The Student Room Group

Durham University Have Asked me to Re-Apply for a Different Course

Hello guys.

This application cycle I applied for International Relations at Durham University. My predicted grades were A*A*A*, and in the 3 subjects I'm doing at A2 Level, I averaged 97.5% in my AS grades. Yet they rejected me for that course.

Anyway, a week later, they have Emailed me asking me to re-apply to one of the courses on their 'referral courses' list- seemingly undersubscribed courses, such as Sociology, Criminology and a myriad of combined honours with Education Studies courses. My question is, is this just a standard, arrogant Durham practice? Or have I been selected because my application was judged to be good, but not good enough for that course, but nonetheless good enough for one of these courses?

What I'm asking is basically, do all Durham rejectees get this opportunity or is it selective.

Thanks
(edited 9 years ago)
Sorry you've not had any responses about this. :frown: Are you sure you’ve posted in the right place? Posting in the specific Study Help forum should help get more responses. :redface: Hopefully someone will be able to get back to you :h:
Original post by Alex347_
Hello guys.

This application cycle I applied for International Relations at Durham University. My predicted grades were A*A*A*, and in the 3 subjects I'm doing at A2 Level, I averaged 97.5% in my AS grades. Yet they rejected me for that course.

Anyway, a week later, they have Emailed me asking me to re-apply to one of the courses on their 'referral courses' list- seemingly undersubscribed courses, such as Sociology, Criminology and a myriad of combined honours with Education Studies courses. My question is, is this just a standard, arrogant Durham practice? Or have I been selected because my application was judged to be good, but not good enough for that course, but nonetheless good enough for one of these courses?

What I'm asking is basically, do all Durham rejectees get this opportunity or is it selective.

Thanks


I dont know but tto be honest that seems pretty weird given your AS grades. What subjects are you doing at the moment??
I would email them. There might have been a mistake.. :smile:
Original post by Alex347_
Hello guys.

This application cycle I applied for International Relations at Durham University. My predicted grades were A*A*A*, and in the 3 subjects I'm doing at A2 Level, I averaged 97.5% in my AS grades. Yet they rejected me for that course.

Anyway, a week later, they have Emailed me asking me to re-apply to one of the courses on their 'referral courses' list- seemingly undersubscribed courses, such as Sociology, Criminology and a myriad of combined honours with Education Studies courses. My question is, is this just a standard, arrogant Durham practice? Or have I been selected because my application was judged to be good, but not good enough for that course, but nonetheless good enough for one of these courses?

What I'm asking is basically, do all Durham rejectees get this opportunity or is it selective.

Thanks



Lots of members in the applications and UCAS forum with Durham experience who will be able to support you.
Original post by Alex347_
Hello guys.

This application cycle I applied for International Relations at Durham University. My predicted grades were A*A*A*, and in the 3 subjects I'm doing at A2 Level, I averaged 97.5% in my AS grades. Yet they rejected me for that course.

Anyway, a week later, they have Emailed me asking me to re-apply to one of the courses on their 'referral courses' list- seemingly undersubscribed courses, such as Sociology, Criminology and a myriad of combined honours with Education Studies courses. My question is, is this just a standard, arrogant Durham practice? Or have I been selected because my application was judged to be good, but not good enough for that course, but nonetheless good enough for one of these courses?

What I'm asking is basically, do all Durham rejectees get this opportunity or is it selective.

Thanks


Another example halfway down this thread:

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2946133&p=53674655
Original post by ageshallnot

this seems to be quite common amongst universities. Bristol turned down someone for medicine but offered other biomedical courses. my view is if a uni does not want you for a subject why should you assist them fill their other places. you are probably holding places for other good unis. go to one of them and do a course YOU want to study for. Unfortunately courses like English and History at the likes of Durham and Exeter are oversubscribed and getting in is very much a lottery as OP has found out. The difference between Durham and your other chosen uni is likely to be very small and Durham's loss will be someone else's gain. perhaps the lesson is that applicants need to have a range of options and not put all their choices in top unis.
Original post by swanseajack1
this seems to be quite common amongst universities. Bristol turned down someone for medicine but offered other biomedical courses. my view is if a uni does not want you for a subject why should you assist them fill their other places. you are probably holding places for other good unis. go to one of them and do a course YOU want to study for. Unfortunately courses like English and History at the likes of Durham and Exeter are oversubscribed and getting in is very much a lottery as OP has found out. The difference between Durham and your other chosen uni is likely to be very small and Durham's loss will be someone else's gain. perhaps the lesson is that applicants need to have a range of options and not put all their choices in top unis.


Well said. This is particularly the case when the offered course is barely related to the original application. Durham appear to have a very lofty view of their own appeal if they expect International Relations applicants to switch to Sociology or Criminology simply for Durham's reputation. It smacks of the same disdain with which they treated people in Clearing in the past.
Original post by swanseajack1
this seems to be quite common amongst universities. Bristol turned down someone for medicine but offered other biomedical courses. my view is if a uni does not want you for a subject why should you assist them fill their other places. you are probably holding places for other good unis. go to one of them and do a course YOU want to study for.

To be fair in the Bristol example that's quite handy - if someone applies for 4 medicine options and gets 4 rejections then they're relying on their 5th choice being a good one (or the gap year option). With an alternate course offer instead of a rejection then that gives applicants who don't get a med place at least a choice or chance to have an insurance...and even if they do get a med offer it means that they have some options for an insurance choice.

For subjects where applicants have 5 choices and can chose to apply to courses with a range of entry requirements then the chances of ending up with only 1 offer are fairly low so in that case it does come across as desperation on the part of the university (rather than flexibility that could benefit the applicant as much as the student). Especially in the OPs case and in the case of the other Durham applicant linked to.

My guess is that following all the terrible treatment of applicants during results weeks over the last few years Durham have had a bit of a sparse year.
Original post by ageshallnot
Well said. This is particularly the case when the offered course is barely related to the original application. Durham appear to have a very lofty view of their own appeal if they expect International Relations applicants to switch to Sociology or Criminology simply for Durham's reputation. It smacks of the same disdain with which they treated people in Clearing in the past.


When I applied to Durham in 199*cough* I received a long lecture in my subject interview about how applicants should chose their university first and *then* the subject (because it was clear from my application that I'd applied to 6 universities offering a specific specialised course).

Doesn't look like the culture has changed much in the last 20 years or so :nope:

I did enjoy telling them where to stick their (BCC) offer :biggrin:
Original post by PQ
When I applied to Durham in 199*cough* I received a long lecture in my subject interview about how applicants should chose their university first and *then* the subject (because it was clear from my application that I'd applied to 6 universities offering a specific specialised course).

Doesn't look like the culture has changed much in the last 20 years or so :nope:

I did enjoy telling them where to stick their (BCC) offer :biggrin:


I chose my unis (back in 197* apoplectic cough!) specifically for the modules offered in History, and on that basis I ignored Durham. (York's CCC won me over!)
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by PQ
When I applied to Durham in 199*cough* I received a long lecture in my subject interview about how applicants should chose their university first and *then* the subject (because it was clear from my application that I'd applied to 6 universities offering a specific specialised course).

Doesn't look like the culture has changed much in the last 20 years or so :nope:

I did enjoy telling them where to stick their (BCC) offer :biggrin:


The Oxford application form in the 1980s invited applicants to select a second alternative course.

Of course the big difference in the Carboniferous epoch was no personal statement.


Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending