From failed Nandos competitor (Bari), to some sort of badly drawn fez perhaps (eastbourne borough) there are some terrible badges out there, but which is the worst one? For me it has to be the aforementioned Fez thing:
Looks like something from a primary school art class...
I know you're trolling but someone on here will probably believe you so... we were the first club to have that on our crest and it goes way back to the 1800's.
They pinched it off us if anything (which they didn't, but we were first), and the idea for it came from Salford City Reds as their nickname is The Red Devils.
Have to admit I hate the new badge for a number of reasons. 1)Blue is in it for the first time...2)Looks soulless and corporate 3)Cannon facing the wrong way.
Think there's only two options for an A.F.C badge
1)A version of the Art-Deco classic, gives a flavour of Highbury.
2) Simply a cannon. Very understated, very classy. Very Arsenal
---
Alternatively if we're feeling a bit egotistical then just throw a gold version on the shirts to go with our solid gold invincibles EPL trophy innit.
That first one you posted looks **** imo. I've never liked the letters overlapping each other (Rangers, Real Madrid, Blues even had it one year).
Considering some of the new ones coming out now (your cartoon corporate one, Man U's minus the 'football club', Everton's current monstrosity and Man City's with the infamous three stars that commemorate no actual achievement*) we could do a lot worse than our current one. Still has 'FC' on it and is just an updated version of an old (1923) crest anyway.
*Seriously. They were included to give the crest a more 'continental' feel.