The Cambridge Maths Thread
For all questions and discussion about every aspect of Cambridge courses.
-
Re: Maths at Cambridge - questionsCertainly not the case in my day. Possibly more so now.(Original post by Zhen Lin)
Hmm, I am inclined to disagree, especially if you are talking about the set of people who do eventually receive a STEP offer. For one thing, AEA assumes only knowledge of C1-C4, which most mathematicians-to-be would have completed in lower 6th or earlier, no?
But you have done well at interview, and to be honest, I'd be very surprised if you don't get SS in STEP at the end of this year, so you're not actually a counterexample to what I'm saying.Furthermore only 70% is needed to get a distinction - and overall I thought the paper was quite doable. I even finished my real one (June 2007) with about 15-20 minutes to spare, after panicking a bit over a question. (I believe it involved geometry - blah.)
I think having to answer every question makes a big difference. In contrast, there's a lot of choice in STEP: you can get full marks without attempting a single pure question, after all.I also agree that it's not quite the same style as STEP, but essentially the same skills are required, no? Perseverance, not panicking, and being able to take hints. -
Re: Maths at Cambridge - questionsI agree with DFranklin here, I found AEA more challenging than STEP I when I took both, I managed a merit in AEA and a 1 in STEP, due to answering 2 mechanics questions on STEP and 2 pure, whereas a panicked and messed up questions on the AEA.(Original post by DFranklin)
Certainly not the case in my day. Possibly more so now.
But you have done well at interview, and to be honest, I'd be very surprised if you don't get SS in STEP at the end of this year, so you're not actually a counterexample to what I'm saying.
I think having to answer every question makes a big difference. In contrast, there's a lot of choice in STEP: you can get full marks without attempting a single pure question, after all. -
Re: Mathematics at Cambridgeonly for computer science(Original post by Chewwy)
what!? do you have ANY idea how the cambridge tripos system works??
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/admissions/u...uirements.html -
Re: Mathematics at CambridgeWhich the OP wasn't asking about???(Original post by trance addict)
only for computer science
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/admissions/u...uirements.html
I don't think a Physics to A-level is essential for Maths, though a lot of the colleges say it's useful for you to do it - but you won't need to be part of the NatSci tripos or anything - see this page.
(but correct me if I'm wrong everyone)Last edited by *Liana*; 27-04-2008 at 23:42. -
Re: Mathematics at Cambridge
Basically the minimum requirement is A-Level Maths and AS Further Maths; but they wouldn't be impressed if you didn't take A-Level Further Maths if your school provided it.
Regarding the science; most colleges say that Physics is very useful; but I know plenty of people here without it. -
Re: Mathematics at CambridgeI was thinking the same thing. I'm not sure what that comment was even getting at, but it certainly has nothing to do with taking a maths degree.(Original post by Chewwy)
what!? do you have ANY idea how the cambridge tripos system works??
Anyway, most mathematicians do take A level physics, but it's not necessary. As far as A levels go it's a strong one to support your application and after maths it's the one which is closest to most of the maths you'll do, but as far as it actually helping you with the course material is concerned, any benefit a student with A level physics gains over one without is negligible.
Of course this is slightly different if you apply for Maths with Physics, and it would be odd to apply for this with a physics A level, but then that's fairly similar to straight maths course and the skills used will be those more tied to pre-degree maths than pre-degree physics anyway.