The Student Room Group

Would you rather be homosexual or heterosexual?

Scroll to see replies

Bisexuals have the best of both worlds.
Reply 81
Neither. I'm pansexual because restricting my choice by what people have in their pants just never made sense to me. :p:

Life would probably be ever-so-slightly easier if I were hetero, though.
Reply 82
What kind of stupid question is this anyway :biggrin: why should anyone want to be homosexual or heterosexual, you are what you are and you love who you love
This question is stupid, surely your sexual orientation isn't consciously chosen therefore we can't pick one or the other?
Reply 84
Original post by anosmianAcrimony
They're not...feeling...anyone?

Why, hello there, Freud.

Anyway, how can you claim to know people's motivations in saying what they do?



Lol Freudian slip :colondollar:


Are you saying that you would choose to be gay?
Original post by Red one
Lol Freudian slip :colondollar:


Are you saying that you would choose to be gay?


I don't think so. To be honest, I like being the way I am. I don't really know what being homosexual would be like.

But I'm sure there are plenty of gays who also enjoy being themselves, the way they are. Even if both of us would choose to be heterosexual (assuming you would!) I don't think it's safe to assume everyone would.
Reply 86
straight
because vaginas are no fun
I'd rather people just saw past that and rather be who they are. It's just another box to put people in.
Reply 88
Original post by Namige
were*


Hah, well spotted. :wink:

It confuses me though - surely controversy is singular? Or is it just one of those weird English things?
Reply 89
Original post by Hariex
Hah, well spotted. :wink:

It confuses me though - surely controversy is singular? Or is it just one of those weird English things?
Read up on subjunctive mood.

http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/subjunctive-verbs
Reply 90
I'm happy being gay so I think I'd just stick to what I know :rolleyes:
Hetero because I want to meet god.

100% srs.
Reply 92
Original post by Blast Tyrant
I'd be sceptical of any sources that are to do with sexual topics, they're more often than not horribly skewered in some way, shape or form by the pride of their participants.

This thread is a Freudian goldmine.
(edited 10 years ago)
Reply 93
Original post by Profesh
This thread is a Freudian goldmine.


:s-smilie:
Weird way to describe it.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 94
If there was no stigma then I'd probably pick homosexual.

Because grindr.

But the vagina is where my heart truly lies.
Original post by Hariex
Being a heterosexual means that I do not have to put up with society's intolerance.

The more interesting question would be: "if there was no controversy over homosexuality, would you still prefer to be a heterosexual?"


yes; more potential partners, and two holes are better than one
Original post by jaydoh
This question is stupid, surely your sexual orientation isn't consciously chosen therefore we can't pick one or the other?


we can't? damn, I was about to turn gay.
Reply 97
Original post by InternetGangster
yes; more potential partners, and two holes are better than one


Correction. 3.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest