Yes what Wagners said. I know I am a bit extreme, but I happen to know there is a lot being spent on these schemes visitng schools, inviting them free for doing residential courses, and paying current students to talk to them / show them round, whilst budgets for teaching have been cut a lot.
What do you mean by 'failed etonians'? As I said before, I misinterpret because you have been ambiguous. I have tried making extrapolations but which unfortunately culminated in innocent misinterpretations whose semantics differ from your intended semantics and perhaps the epistemological truths you wished to convey.
http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?p=20457079#post20457079This too. I don't know why I put up with the retard. He has been putting words into my mouth that I said nurse practitioners shouldn't 'do' ECGs. I merely meant you need someone with a very good experience to do both carrying out the procedure and the interpretation. Whilst what he meant was 'doing' the ECG, as in carrying out the procedure. For both scenarios however, it wasn't biased towards nurse assistants per se, it goes for medical students and junior doctors. It is the knowledge and experience that counts. I've been constantly replying but he doesn't seem to understand. A lot of people disagree with what I have to say, but he doesn't seem to be making any good arguments (perhaps the reason because his English is extremely poor even for a forum). I don't mind txt-speak
per sebut the ambiguities in his sentences causes severe epistemological problems in the interpretation of the intended semantics.
No it is your English that is the problem. When you have two independent, officious bystander who both say the same thing, it adds further strength as to the claim that your English is extremely difficult to understand. So it was not just me who couldn't understand you.
Wholeheartedly agree.