Can you honestly say you are liked by the large percentage of the forum. This is not a personal attack on my part, its simply what I see. Take the other day for example, you started complaining about a thread, the one in which TK and I challenged you as to why you hadn't spoken out about other "spam" threads. Do you rememebr the verbal onslaught which followed from members such as 411?
im saying i dont hold any reservations that would effect my opinion of decisions taken on the forum. i certainly dont hold anymore or stronger reservations than any other member.
Can you honestly say you are liked by the large percentage of the forum.
i can honestly say i am not disliked by the majority.
the one in which TK and I challenged you as to why you hadn't spoken out about other "spam" threads. Do you rememebr the verbal onslaught which followed from members such as 411?
members such as '411?' and TK..i think that speaks volumes. a vocal minority that hardly distinguishes me from any other member on Moncal's list or indeed any of the current moderators. i also replied to that question sensibly and honestly, reiterating my point above.
im saying i dont hold any reservations that would effect my opinion of decisions taken on the forum. i certainly dont hold anymore or stronger reservations than any other member.
Your views on members who frequent GC:
vienna95
members such as '411?' and TK
...and are widely known.
vienna95
i can honestly say i am not disliked by the majority.
It's arguable.
vienna95
members such as '411?' and TK..i think that speaks volumes.
Both respected and well liked members in their own right.
vienna95
a vocal minority that hardly distinguishes me from any other member
They generally seemed to have the backing of the GC losers.
vienna95
on Moncal's list or indeed any of the current moderators.
Both irrelevant.
vienna95
i also replied to that question sensibly and honestly, reiterating my point above.
Agreed. But this is not a marker of yuor popularity.
The opposition to her views, in GC, would suggest differently.
why? when was this? and anyway, a lot of newbies may come on GC and just disagree with her.....i get the impression that older and respected members don't really have a negative feeling towards her
and anyway, a lot of newbies may come on GC and just disagree with her.....i get the impression that older and respected members don't really have a negative feeling towards her
Yes, agreed, its mostly the newbie, but they are equally a part of this forum.
Vienna has also stated on more than one occassion that she would not want mod status unless there were no other suitable candidates
In other word, she does want to be a mod, but is going to play the game as though she doesn't want to. Then if appointed, she will have a some-what martyr status, no?
That depends on your intepretation of 'destroy'. If you mean would I prefer to see the number of threads about sex, or other inappropriate topics for a student forum, disappear then yes. Would I want all the threads that I deem pointless to disappear? No. In light of your comments on the Subscriber forum, you are hardly an advocate of the current content in the GC forum.
Who are you to say what's inappropriate in a student forum? If students are bringing it up and want to talk about it then it's relevant. If others don't see it as relevant they won't respond. I hope if you become a mod you wouldn't censor anyone. I'm afraid to have you as a mod, you're too much of a police officer. I can see you in grade school tattling on everyone.