Would you support laws against people denouncing Islam?

Democracy is open to manipulation on a massive scale.

So you don't know what you want?

I'm having a difficult time trying to pin you down. You say that you know what you want and when I ask, how will you know you have it, you say "through trial and error" etc.

You either know what you want or you don't know what you want. Which one is it?

So, how the person got into power is more important to you than the actual substance that they derive from their powers.

You could have a benevolent dictatorship and a corrupt democracy, yet you'll still pick the corrupt democracy?

Whereas Islam is not being corrupted by ISIS?

I cant quote but..
The fine line between criticism and negative speech is subjective

Yes religion is a choice but even so, why should we disrespect each others choices? Just because I grew up deciding to believe in Santa, that doesn't mean i should have been bombarded with insults about Santa. (Just an example, i acc never believed in santa lmao)

Many muslims would agree that their religion is sacred. Whilst many people would agree that a jacket is not sacred. Don't try to falsely equivocate the two.

You know what you want - So you tweak the system to get what you want, but a year later, you tweak the system again, and again, and again.

Do you know what you want? I think not...


I was making the point that sometimes, dogmatic adherence to the method (i.e: democracy) may not always present the vision of what you want.

Whereas a benevolent dictatorship may but you'd refuse it simply because it didn't come about in the "accepted manner"...

No. And anyone intending to implement them should be hounded out of the country

As long as it has some kind of codified belief system and some kind of hierarchy in place to take reference from.
.

What is up with you? Why do you have this constant need to deflect simply because you wish to not accept or at the very least, mitigate the flaws inherent in your desired system.

There is no reason to make laws as such. Yes everyone is entitles to "freedom of Speech" but isn't there a certain line that you shouldn't cross. Im not going to ignore that they are certain individuals from every religion/ faith that are hysteric about their personal view upon their religion but not the entire population of that religion/ faith act the same as them.
As for the comic artists at Hebdo and other comic artists in general, their job is to create comic strips more often than usual with humour. However, how can they not expect that people would not feel hurt upon their drawings or people would not react. Now i'm not stating that thee way that they reacted was appropriate, of course not, peoples lives were lost but when you ignite a fire you can't expect that you won't receive a burn.