Thank you so much! May I know how you answered what your controversial view was? I'm kinda intrigued by this question haha,,, I also didn't know that they would send you the case about a week back, I thought the pre-reading would be 30 minutes but I guess it depends from college to college 😀 I've been assigned Hertford and the tutors seem lovely!
I mentioned contract law and a MOOC in the PS, and I'm planning to watch a documentary on a famous case related to it, hopefully, that should be enough? I guess I can also say I'm interested in Human rights Law cause I've been following the Afghanistan and Palestine situation in depth.
Thank you for the reassurance once again! One of the key skills they are looking for is separating the relevant from the irrelevant and I'm scared I might just start blabbering ********. I saw this question, 'Should students get a partial/full refund from universities if classes are held online?' and my response was no, because the university is a service you're paying for, and you wouldn't pay a doctor less for their service just because it's online. However, I was told that the better response would be to consider the university/lecturers as well as the students' POV. In such a case, how do you think I should go about answering?
(I'm sorry for asking so many questions, but I'd be very grateful for your response
)