The Student Room Group

Cambridge Law Students and Applicants

Scroll to see replies

Original post by zaidf
Hullo, I've been sent a reading list from Christ's College (where I'll hopefully be going in October), and I was wondering if anyone had any particular recommendations? I'm hoping to read a book or two from each section, but it's highly unlikely I'll go through them all (the letter says it's not compulsory to read them all).

Constitutional
Tomkins - Public Law (2003)
Munro - Studies in Constitutional Law (2nd ed 1999)
King - Does the United Kingdom Still Have a Constitution? (2001)

Criminal
Ashworth - Principles of Criminal Law (6th ed 2009)
Herring - Great Debates in Criminal Law (2009)
Padfield - Criminal Law (8th ed 2012)

Tort
Hedley - Tort (7th ed 2011)
Weir - An Introduction to Tort Law (2nd ed 2006)

Civil
Crook - The Law and Life of Rome (1967)
Stein - Roman Law in European History (1998)


So ... any personal preferences? I'm pretty sure I'll read King's book because it looks quite short (:biggrin:) and the letter mentions it specifically, but I have no idea which of the others to choose. I'd really appreciate any advice. Many thanks!


You'll be fine doing none of it tbh. Doesn't make much difference at all.
Original post by zaidf
Hullo, I've been sent a reading list from Christ's College (where I'll hopefully be going in October), and I was wondering if anyone had any particular recommendations? I'm hoping to read a book or two from each section, but it's highly unlikely I'll go through them all (the letter says it's not compulsory to read them all).

Constitutional
Tomkins - Public Law (2003)
Munro - Studies in Constitutional Law (2nd ed 1999)
King - Does the United Kingdom Still Have a Constitution? (2001)
CriminalAshworth - Principles of Criminal Law (6th ed 2009)
Herring - Great Debates in Criminal Law (2009)
Padfield - Criminal Law (8th ed 2012)TortHedley - Tort (7th ed 2011)
Weir - An Introduction to Tort Law (2nd ed 2006)Civil
Crook - The Law and Life of Rome (1967)
Stein - Roman Law in European History (1998)
So ... any personal preferences? I'm pretty sure I'll read King's book because it looks quite short (:biggrin:) and the letter mentions it specifically, but I have no idea which of the others to choose. I'd really appreciate any advice. Many thanks!
Original post by Doughnuts!!
You'll be fine do
Original post by Doughnuts!!
ing none of it tbh. Doesn't make much difference at all.


I'm going to second this as strongly as I can. Until you've done a term or so you don't really know what you need to know/ how to learn it. For first year, just wait until you get to uni.

(Though Tomkins is quite a good read, albeit that it's a little old. If you're going to read one, read Tomkins. Crook is a very good book to have for when you're actually doing the course, but don't bother reading it before you get there.)

edit: literally no idea what's going on with the bold/ italics/ quoting etc. I do wish TSR had just left it at BB code, it's perfectly good enough and doesn't **** up like this.

Original post by ratio
Anyone have any advice on books or general survival for Part 1A?


Books.

Tort -- Do not buy markesinis and deakin, it's quite well written but far too old now. I like winfield and jolowicz. Case books are useful -- Mullis and Oliphant is great. It looks daunting, but if you need help on a point, Clerk and Lindsell is fantastically concise and very well referenced.

Criminal -- Simester and Sullivan is far the best imho. Buy that one. Occasionally you may want to use library copies of (a) Smith and Hogan, for help with specific points and especially to contrast the views of Simester and Smith (or Ormerod, now) on accessorial liability and (b) Ashworth's principles of criminal law, which is a nice, helpful book because Ashworth is one of the leading theorists and writes all his ideas down in his book. Herring is highly superficial on substantive law, but I hear he's useful for theory. Generally I wouldn't bother with case books -- criminal cases are usually quite short, and so can quite easily be read in full.

Civil. Thomas. You probably can't buy it because it's been out of print for ages and second hand copies sell for £hundreds, but if you have to wait to use your library copy, it's worth it. Borkowski is also quite nice. If the two disagree, follow Thomas. Look at Crook occasionally for background. Other than that, you'll probably be given brief-ish digest extracts, which I used as my other main source of info.

Consti. Bradley and Ewing is a piece of poo, with the exception of the judicial review section, where it is quite nicely concise and has useful footnotes. I agree with the above comment on Jowell, it's great. I didn't use Elliott's public law book. (I did get his admin book for judicial review. Don't do that unless you really want to waste a tonne of time.) I hated turpin and tomkins, particularly on the rule of law where they go through talking about cases on the rule of law without ever mentioning how the concept might be defined.

edit: Nicholas. I forgot Nicholas. Read him.
(edited 11 years ago)
Reply 2062
Original post by gethsemane342

x


Thanks! I'm a bit worried about the workload so I'm going to focus on general survival first, hence my question. If I get the hang of that, I'll ask for advise on how to get a first (however lofty that goal may be). And yeah, I'm expecting that people hold themselves to high standards but I'm hoping that doesn't translate into being outwardly competitive - I don't see how that is useful.

Original post by wawa1906
x

Thanks a lot. Won't plan on getting anything till I know what's available to me in the libraries and how accessible they are.

Original post by TimmonaPortella
x

I really appreciate the specific and detailed feedback. Thanks.
(edited 11 years ago)
Original post by zaidf
Hullo, I've been sent a reading list from Christ's College (where I'll hopefully be going in October), and I was wondering if anyone had any particular recommendations? I'm hoping to read a book or two from each section, but it's highly unlikely I'll go through them all (the letter says it's not compulsory to read them all).


Don't bother. You won't remember any of it. You don't need to bother with pre-reading for any of the 3 years. I tried doing some for 1st and 2nd year, didn't really help. Did nothing for 3rd year and still did well.

Has your academic sibling not told you this? Standards are clearly slipping - we all told ours not to do it and I think they told the next batch not to bother. But yeah, just take this time out to relax.


Original post by ratio
Thanks! I'm a bit worried about the workload so I'm going to focus on general survival first, hence my question. If I get the hang of that, I'll ask for advise on how to get a first (however lofty that goal may be). And yeah, I'm expecting that people hold themselves to high standards but I'm hoping that doesn't translate into being outwardly competitive - I don't see how that is useful.


The secret to the workload is to learn good time management. My method for 2nd and 3rd year (where the workload deepens) was to work ahead a bit at the beginning of every term. This meant that I was always a few days ahead of myself in termtime and so I had the time to do what I wanted. In first year, I tried just leaving things till they came up and immersed myself in loads of societies. Great fun except I spent a *lot* of nights working till 3 or 4am. When I became more realistic about what I had time to do, the number of long nights went down dramatically and my social life improved.
Tbh, in first year, you're gonna go a bit nuts and time management will be tricky. But just make sure your time management is flexible and you'll cope.

As for the thing about getting a first, I know a lot of freshers think they'll get one, and it causes a lot of stress. Whatever you want, DON'T compare yourself to everyone else and DON'T take CamCors to heart. That is a survival tip - if I'd followed that advice in first year, I'd have been happier and probably would have done better overall (I'm happy with my Part IA mark as I was expecting lower. But having graduated and now knowing what I'm capable of, I do believe I would have done better if I hadn't allowed my confidence to get knocked so much)

Also, experiment with textbooks. What book works for one person won't necessarily work for you. As an example, in land we were told to use Gray and Gray. I only started doing well when I used Dixon, which wasn't a set text for us but I found a lot better.
(edited 11 years ago)
Original post by gethsemane342


The secret to the workload is to learn good time management. My method for 2nd and 3rd year (where the workload deepens) was to work ahead a bit at the beginning of every term. This meant that I was always a few days ahead of myself in termtime and so I had the time to do what I wanted. In first year, I tried just leaving things till they came up and immersed myself in loads of societies. Great fun except I spent a *lot* of nights working till 3 or 4am. When I became more realistic about what I had time to do, the number of long nights went down dramatically and my social life improved.
Tbh, in first year, you're gonna go a bit nuts and time management will be tricky. But just make sure your time management is flexible and you'll cope.


