The Student Room Group

George Entwistle Resigns

The BBC's director general, George Entwistle, has resigned in the wake of the Newsnight child abuse broadcast.

In a statement given outside New Broadcasting House, Mr Entwistle said: "I have decided that the honourable thing to do is to step down."

Earlier, Mr Entwistle said the Newsnight report, which wrongly implicated ex-senior Tory Lord McAlpine should never have been broadcast.

The broadcast covered cases of child abuse at north Wales care homes.

Mr Entwistle took up the post of director general on 17 September.

In his statement, he said: "In the light of the fact that the director general is also the editor in chief and ultimately responsible for all content, and in the light of the unacceptable journalistic standards of the Newsnight film broadcast on Friday 2 November, I have decided that the honourable thing to do is to step down from the post of director general."

'Great honour'

He said that when he was appointed to the role, he was confident BBC trustees had chosen the best candidate for the post and the "right person to tackle the challenges and opportunities ahead".

"However the wholly exceptional events of the past few weeks have led me to conclude that the BBC should appoint a new leader," he said.

"To have been the director general of the BBC even for a short period, and in the most challenging of circumstances, has been a great honour.

"While there is understandable public concern over a number of issues well covered in the media - which I'm confident will be addressed by the review process - we must not lose sight of the fact that the BBC is full of people of the greatest talent and the highest integrity.

BBC Trust chairman Lord Patten, who made a statement following Mr Entwistle's resignation, said: "This is undoubtedly one of the saddest evenings of my public life."

He said: "At the heart of the BBC is its role as a trusted global news organisation.

"As the editor in chief of that news organisation George has very honourably offered us his resignation because of the unacceptable mistakes - the unacceptable shoddy journalism - which has caused us so much controversy.

"He has behaved as editor with huge honour and courage and would that the rest of the world always behaved the same."

Acting DG

Culture Secretary Maria Miller said: "It is a regrettable, but right decision. It is vital that credibility and public trust in this important national institution is restored.

"It is now crucial that the BBC puts the systems in place to ensure it can make first class news and current affairs programmes."

Tim Davie, currently chief executive of BBC Worldwide, will take over as acting director general from Sunday.

BBC home editor Mark Easton said the BBC was at a "real crossroads, because its whole future depends on convincing the public in the United Kingdom that this is an organisation in which they have confidence, and in which they have trust, and that they believe in the integrity of our news coverage".

The organisation is, in some ways, in a very dangerous position, he added.

Newsnight reported on 2 November an abuse victim's claims against a leading 1980s Tory politician.

Wrongly identified

Lord McAlpine, although not named on Newsnight, was wrongly identified on the internet as the alleged abuser at care homes in north Wales in the 1980s.

The former senior Tory has said the claims are "wholly false and seriously defamatory".

One abuse victim, Steve Messham, has apologised to Lord McAlpine, Tory treasurer during Margaret Thatcher's leadership, after saying he did not assault him.

Mr Messham said in the 1990s he was shown a photograph by police of his alleged abuser but was incorrectly told it was Lord McAlpine.

The BBC has ordered an "immediate pause" in Newsnight investigations to assess editorial robustness and a suspension of all co-productions with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, which worked on the Newsnight broadcast.

Before his departure, Mr Entwistle had commissioned a report from BBC Scotland director Ken MacQuarrie into what happened with the Newsnight investigation.

And the BBC also ordered a senior news executive to "supervise" Friday night's edition of Newsnight, during which an apology was broadcast.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20284124
Reply 1
scumbag
Reply 2
I really don't understand - what actually happened? I thought the BBC was not responsible for Lord McAlpine's name being released as the person who supposedly abused someone. And didn't whoever it was withdraw the allegations afterwards?
It was a matter of time... The grilling at BBC's Today's Show sealed the deal.
Reply 4
Original post by cactussed
I really don't understand


The BBC decided to grant significant time on the Newsnight programme to air assertions by (as is now apparent) an unreliable witness to abuse by Lord McAlpine.

The discussion was framed as "Senior former Conservative politicians" by interviewing and presenting journalists, and further Mr. Entwistle claims complete ignorance of the film until it was released.

Crucially, the claimant was not provided the opportunity by the BBC to see a picture of Lord McAlpine to ensure that he was accusing whom he thought to be the right man.

This generates significant public resentment because as a public institution, though the BBC should in no way be curtailed by the government of the day, nor should it be a mouthpiece for whomever it wishes, as it is the funding of licence-fee payers that keep the corporation running.

Further, the impression is given that the BBC attempted to redirect blame for the child sex-abuse scandal onto the Conservative Party, which traditionally wishes to curtail public funding. This would, of course, be extremely underhand, biased, and inappropriate.

It is true that the BBC did not name Lord McAlpine. A suitable comparison in my view is if, say, Nick Griffin were devoted time to an exclusive interview where he is free to make remarks as he wishes, and the interviewer in no way challenges those views or intervenes.

It really is a very serious breach of what we have the BBC for, and it was right that Mr. Entwistle resigned.

As an aside, it's probably unwise to suggest ill of the University Chancellor, but Lord Patten should also consider his position.
Reply 5
Another nail is the coffin!.
Reply 6
Original post by Pandabär
Do the BBC explicitly support a party (e.g. New Labour) anywhere on their manifesto, or are they supposed to not be biased? :confused: Who is the BBC run by nowadays?


They are impartial (although some argue that they are not). I'm sorry for this link but it explains everything :smile:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/insidethebbc/managementstructure/
Reply 7
Seems like they are damned if they do and damned if they don't... They were duped by a total liar, while they were on the back foot after not airing the show about Saville.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending