The Student Room Group

Could anyone say what I need to improve on/what marks I'd get for English P1 Q2?

It came on great oiled, resilient, striding legs. It towered thirty feet above half of the trees, a
great evil god, folding its delicate watchmaker’s claws close to its oily reptilian chest. Each
lower leg was a piston, a thousand pounds of white bone, sunk in thick ropes of muscle,
sheathed over in a gleam of pebbled skin like the armour of a terrible warrior. Each thigh
was a ton of meat, ivory, and steel mesh. And from the great breathing cage of the upper
body those two delicate arms dangled out front, arms with hands which might pick up and
examine men like toys, while the snake neck coiled. And the head itself, a ton of sculptured
stone, lifted easily upon the sky. Its mouth gaped, exposing a fence of teeth like daggers.
Its eyes rolled, ostrich eggs, empty of all expression save hunger. It closed its mouth in a
death grin. It ran, its pelvic bones crushing aside trees and bushes, its taloned feet clawing
damp earth, leaving prints six inches deep wherever it settled its weight.

How does the writer use language here to describe the Tyrannosaurus Rex?

You could include the writer’s choice of:
words and phrases
language features and techniques
sentence forms.

The Tyrannosaurus Rex is presented as machine-like and dangerous. A lexical field of mechanics has been used by the writer in describing the T.rex, an example of this is the adjectival phrase 'great oiled, resilient, striding legs.' The adjective 'great oiled' had connotations of machinery and brings to mind the phrase 'like a well oiled machine'. This suggests that the T.Rex should not be seen as an animal by the reader but a contraption, perhaps in order to remove the reader's potential empathy for the beast by throughout the text by enforcing the idea that it is an unfeeling object with no characteristics the reader can identify as human-like in order to empathise with. This compels the reader to view the T.Rex as something exclusively terrifying to us, the reader, as it is shown to have great strength but no warmer qualities to which we could align ourselves with to make it anything other than a destructive machine. Therefore this presents the T.Rex as a threat to the reader in order to create tension but also instills a fear not unalike that which the expedition group would be feeling. This allows us to empathise with the characters and understand Travis' motivations to shoot the beast as we see it as nothing more than vicious and terrifying to us and therefore something that must be gotten rid of for the greater good.

This is further demonstrated through the simile 'pebbled skin like the armour of a terrible warrior' likening the T.Rex's skin to armour. Through this the writer presents the T.Rex as something terrifying to us. Likening the skin of the T.Rex to 'armour' creates a feeling of helplessness for the reader as we begin to understand the strength of the T.Rex and how ill equipped the characters attempting to attack it are in comparison to the beast which possesses an armour which could potentially protect it from any advances the characters were to make rendering them useless. This creates the impression that the T.Rex is invincible therefore forcing the reader to feel compassionate towards the characters as we understand the vulnerability of their situation through the writer's use of language to create a terrifying image of the beast.
Original post by miac16
It came on great oiled, resilient, striding legs. It towered thirty feet above half of the trees, a
great evil god, folding its delicate watchmaker’s claws close to its oily reptilian chest. Each
lower leg was a piston, a thousand pounds of white bone, sunk in thick ropes of muscle,
sheathed over in a gleam of pebbled skin like the armour of a terrible warrior. Each thigh
was a ton of meat, ivory, and steel mesh. And from the great breathing cage of the upper
body those two delicate arms dangled out front, arms with hands which might pick up and
examine men like toys, while the snake neck coiled. And the head itself, a ton of sculptured
stone, lifted easily upon the sky. Its mouth gaped, exposing a fence of teeth like daggers.
Its eyes rolled, ostrich eggs, empty of all expression save hunger. It closed its mouth in a
death grin. It ran, its pelvic bones crushing aside trees and bushes, its taloned feet clawing
damp earth, leaving prints six inches deep wherever it settled its weight.

How does the writer use language here to describe the Tyrannosaurus Rex?

You could include the writer’s choice of:
words and phrases
language features and techniques
sentence forms.

The Tyrannosaurus Rex is presented as machine-like and dangerous. A lexical field of mechanics has been used by the writer in describing the T.rex, an example of this is the adjectival phrase 'great oiled, resilient, striding legs.' The adjective 'great oiled' had connotations of machinery and brings to mind the phrase 'like a well oiled machine'. This suggests that the T.Rex should not be seen as an animal by the reader but a contraption, perhaps in order to remove the reader's potential empathy for the beast by throughout the text by enforcing the idea that it is an unfeeling object with no characteristics the reader can identify as human-like in order to empathise with. This compels the reader to view the T.Rex as something exclusively terrifying to us, the reader, as it is shown to have great strength but no warmer qualities to which we could align ourselves with to make it anything other than a destructive machine. Therefore this presents the T.Rex as a threat to the reader in order to create tension but also instills a fear not unalike that which the expedition group would be feeling. This allows us to empathise with the characters and understand Travis' motivations to shoot the beast as we see it as nothing more than vicious and terrifying to us and therefore something that must be gotten rid of for the greater good.

