The Student Room Group

Arsey's Edexcel FP1 S14 (UK (R) IAL) Model Answers IAL added

Scroll to see replies

I can't believe I thought 364/14 was 51. At the time I thought 50 14s go into 350 (instead of 50 7s) and one extra 14. I panicked :sigh:

Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 81
For AB I got:

( 4 5 13)
(5-6 11)
(6 11 21)

So basically the wrong order, how many marks would I lose?

Posted from TSR Mobile
For the last question on divisibility by proof by induction I completely messed up and did something weird this is what i did.

f(k)=8^k-2^k
f(k+1)=8^k+1-2^k+1
f(k+1)-f(k)=8^k+1-2^k+1-(8^k-2^k)
=8^k+1-2^k+1-8^k+2^k
=8.(8^k)-2.(2^k)-8^k+2^k
=7.(8^k)-1.(2^k)
=7.8(1^K)-1.2(1^K)
=56(1^K)-2(1^K)
=54(1^K)
=6.(9)(1^K)
Thank you so much !!

From what I can gather the only question I dropped marks on was QUESTION ONE. How annoying hahah!

Onto M2 now then I'm done with exams !:smile::smile:
Reply 84
Hi arsey, thanks again for the answers, you're amazing. Do you think it matters if I didn't use the word 'communicative' for why AB doesn't equal BA. Instead I talked about the dimensions being different of the outcome matrix


Posted from TSR Mobile
Never revised for this paper ... Never opened the textbook aswell lol .. Other than making a slip and getting induction in last question wrong .. everything else seems good!
Original post by Darnell LD97
For the last question on divisibility by proof by induction I completely messed up and did something weird this is what i did.

f(k)=8^k-2^k
f(k+1)=8^k+1-2^k+1
f(k+1)-f(k)=8^k+1-2^k+1-(8^k-2^k)
=8^k+1-2^k+1-8^k+2^k
=8.(8^k)-2.(2^k)-8^k+2^k
=7.(8^k)-1.(2^k)
=7.8(1^K)-1.2(1^K)
=56(1^K)-2(1^K)
=54(1^K)
=6.(9)(1^K)


HAHAHA I LIKE HOW YOU WROTE 8^k = 8(1^k) ... LOL :wink:
Original post by Mathsforlife
HAHAHA I LIKE HOW YOU WROTE 8^k = 8(1^k) ... LOL :wink:


hahaha yh i panicked lol and i had a lack of focus at this point in the exam, but im not too bothered anyway hopefully I'll get an A in the paper although ill be happy with a B in further maths :smile:
Original post by Locicero
Hi arsey, thanks again for the answers, you're amazing. Do you think it matters if I didn't use the word 'communicative' for why AB doesn't equal BA. Instead I talked about the dimensions being different of the outcome matrix


Posted from TSR Mobile


You mean 'non-commutative'? Lol.
Reply 89
Original post by Arsey
Here are my solutions to the FP1 paper, I thought a few were quite tricky but otherwise a reasonable paper.

I would be expecting boundaries at around the June-12 level.

R and IAL to follow once I get the papers




Session100'90'80'70'60'50'40'
Jun-1375675849413325
Jan-1375706456484134
Jun-1275686153453831
Jan-1275726962554842
Jun-1175696253443628
Jan-1175706457504336
Jun-1075696255484134
Jan-1075706456494235
Jun-0975696355473931
Jan-0975696254463932





The only thing I dont understand is why question 7ii is worth 6 marks. After the exam my friend said she put 6.5 and -6.5, but the wording of the question seemed like it only wanted one answer. Could it have been -6.5??
Original post by Mathsforlife
Never revised for this paper ... Never opened the textbook aswell lol .. Other than making a slip and getting induction in last question wrong .. everything else seems good!


haha similar to me, hadn't done any FP1 work since october till the day before the exam, spent 20 minutes looking at the textbook and that was my revision for this exam :tongue:

did ok though, looking at about 62/75 with these solutions!
Original post by Fas
haha similar to me, hadn't done any FP1 work since october till the day before the exam, spent 20 minutes looking at the textbook and that was my revision for this exam :tongue:

did ok though, looking at about 62/75 with these solutions!


I always thought I could get 100 without revising .. I was wrong bout that .. Because I didn't have exam practice ended up making a error right at the end of the exam! Think I got like 72.
4ii) I multiplied out the matrix instead of leaving it in a neat form = 0 marks?
8b) i got y=6/k = 0 marks?
9) Do I get any marks for doing it correct until starting the n=k+1 bit?
Original post by newguy101
4ii) I multiplied out the matrix instead of leaving it in a neat form = 0 marks?
8b) i got y=6/k = 0 marks?
9) Do I get any marks for doing it correct until starting the n=k+1 bit?


4ii) You'll get all the marks for doing it that way.
8b) You'll probably get a few method marks but I can't tell how many without knowing how you got to that answer. Probably you'll get about a third of the marks.
9) You'll get 1 mark for doing the base case of n=1 correctly, but writing the assumption doesn't get any marks on its own and you won't have got any of the later marks if you could'nt prove it for n=k+1 so you'll get just 1 mark for the final question I'm afraid.

I hope that helps :smile:
Reply 94
Original post by Braddy16
Didn't do as well as I hoped but still looking at an A at least! On Q9 I didn't get to the end of induction, will I get a mark for still putting the right conclusion or is that cheating? :colone:

Posted
from TSR Mobile


I did the same thing
Original post by Geniusguy
4ii) You'll get all the marks for doing it that way.
8b) You'll probably get a few method marks but I can't tell how many without knowing how you got to that answer. Probably you'll get about a third of the marks.
9) You'll get 1 mark for doing the base case of n=1 correctly, but writing the assumption doesn't get any marks on its own and you won't have got any of the later marks if you could'nt prove it for n=k+1 so you'll get just 1 mark for the final question I'm afraid.

I hope that helps :smile:



Thank you buddy, that is helpful
Reply 96
FP1 (R) solutions added. I cannot see an IAL F1 paper, was there one?
Original post by Arsey
FP1 (R) solutions added. I cannot see an IAL F1 paper, was there one?


You wrote FP2 on the FP1 S14 R paper.

F3 IAL was sat yesterday, looked a decent paper to me tbh, hence the F1 IAL is to be sat on 23rd June 2014
Reply 98
What do you think of the R paper? Any predictions for boundaries?
Reply 99
I thought it was significantly more difficult than the UK paper but it was okay. No idea about R boundaries.


Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending