Did contract law final today. Nobody in my college wants to discuss the paper so I'll come here. There was a part of a problem question:
"C has advertised a set of rare stamps in a specialist stamp-collecting magazine, saying that they will be auctioned on *date* but he might take exceptional private offers beforehand. C sells one especially valuable stamp to E before the auction. At the auction, the listing does not include that stamp, but F bids £30,000 for the lot and wins, having read the magazine advertisement and being under the belief that the stamp sold to E was included in the lot.
Advise F".
This seemed a little bit simple to me, so can someone confirm that the approach to this (as one part of a longer problem, so not something we spend more than 10-15 minutes on) is Smith v Hughes principle -> mention Scriven v Hindley -> distinguish Scriven?