The Student Room Group
Students on campus at the University of Warwick
University of Warwick
Coventry

Warwick Maths Chat

Scroll to see replies

Reply 4380
Could anyone give me advice about choosing between imperial and warwick for maths? Really stuck because i liked the campus, maths building and course when i came to visit warwick, but people say imperial has a much more prestigious name.
Students on campus at the University of Warwick
University of Warwick
Coventry
Original post by hbs31
Could anyone give me advice about choosing between imperial and warwick for maths? Really stuck because i liked the campus, maths building and course when i came to visit warwick, but people say imperial has a much more prestigious name.


Warwick and Imperial are fairly equal in terms of their maths courses, and comfortably ahead of everybody else (that isn't Oxbridge). Pick whichever you prefer, there's really not much in it.
Original post by kkboyk
I'm confident in my A-level grades, but I reckon I may get a 2.

So do you mean you think you'll get A*AA and a 2? I obviously can't say for certain what will happen, but there's always a chance you'll get in if you just miss it.
Original post by TheIrrational
So do you mean you think you'll get A*AA and a 2? I obviously can't say for certain what will happen, but there's always a chance you'll get in if you just miss it.


Yes. I may as well work extremely hard to try and get a 1 in STEP I starting next month.
Original post by hbs31
Could anyone give me advice about choosing between imperial and warwick for maths? Really stuck because i liked the campus, maths building and course when i came to visit warwick, but people say imperial has a much more prestigious name.


Look at the modules they offer and see if they interest you, and other factors such as bursaries. Warwick offer a wide range of different foulest, whereas Imperial is mostly pure maths, but then Imperial are very generous and offer large amount of bursaries to their students.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by kkboyk
Yes. I may as well work extremely hard to try and get a 1 in STEP I starting next month.


Is there any particular reason you won't be able to get A*A*A (as then you would only need a 2 in STEP)?
Original post by brittanna
Is there any particular reason you won't be able to get A*A*A (as then you would only need a 2 in STEP)?


Mostly because my school is making me do the modules I dislike and struggle on (S1, D2), so I'm confident I will get an A, but not an A*.

I'm planning on covering them along.with FP2 and C3-4 after my last a-level exqms, as well as STEP prep.
Original post by kkboyk
Mostly because my school is making me do the modules I dislike and struggle on (S1, D2), so I'm confident I will get an A, but not an A*.

I'm planning on covering them along.with FP2 and C3-4 after my last a-level exqms, as well as STEP prep.


Even if you struggle with them, it is much easier to get an A*A*A and a 2 in STEP than it is to get a 1 in STEP.
Original post by BlueSam3
Warwick and Imperial are fairly equal in terms of their maths courses, and comfortably ahead of everybody else (that isn't Oxbridge). Pick whichever you prefer, there's really not much in it.


Durham maths is up there too. Why does everyone seem to forget Durham :dontknow:

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by brittanna
Even if you struggle with them, it is much easier to get an A*A*A and a 2 in STEP than it is to get a 1 in STEP.


That's true. I'm also planning on applying to UCL, but they require a grade 1 -.-
Coming to the end of exams and clearing up, I've counted how many pages of assignments I've submitted this year - 312.. 100 of which from intro to number theory...
Original post by TheIrrational
Coming to the end of exams and clearing up, I've counted how many pages of assignments I've submitted this year - 312.. 100 of which from intro to number theory...



Yeah, some of those INT assignments were awfully tedious.
Anyone have a super secret link to MA106 past paper solutions or am I basically screwed?
Original post by Dilzo999
Anyone have a super secret link to MA106 past paper solutions or am I basically screwed?


The 2010 and 2008 ones are available on the undergrad handbook. Not aware of any others available.
Original post by BlueSam3
The 2010 and 2008 ones are available on the undergrad handbook. Not aware of any others available.

Yeah I know about those ones. Just wondering as there was this one question which said "Define determinant" and I wanted to know if writing down the formula would get me all 4 marks or if I need to add more :s-smilie:.
Reply 4395
I've finished my exams and I want the whole world to know!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I did 10 exams this year, combinatorics, measure theory, functional analysis 1, matrix analysis and algorithms, complex analysis, probability theory, functional analysis 2, ergodic theory, lie algebras and introduction to mathematical finance
Original post by fGDu
I've finished my exams and I want the whole world to know!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I did 10 exams this year, combinatorics, measure theory, functional analysis 1, matrix analysis and algorithms, complex analysis, probability theory, functional analysis 2, ergodic theory, lie algebras and introduction to mathematical finance


Congrats !
Any comments on those modules? In paticular measure theory, complex analysis, functional analysis and probability theory.
Reply 4397
Original post by hassassin04
Congrats !
Any comments on those modules? In paticular measure theory, complex analysis, functional analysis and probability theory.


Measure theory is something you should definitely learn. Very interesting, similar to analysis III but more advanced. Complex Analysis is very boring, had some cool results but I just couldn't be arsed. Functional Analysis is very fun and pretty much what I specialise in. You will cover Measure Theory in both FA courses, so they go very well together. Probability Theory is interesting but ultimately very easy if you've already done Measure Theory. It helps you understand martingales and conditional probability, which is useful for 4th year maths.
Original post by fGDu
Measure theory is something you should definitely learn. Very interesting, similar to analysis III but more advanced. Complex Analysis is very boring, had some cool results but I just couldn't be arsed. Functional Analysis is very fun and pretty much what I specialise in. You will cover Measure Theory in both FA courses, so they go very well together. Probability Theory is interesting but ultimately very easy if you've already done Measure Theory. It helps you understand martingales and conditional probability, which is useful for 4th year maths.


Did you do maths of random events last year?
So maths of random events ( which should be re-introduced next year as a third year module) + probability theory+ measure theory sounds like a good combination :biggrin:

I have heard horrible things about measure theory lecturer this year.. No printed notes and very bad handwriting. Did you learn it by going to his lectures or using other resources?
Reply 4399
Original post by hassassin04
Did you do maths of random events last year?
So maths of random events ( which should be re-introduced next year as a third year module) + probability theory+ measure theory sounds like a good combination :biggrin:

I have heard horrible things about measure theory lecturer this year.. No printed notes and very bad handwriting. Did you learn it by going to his lectures or using other resources?


I didn't do maths of random events last year because it had too many 9ams. I don't see how it could be a 3rd year module because probability theory is the 3rd year module for it.

Measure Theory was taught by my tutor this year, so obviously I'm well acquainted with him... Measure Theory is a very very universal topic, so to teach yourself from some resource would be easy to do. There are notes from 2014 which he put online and they were easy to follow. His lectures were bad but its such a core topic to analysis beyond 2nd year that it didn't bother me. (I'm an analysis freak)

Quick Reply

Latest