THIS THIS THIS a million times over. If there is a single piece of advice I would say that every incoming fresher should pay attention to, it's this.

I was constantly behind, constantly rushing (most) supervision essays a few hours before supervisions and had far too much to catch up on during the Easter holidays all because I simply did too much non-work stuff during term time. I worked 14 hour days for 3 weeks solid during the Easter holidays and still didn't learn everything I had to in time for exams. Needless to say, I did pretty badly in exams and ended up cramming the night before 3 out of 4 of my exams.

If I could go back and change something, I would listen to the advice that somebody told me and do only 2 or 3 things that you love doing outside of work. If you do this and don't leave things until the last minute, you should find that you'll be able to juggle everything well and still have time for socialising with friends/going out/whatever.
Reply 2065
The confidence thing that gethsemane mentioned and the potential it has to affect how you do is interesting. This sounds really depressing but don't panic if/when you have a mini-breakdown. A lot of my friends had them. I remember after one supervision with a particularly brutal/perplexing supervisor I walked around Sainsburys for about 25 minutes pondering how **** I was at law (pretty sure all I bought was a tin of beans or something :P). There are points where you think it's never gonna make sense, but eventually it does (in saying that I walked into most exams praying a few things didn't come up cos I had no idea how they worked).

Time management is a biggie. Something we were never told that might be worth noting, although I don't encourage it too much, is that supervisors are usually very accommodating if you have a legitimate reason for needing an extension. Some supervisors are really approachable, others not so much; I think in freshers' minds (or mine at least) they had some sort of scary demi-god status. They don't really. And they know how much pressure you're under. So don't drive yourself insane.

I'm ranting. I'll stop.
Hello everyone,

I've been looking through Oxbridge law course electives. Despite initially preferring Cambridge for various reasons, I've noticed that "International Trade" (something I'm interested in) isn't on on Cambridge's list. Is this topic included in another elective? Or is this simply not taught in Cambridge?

Thank you.
Original post by icycreamy6
Hello everyone,

I've been looking through Oxbridge law course electives. Despite initially preferring Cambridge for various reasons, I've noticed that "International Trade" (something I'm interested in) isn't on on Cambridge's list. Is this topic included in another elective? Or is this simply not taught in Cambridge?

Thank you.


If you mean the undergrad course, no, it isn't as such. The internationalish topics you can do are:

- International Public law (i.e. who owns that pile of rocks in the middle of the ocean/should we go around invading countries)

- Conflict of Laws - this is private international law about jurisdiction, choice of law and application of foreign law. Probably the closest you'll get to International Trade

- EU law (obviously)

- There used to be a Competition Law half-paper but I don't know if it's still there. They cut it for my year as Dr Odudu went on sabbatical, I dunno if he's back or not to do it.

- I don't know if commercial law covers international aspects but I doubt it.
Original post by gethsemane342
If you mean the undergrad course, no, it isn't as such. The internationalish topics you can do are:

- International Public law (i.e. who owns that pile of rocks in the middle of the ocean/should we go around invading countries)

- Conflict of Laws - this is private international law about jurisdiction, choice of law and application of foreign law. Probably the closest you'll get to International Trade

- EU law (obviously)

- There used to be a Competition Law half-paper but I don't know if it's still there. They cut it for my year as Dr Odudu went on sabbatical, I dunno if he's back or not to do it.

- I don't know if commercial law covers international aspects but I doubt it.


Competition's currently suspended. Apparently Commercial Law covers the Sale of Goods Act 1979 provisions in detail (and they form the main focus), so I doubt there's a lot of international law.
Original post by Doughnuts!!
THIS THIS THIS a million times over. If there is a single piece of advice I would say that every incoming fresher should pay attention to, it's this.

I was constantly behind, constantly rushing (most) supervision essays a few hours before supervisions and had far too much to catch up on during the Easter holidays all because I simply did too much non-work stuff during term time. I worked 14 hour days for 3 weeks solid during the Easter holidays and still didn't learn everything I had to in time for exams. Needless to say, I did pretty badly in exams and ended up cramming the night before 3 out of 4 of my exams.

If I could go back and change something, I would listen to the advice that somebody told me and do only 2 or 3 things that you love doing outside of work. If you do this and don't leave things until the last minute, you should find that you'll be able to juggle everything well and still have time for socialising with friends/going out/whatever.


Oh god, that's even more terrifying than my DoS-to-be's statement that "if you can knock out something like the leader column in The Times when the need arises, you will have no problems in writing a Cambridge essay". :s:
Original post by a.byrnie
Oh god, that's even more terrifying than my DoS-to-be's statement that "if you can knock out something like the leader column in The Times when the need arises, you will have no problems in writing a Cambridge essay". :s:


Oh no, don't worry, you very quickly get good at bashing out essays! It's daunting at first but you do get used to it!

The quote by me was more of a reflection of just how much I missed out during the year and how I screwed myself over!
Would anyone on here who has international law sup sheets for michaelmas be willing to send them to me, please? :smile:
Original post by TimmonaPortella
Would anyone on here who has international law sup sheets for michaelmas be willing to send them to me, please? :smile:


Are you trying to work ahead? :s-smilie:

I've tried that before. It won't work if you do it this early. You'll just forget it all again. Either that or you'll do so much extra reading, you'll get bogged down in detail and miss the big picture (and international is a big picture subject)
Original post by gethsemane342
Are you trying to work ahead? :s-smilie:

I've tried that before. It won't work if you do it this early. You'll just forget it all again. Either that or you'll do so much extra reading, you'll get bogged down in detail and miss the big picture (and international is a big picture subject)


Yeah, I'm going to do a bit ahead. I'm away a couple of weeks in september so I want to get started now. Don't worry, I won't overreach myself. I'm just going to get through a couple of supervisions, gradually, and hopefully make up some notes to save myself time when I want to moot. If I keep ticking over a (relatively) small amount of material, I figure I should be able to keep it in my head.
Reply 2074
Original post by gethsemane342
x


Original post by Doughnuts!!
x


Original post by wawa1906
x


Thanks a lot everyone, that's all helpful to bear in mind.

Original post by Tortious
X.

Currently, re-reading "Letters to a law student". McBride sounds like an entertaining, and intimidatingly smart, DoS.

Then again, maybe most of them are like that - I felt the same about my DoS, who I'm actually excited to meet again. (Three minutes into my interview, he mentioned based off a point in my SAQ, that he admitted Virgo to Cambridge. I muttered "oh, so I'm screwed" under my breath but he was nice to me anyway. He also seemed like a no BS guy - he suggested I call him mad at one point when I tried to disagree with him politely.) *ends unnecessary rant about why JH seems awesome.*
Does anyone have a copy of 'Per Incuriam' they could email me? I'm thinking of setting up a student law review at my university and wanted to get a look at an existing one for some ideas - not that my uni would be able to match the quality, I wouldn't think. I can PM any taker my email address :smile:
Original post by Forum User
Does anyone have a copy of 'Per Incuriam' they could email me? I'm thinking of setting up a student law review at my university and wanted to get a look at an existing one for some ideas - not that my uni would be able to match the quality, I wouldn't think. I can PM any taker my email address :smile:


I don't. I was about to say yes but it was on my Hermes which has since been deleted.

Tortious
...


Kid, I believe Per Inc is *your* forte?
I want to study law at Cambridge university (typical, huh?) and my GCSE's went well, and I'm now doing my AS levels.

I was just wondering what the benefits of doing the DofE would be for someone in my position? Would it be worth it or would it be simple be a pointless part of my applicant that they glance over once and never look over again?

Thank you.
Reply 2078
The extent to which extra-curriculars are relevant is questionable, I'd say. There are lots of really good skills that DofE allows you to develop, so it's definitely worth doing and will be good for situational interviews you might have. It's not worth nothing in the admissions process, but if you're only doing it cos it *might* improve your Cambridge law application, I wouldn't bother.

Do you do other extra curricular things?
Won't have that much of an effect on your application.

But DofE's a laugh. Do it for the funny moments you get out if it :smile:

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending