Film Fanatics Society - Chat Thread

Tootsie. I'd recognise Dustin Hoffman anywhere.

If that's what you were saying, then I'd agree with you, although I'm not really sure how you can rate a lack of something. With Kill Bill, I can see how since it's what makes the film work, though with the other examples, such as Dogville, the lack of special effects doesn't make or break the film. It's just irrelevant.

Also, @Ramalot: correct regarding still. You're up

EDIT: Also, I agree with Reems, too. If someone is reading a review before a film, that person isn't looking for anything too deeply intersected, so enjoyability of the review is indispensable. If they are reading it afterwards, they're looking either for someone to agree with them and feel justification for their opinion or looking for someone to disagree with them to discuss the merits of their views, both of which aren't something a reviewer can strive to achieve since he doesn't know all his readers.

See for more information: Mark Kermode reviewing SATC2.

I know, it's a marvellous thing you're doing. I'm dead impressed.

I'll like whoever gets this.

The quality isn't great, but it looks like De Niro in Taxi Driver.

Nope, it's much later.

Hero. Dustin Hoffman.

Yes Seen it?

I have, indeed. It was a good movie. Hoffman is a great actor tbh

My turn

Easy.

Ghostbusters.