The Student Room Group

How likely is it HS2 will be stopped?

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Quady
How will improved links between the business parks of the M6/M62 corridor and London take money from the North West?



It won't. But it will affect some house prices. What better a way to protect your investment than make stuff up about taking business away. The same people are probably advocating closing down motorways as well as an economic.

I see somebody else is trying to push the pollution issue. Intersting as we already know
That there's less impact than currently.

As somebody has already correctly stated. Our rail lines aren't as in good a condition as our European cousins due to the fact that the Luftwaffe weren't that effective. It needs upgrading to modern standards. Tarting up an existing line won't do it.
Reply 21
Original post by Quady
Lack of passport, which unless the SNP win next year won't be an issue with staying in the UK.

Also, lower living standards.


A passport costs about £80. If you were seriously considering moving abroad, I don't see how that could be the main thing holding you back. Also I think it is possible to get a flight within the EEA without a passport as long as you have some other form of ID.

Lower living standards? Plenty of countries in Europe with living standards at least as good as the UK.
I reckon it'll be stopped, when Conservative get ousted at the next election, which they will.

...though I don't particularly want Ernie off Sesame Street running the country either.

Might vote BNP, simply because the egging when Griffin gets sworn in would be ​magnificent.
Reply 23
Original post by Psyk
A passport costs about £80. If you were seriously considering moving abroad, I don't see how that could be the main thing holding you back. Also I think it is possible to get a flight within the EEA without a passport as long as you have some other form of ID.

Lower living standards? Plenty of countries in Europe with living standards at least as good as the UK.


Yeah if I were seriously considering moving abroad - why wouldn't I just move to Canterbury?

Which? the only one I can think of is Germany.
Reply 24
Original post by Quady
Yeah if I were seriously considering moving abroad - why wouldn't I just move to Canterbury?

Which? the only one I can think of is Germany.


Netherlands, Luxembourg, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland, Austria.
Reply 25
Original post by Psyk
Netherlands, Luxembourg, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland, Austria.


Do any of them have high speed trains running in them? If not then whats the relevance?

To my knowledge of that list (I agree they have higher living standards) Switzerland is the closest as its building a high speed freight line...
This.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Speed_2

links to this.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Speed_1

Which ultimately links to this

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-European_high-speed_rail_network


so what we have is an awful lot of people complaining about the government not doing enough to create jobs, and then when it does. They don't want it. Take your pick. HS2. Fracking. Nuclear power generation.
Original post by Quady
Do any of them have high speed trains running in them? If not then whats the relevance?

To my knowledge of that list (I agree they have higher living standards) Switzerland is the closest as its building a high speed freight line...



http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-European_high-speed_rail_network
Reply 28
Original post by MatureStudent36
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-European_high-speed_rail_network


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-speed_rail_in_Europe

Seems like the Netherlands does too, it wasn't listed on:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-speed_rail#Major_markets
Reply 29
Original post by MatureStudent36
This.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Speed_2

links to this.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Speed_1

Which ultimately links to this

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-European_high-speed_rail_network


so what we have is an awful lot of people complaining about the government not doing enough to create jobs, and then when it does. They don't want it. Take your pick. HS2. Fracking. Nuclear power generation.


Sorry I don't get it, I thought the poster was suggesting I go to Europe as there is high speed rail there. I said there are lower living standards and now people are either suggesting I go to Norway etc (which doesn't have high speed rail) or Spain (which does but now resembles Ethiopia).
Reply 30
Original post by MatureStudent36
so what we have is an awful lot of people complaining about the government not doing enough to create jobs, and then when it does. They don't want it. Take your pick. HS2. Fracking. Nuclear power generation.

I'm sure they could "create jobs" which aren't environment destroying.

And an argument I've seen thrown around a lot is "it's not for the government to create jobs" :wink:
Original post by Quady
Sorry I don't get it, I thought the poster was suggesting I go to Europe as there is high speed rail there. I said there are lower living standards and now people are either suggesting I go to Norway etc (which doesn't have high speed rail) or Spain (which does but now resembles Ethiopia).



