ISIS issue fatwa to kill babies and children with down syndrome.

Nope im just surprised and honestly curious as to why you, personally like this guy.

Joos pls

U r a fan of his too? 🤔

By 'kill them all' what you essentially mean is total genocide of Iraq and Syria and a mass extermination of Muslims across the world in an ongoing world-wide Inquisition. That sounds, difficult, expensive, a little discriminatory and also just a little bit foolish.

Nope, i simply like going around making fun of some white supremacists who honestly have it ingrained in their minds that the Jews are planning a white genocide, hence the name 'joos pls'. But still answer my question as my curiosity can no longer bare this.

Mahmoud rhymes with ur-mum's-a-dude

Coincidence??


I think not🤔

So it is not acceptable to hate Jihadi John?

We do, you apologise for him. You say it is all the West' fault, and your Leader even says he shouldn't have been killed.

You on the left will continue to get attacked until you stop spouting such nonsense.

You are appeasers, like Chamberlain and Daladier.

A "tragedy" that Bin Laden was killed? Mohammed Emwazi should have been brought to trial? Get out of it, Dhimmi.

So it is not acceptable to hate Jihadi John?

We do, you apologise for him. You say it is all the West' fault, and your Leader even says he shouldn't have been killed.

You on the left will continue to get attacked until you stop spouting such nonsense.

You are appeasers, like Chamberlain and Daladier.

A "tragedy" that Bin Laden was killed? Mohammed Emwazi should have been brought to trial? Get out of it, Dhimmi.

Part of me hope it does all go to ****, and by 'it' I mean the UK. Their descendants will pay the ultimate price - a life under religious conservatism, or at the very least a society divided up along ethnic and religious lines - for their traitorous, twisted, illogical, backwards ideology.

Have a look at the second post, or even the OPs history, it's very much a smear on the left. If he cares about babies being killed, why isn't he posting about Boko Haram?
He's using the deaths of babies as a stick to beat the left with and it's disgusting. Yes I am genuinely sad by this, of course, but the idea that dead babies should be used as a stick to beat a political group in the UK with is outrageous.

This is very much a smear thread, to attack the left. The OP doesn't care about dead babies at all, and neither do half the nutjobs on here.

The great majority of Muslims are secular and oppose Isis and terrorism - in fact 30 Muslim counties have just announced a pact to defeat them.I hate extremist Muslims, like jihadi John and while I hate religion, if you practice religion peacefully as the huge majority of Muslims do, then that's acceptable.I hate all religions, including Islam. Tell me, are you outraged that the conservative government of Britain gives huge funding to the Saudis? Are you outraged hat two years ago they funded Isis?

The great majority of Muslims are secular and oppose Isis and terrorism - in fact 30 Muslim counties have just announced a pact to defeat them.

I hate extremist Muslims, like jihadi John and while I hate religion, if you practice religion peacefully as the huge majority of Muslims do, then that's acceptable.

I hate all religions, including Islam. Tell me, are you outraged that the conservative government of Britain gives huge funding to the Saudis? Are you outraged hat two years ago they funded Isis?

I've looked through the first page and the second poster took a shot at the left (I actually rather like that guy tbh though) but there are more individual users almost blaming the West, blaming America or drawing an equivalence between the West and Islamic State and whilst turning this discussion into a left vs right issue is beneath me, I think your perception of which side is the most morally bankrupt is actually a little off.


This is another issue.You moan about right-wing people drawing a false equivalence between opposing airstrikes on Syria and being in favour of Islamic State, ok, that's actually fair. Except, wait, the left does the same thing, when they are draw a false equivalence between a willingness to work with the Saudis and actively supporting Islamic State, just because the house of Saud is Salafi.

'If true...'

Posted from TSR Mobile

Solid banter, will rate 8.2/10.
So why do you support him???

It's not a left v right issue, neither side is more or less morally bankrupt, you have nutters on both sides.

The second poster using dead babies to take a swipe at the left is disgusting.

I reject the premise of your question

Dont run away pls

Is he more or less disgusting than the people who blame America or blame Britain for having a few deals with the Saudis?

What? No one blames Isis on having deals with the Saudis but merely highlights how hypocritical it is to slate Islam and support us funding the Saudis.

What this poster is doing is Trying to use dead babies to show the left support Isis, which just isn't true. You have nutters on both the right and the left. It's not a right v left issue. Again using dead babies as a stick to beat the left with, is disgusting.

I'm going to need some more evidence.