Could i do the IB with these PREDICTED grades?

ENGLISH LANG - A
ENGL LIT - A
SCIENCE -A
ADDITIONAL SCIENCE - A
MATHS - B --< highly doubt this probably get a C
HISTORY -B
GEOGRAPHY -B
R.E-B
PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION (DOIN HALF AN AS ATM) - C
FOOD TECH - B

AND IF I COULD.. which subjects would you suggest i take and also which ones at higher / standard

your predicted gcse's are crap. aim for some A*s and then we can talk

It all really depends what you subject you LOVE and also what you want to BE when you grow up. Here is a sort of a layout of what you could do at IB according to ur predicted grades:

HL English
HL Chemistry (or physics)
HL Biology (or physics)

SL History/Geography
SL Language <-- french, spanish, chinese whatever!
SL Math Studies

But I could be entirely wrong here! Just chose subjects you like and you can do well in That's what is most important.

well then they're probably satisfied with lower grades then, especially if they got mostly Cs -what levels are these people expecting? I've heard of people who get most A*s in science/maths/humanities, and As in subjects they are weaker -like languages, and so even tho they get level 7/6s in most subjects, the get lower grades at their weaker subject so end up with lower overall point scores, so theyd get the equivalent of ABB whereas if they took A levels theyd b looking at AAA (or better)

id maybe change SL history/geography for HL english, coz HL english is tough, more than history and definitely more than geography.

OP, if you like geography, take it. it is supposed to be a good subject to get good score in. also, dont do physics. given your weakness in maths, HL physics will be too hard (not that it uses as much maths as at uni, but it is a significant amount and i doubt anyone not comfortable with maths can do well in it).

Clearly this guy has potential in english and should not waste it. The difference between HL and SL is four more texts and one world lit essay. PLUS you get more time in the exam than the SL. My teacher said there is very little difference...its just more work.

Actually thats not true. People who do bad in gcse's are mainly those who are lazy and don't study. Then they realize that they are given a new chance in IB and they work hard for it. There was a girl in our year that got mostly C's and a few D's but still managed to pass her GCSEs and doing IB now. She got 45 marks...got into Harvard. She was on the newspaper, she was amazing I think that IB is not HARD as in the contents is hard. It's hard in the fact that you have to do a LOT of work <-- thats hard. It's a really tough course.

really? that sounds amazing, she must've worked REALLY REALLY hard....you can't just get C's and D's at GCSE and then expect to get really good IB grades in my opinion

...snip...

Ingenuity - The ability to solve difficult problems, often in original and creative ways (Wiktionary)

Can't "put in" ingenuity

i suppose so, seeing how GCSEs are more about how well you've been taught as opposed to natural "ingenuity"