you know what? Whilst I can appreciate the acheivement of these books and their brilliance - I found them such hard reading. Painful, in some respects.
you know what? Whilst I can appreciate the acheivement of these books and their brilliance - I found them such hard reading. Painful, in some respects.
Lol, just to nit-pick, technically Lord of The Rings is one book, but there you go.
To be fair, nearly all the "greats" and those that belong to the "Canon" I find to be terribly hard to read. Books by Conrad, Shelley, Stoker, Dickens, etc. all of them are exceptionally hard reads.
Don't even get me started on Laxness, whether in Icelandic or English, cause he's just a nightmare, really.
Yes and there's an English translation. He asked for English novels, ie novels written in English. If OP wanted novels of English origin I'm sure he would of said so.
Also after a bit more thought OP might want to consider something by shakespeare as its a non-controversial choice and the examiner is more likely to be familiar with it.
Yes and there's an English translation. He asked for English novels, ie novels written in English. If OP wanted novels of English origin I'm sure he would of said so.
Also after a bit more thought OP might want to consider something by shakespeare as its a non-controversial choice and the examiner is more likely to be familiar with it.
Well since he said that he'd been reading mostly Russian and French authors recently, I think we can conclude that he's after something by somebody who isn't Russian at the very least.
Jane Eyre (Charlotte Bronte) - feminist novel with Gothic hints, spiritual connotations all in a great Romantic love story that is anything but stereotypical.
Rebecca (Daphne DuMaurier) Read this years ago, compelling read, a more modern version of the Romantic novel but with a very exciting plot.
Ulysses (James Joyce) Very stylish prose and talented, mature writing.
Pride and Prejucide if you fancy a real classic
On a more modern note, Dan Brown (American I know) is absolutely unforgettable.
I did The Handmaid's Tale and 1984, really good if you want something easy to compare (and from a history nerds perspective )
I don't do lit, but I did just read 1984 (I'm do History and Politics so I'm interested in that kind of thing) for fun and I was incredibily let down. I suppose it was because I like books with thick plots whereas 1984 didn't really have a plot, I found it very boring and it took like a week for me to finish the thing as I didn't have any motivation to read it. I did however find it interesting and intruiging in terms of the points he was making which was obviously the point of the book (the excert from Goldstein's book went on for 5-10 pages and was just an excuse to literally ignore all plot and make points lol.)