The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1780
Original post by grazie
I think you're making the assumption that the variable x has some kind of direct mapping to t. It may do, but in this case it doesn't. Just because the lower limit for the t integral is less than the upper, it doesn't mean that the same will apply for the x integral. What you've done is fine...it just makes sense. Trying to force 2 < x < 0, makes no sense.



Original post by exe
it is 2<x<0 unless u times the cartesian eqn by -1





Original post by Beresford George
x = 2(1 - sint^2)

y/2 = sint

x = 2 - 2(y/2)^2

x = 2 - 2(y^2 / 4)

2x = 4 - y^2

y^2 = 4 - 2x

y = (4 - 2x)^1/2

can't square root a negative number therefore:

x < 2 (less than or equal to)

also from 0 < t < pi/2

when t = pi/2, x = 0

therefore the domain = 0 < x < 2 (thats equal to as well for both sides)



thanks i got it now ! another question, review exercise question 77 (the last one) (b) when integrating if I take limits 0 to 2pi, it gives me a negative area. The magnititude is correct. How do i know that I have to take 2pi to 0 instead of 0 to 2pi ?
http://www.examsolutions.co.uk/a-level-maths-papers/Edexcel/Core-Maths/Core-Maths-C4/2006-June/paper.php
can someone please help me on question 6)d) they are getting the answer as 1.6479 and i am getting 1.2958 ???

i used integration by parts
i got this when i integrated
(Inx)(x-1)-x+In(x)+c?
Reply 1782
Did anyone else find the jan12 paper ridiculously easy compared to other papers? :s-smilie:
Reply 1783
Original post by shahruk
thanks i got it now ! another question, review exercise question 77 (the last one) (b) when integrating if I take limits 0 to 2pi, it gives me a negative area. The magnititude is correct. How do i know that I have to take 2pi to 0 instead of 0 to 2pi ?



If its a negative area does it not just mean it is under the x-axis?
Original post by Arusa01
Did anyone else find the jan12 paper ridiculously easy compared to other papers? :s-smilie:


really the last question was hard the 8 marks one?
Reply 1785
Original post by Dan4444
If its a negative area does it not just mean it is under the x-axis?


negetive area means the curve is like a n .. and then you have to make it positive... nomral trapizium cures are 'u' 's
Original post by Lalaa
negetive area means the curve is like a n .. and then you have to make it positive... nomral trapizium cures are 'u' 's


hi how are u how did u find bio :wink: can u help me on this please http://www.examsolutions.co.uk/a-lev...June/paper.php
can someone please help me on question 6)d) they are getting the answer as 1.6479 and i am getting 1.2958 ???

i used integration by parts
i got this when i integrated
(Inx)(x-1)-x+In(x)+c?
Reply 1787
Original post by otrivine
really the last question was hard the 8 marks one?


I kinda liked it :s-smilie: lol.
Original post by Arva
Damn it you beat me. :colonhash:


Could you explain this to me then?



In part (c), why is the denominator of dydx\frac{dy}{dx} taken instead of the numerator?
Original post by Arusa01
I kinda liked it :s-smilie: lol.



Original post by otrivine
hi how are u how did u find bio :wink: can u help me on this please http://www.examsolutions.co.uk/a-lev...June/paper.php
can someone please help me on question 6)d) they are getting the answer as 1.6479 and i am getting 1.2958 ???

i used integration by parts
i got this when i integrated
(Inx)(x-1)-x+In(x)+c?


loooooooooooooooool
Original post by Arusa01
I kinda liked it :s-smilie: lol.

can u show it to me :smile: did u integrate like move them to one side?:confused:
Do we need to know any proofs?
Can someone write out all the areas and volumes of shapes we need to know for a possible rates of change question please?
Reply 1793
Original post by otrivine
hi how are u how did u find bio :wink: can u help me on this please http://www.examsolutions.co.uk/a-lev...June/paper.php
can someone please help me on question 6)d) they are getting the answer as 1.6479 and i am getting 1.2958 ???

i used integration by parts
i got this when i integrated
(Inx)(x-1)-x+In(x)+c?



hey i found it WERIDD!... mmm.. i cant open the link =\
Reply 1794
Original post by ezioaudi77
Could you explain this to me then?



In part (c), why is the denominator of dydx\frac{dy}{dx} taken instead of the numerator?


Infinite gradient - this means that the divisor (denominator) is 0, as any number divided by 0 is an infinite number.
Reply 1795
Original post by Arusa01
Did anyone else find the jan12 paper ridiculously easy compared to other papers? :s-smilie:


must be, iirc it was like 90% for an A. all papers that round were easy, got 84 and 87% in c3 and d1 and still got Bs :/
Reply 1796
http://www.sci2.co.uk/maths/C4/Solomon/C4L.pdf

Integrate sin(3x)cos(x)
3.b. mark scheme isn't really helpful... I think they use a trig identity

http://www.sci2.co.uk/maths/C4/Solomon/C4Lmarks.pdf
Reply 1797
I'm struggling with chapter 6, integration,...can somebody explain that one please??? Just a quick revision is okei,...
Thanks...
Reply 1798
These two vectors are collinear, right?

R1 = 1i +2j +3k + x(ai +bj +ck)

R2 = 4i +5j +6k + y(ai +bj +ck)
Original post by Lalaa
hey i found it WERIDD!... mmm.. i cant open the link =\


its the June 2006 paper http://www.edexcel.com/quals/gce/gce08/maths/Pages/default.aspx

Latest

Trending

Trending