A lot of people seem to feel that taking the Lit/ Lang A-Level worked against them . . . well, don't you think universities are incredibly narrow minded about that?! I had a feeling that my doing the combined course was going to prove a problem after reading Warwick's prospectus and going to a departmental open day. Sure enough, Warwick rejected me for English and Creative Writing, as did UEA. In the end, I got offers from Royal Holloway (ABB), Lancaster (ABB) and Hull (BBB). I'm predicted AAAA and am going to have a stab at the English AEA in the summer.
The fact that I'm doing the combined course does not make me any less able than someone doing straight Literature. I chose Lit/Lang partly because it fitted in better on the timetable, but also because I wanted to learn more about the language side of English and not specialise too early. The coursework also included original writing options, which I wouldn't have been able to do if I'd opted for pure Lit. The point I'm trying to make is that I had personal reasons for choosing the course I'm doing - I didn't go for it simply because I thought it would be easier.
I'm going to Lancaster now, not because I don't think I'm capable of getting into somewhere like Warwick, but simply because I don't think it's worth the hassle of re-applying. There IS an element of luck in the selection process and many people on this forum are testament to the fact that you can have brilliant grades and still not get in. To anyone who feels they have been rejected unfairly, I would say go to the next best place and just prove them wrong! At the end of the day, it isn't going to make a vast amount of difference to your future career prospects where your degree comes from - it's what you get out of it that counts.