This is further demonstrated through the simile 'pebbled skin like the armour of a terrible warrior' likening the T.Rex's skin to armour. Through this the writer presents the T.Rex as something terrifying to us. Likening the skin of the T.Rex to 'armour' creates a feeling of helplessness for the reader as we begin to understand the strength of the T.Rex and how ill equipped the characters attempting to attack it are in comparison to the beast which possesses an armour which could potentially protect it from any advances the characters were to make rendering them useless. This creates the impression that the T.Rex is invincible therefore forcing the reader to feel compassionate towards the characters as we understand the vulnerability of their situation through the writer's use of language to create a terrifying image of the beast.

It's not bad, but there's things you can work on. I can't give you an exact mark but I'll give some improvements (as someone who got a grade 9 in Eng Lan 2 years ago):
- this bit is not relevant: mind the phrase 'like a well oiled machine' - you're basically repeating what you said in the earlier part of the sentence. It's also not good to bring this in as it's not clear where this phrase came from. the only phrases you should be bringing in are quotes from the texts which you should then analyse.
- choose higher-level techniques. if you look at my example below you'll see that instead of just picking out adjectives I picked out the rule of three technique (aka a tricolon; aka when you have three adjectives grouped together)
- don't just use one quote per paragraph. for these short-answer questions in the eng lang paper you obviously don't have much time but have quite a bit to write. just scatter in as many quotes as you can (within reason) and quickly analyse them and then move on. Mr Bruff's English Language videos on youtube for every question number are very good at showing how you do this in the example answers he writes. using more than one quote per paragraph (even if its just one or two or three words per quote) is something you should start doing in any English essay, even on the literature side.

Also, the analysis especially in the second paragaph has lots of good ideas and it's good how you referred back to the reader.

Here's the beginning of a relatively high-level answer I wrote:
The writer describes the T-Rex as intimidating and powerful. This is established from the very beginning of the extract when the writer describes the creature’s “great oiled, resilient, striding legs”, using the rule of three. ‘Striding’ emphasises the confidence the T-Rex moves with, a product of its might and dominance in the forest. Its influence in this environment can be seen further by its description as having ‘a thousand pounds of white bone’. By quantifying its weight, the writer exaggerates how huge it is, foreshadowing to the reader the damage it will cause as it exerts its force, seen later on in this extract by how ‘its pelvic bones crushing aside trees and bushes’. The use of the present continuous verb ‘crushing’ highlights its strength by giving the reader the impression that this is a repetitive, ongoing motion as opposed to a one-off occurrence, which is further emphasised by explicitly mentioning how it is both trees and bushes which are being crushed. Alongside the T-Rex’s power being emphasised, the reader is told that this is something to fear through the creature ‘exposing a fence of teeth like daggers’. The metaphor of ‘fence’ conveys the size of the teeth, creating fear in the reader. Meanwhile, the simile of them being like ‘daggers’ not only references their sharpness but also paints the creature as particularly dangerous to the reader due to the fact that this object is specifically used to cause harm to humans.
Reply 2
The author uses language to describe the Tyrannosaurus rex . An example of this is when the author uses the rule of 3 to describe how unconquerable and dominant the T-Rex is. A quotation that demonstrates this is,”It came on great oiled, resilient, striding legs,” The use of the words ‘great oiled,resilient,striding legs,’ shows us that it’s a beast that ruled the world and that it’s powerful hence why the author named it ‘a great evil god.’ Another example on how the author uses language to describe the Tyrannosaurus. Is when the writer uses a metaphor in the phrase,”The head itself, a ton of sculptured stone.” By using these words the author has made it obvious that this creature was handmade and you can see each crevasse of its head. In addition, the word ,‘sculptured stone,’ gives off the idea that the head itself weighs a ton and must be painful for any other animal.Contrastingly, the author also adds a bit of humor when talking about this magnificent creature and also makes fun of it a bit. This idea is expressed in the following quotation: “Those two delicate arms dangled out front,”Here the author displays that among this beast there are weaknesses and that it is not all muscular and indestructible by using humor . The word ‘delicate’ suggests that it can be easily damaged. The writer's intention was to show people how ruling the Trex was at that time and that it was the more superior species also that everyone has a weakness even the best of the best

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending