for exams with short answers and they expect your work to be legible but will just give it a quick check.
For a transcript, someone who is familiar with your handwriting, but does not teach you for that exam, attempts to make sense of what you wrote. You are not allowed to be involved in this process. Depending on how hard it is to read, they can either photocopy your script and write their take on occasional hard to read words above the word, or re-write the whole thing out again. The examiner will attempt to read your script but will refer to the transcript if they get stuck. (If you get your marked script back you might find annotations similar to '2 marks from transcript').
Making a transcript is an incredibly laborious process to do properly for essay subjects - I estimate that to produce a good transcript of a bad script takes about 3 times as many man hours as the exam took and you still land up with the odd indecipherable word. To do it properly takes 2 people, one to give it their best shot and then someone else to bounce ideas off for the tricky bits. Ideally, the person doing the transcript also needs a decent knowledge of the subject they're transcribing or it is even harder to identify the words and if , for instance, they don't know that alkanes and alkenes are different things then it is easy to make a mistake in transcription.
I hate transcripts.
thanks for the info im a bit worried to be honest, especially as you said it takes an examiner so much longer to mark my exam....i should have been allowed to use word proccessor for all my exams, but the support department was adament it wasnt needed im going to try and sort it out for A2