Norway is rather mountainous and sparsely populated. Not much need for it. Spain's high speed rail network is actually rather good when Islamic fundamentalists aren't blowing it up. Even they're upgrading it to high speed though.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_transport_in_Spain

So basically, there's a plan to connect all of the major cities in Europe with high speed rail links and HS2 is the UKs contribution building upon the work done by HS2.
Reply 32
Original post by MatureStudent36
Norway is rather mountainous and sparsely populated. Not much need for it. Spain's high speed rail network is actually rather good when Islamic fundamentalists aren't blowing it up. Even they're upgrading it to high speed though.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_transport_in_Spain

So basically, there's a plan to connect all of the major cities in Europe with high speed rail links and HS2 is the UKs contribution building upon the work done by HS2.


Right....

So what are my options for higher standard of living and high speed rail?
Reply 33
I live really near Great Missenden, half of which will be demolished for HS2. Add the exceptionally high level of destruction and disruption to the exorbitant cost and I really don't see the point in it at all.
Original post by Skip_Snip
I'm sure they could "create jobs" which aren't environment destroying.

And an argument I've seen thrown around a lot is "it's not for the government to create jobs" :wink:



Invention of the wheel, the boat, the dirt track, the paved road, the railway, the steam engine, the motor car, the internal combustion engine, the bus, the lorry, the car, the horse and cart, the sail boat, the paddle steamer, the screw propellor, the airplane, the jet engine in fact anything that enables people and goods from A to B boosts the economy. All impact on the environment somehow, boost the economy and all raise the standard of living for people. HS2 is likely to actually have an overall benefit getting people off roads and planes.
Reply 35
Original post by MatureStudent36
Invention of the wheel, the boat, the dirt track, the paved road, the railway, the steam engine, the motor car, the internal combustion engine, the bus, the lorry, the car, the horse and cart, the sail boat, the paddle steamer, the screw propellor, the airplane, the jet engine in fact anything that enables people and goods from A to B boosts the economy. All impact on the environment somehow, boost the economy and all raise the standard of living for people. HS2 is likely to actually have an overall benefit getting people off roads and planes.


Getting from A to B is perfectly possible now. All that HS2 would do is shave twenty minutes from the journey. Not as revolutionary as the wheel, combustion engine or roads. For all the damage it would do, and money spent, there should be a better payoff than 20 minutes.
They should be upgrading existing railways in England. We don't need any more. Perhaps try and link northern and southern Wales?


Original post by Skip_Snip
Getting from A to B is perfectly possible now. All that HS2 would do is shave twenty minutes from the journey. Not as revolutionary as the wheel, combustion engine or roads. For all the damage it would do, and money spent, there should be a better payoff than 20 minutes.


I know, right? I would've been more invested in the idea if it involved Half Life dimension portals or something with that £80 billion. Can you imagine if, when it gets finished, it then is met with delays which then causes us to gain **** all? Lol.
(edited 10 years ago)
Original post by Skip_Snip
Getting from A to B is perfectly possible now. All that HS2 would do is shave twenty minutes from the journey. Not as revolutionary as the wheel, combustion engine or roads. For all the damage it would do, and money spent, there should be a better payoff than 20 minutes.


It knocks twenty minutes off the distance from London to birmingham. What's the time saving between birmingham and Berlin?

The great Eastern didn't shave that much time of the journey time across the Atlantic compared to the fastest clipper. But guess what. Steam still took over from sail even though they went to the same places. Broad band took over from dial up even though they did the same job. But one was quicker and boosted the economy.
Reply 38
Original post by MatureStudent36
It knocks twenty minutes off the distance from London to birmingham. What's the time saving between birmingham and Berlin?

The great Eastern didn't shave that much time of the journey time across the Atlantic compared to the fastest clipper. But guess what. Steam still took over from sail even though they went to the same places. Broad band took over from dial up even though they did the same job. But one was quicker and boosted the economy.

And yet for the thing that's actually in question, only twenty is saved.
Original post by Skip_Snip
And yet for the thing that's actually in question, only twenty is saved.



London to birmingham is a twenty minute saving, which will have a positive impact. You've broken thepsychological hour barrier now. London to birmingham in less time tha it gets to catch the bus from one side if birmingham to the other.

However, you've now connected birmingham to Europes rail network.
(edited 10 years ago)

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending