The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

There's no "best college for X subject" as such. If you're trying to narrow down the colleges, it might be better to look at the tutors' specialisms and see which tutors match your interests. Even that's not important though.

I'd advise looking at non-academic things. When I was looking at colleges, I looked at things like which would offer accomodation for the whole of the course, which had extra bursaries, location, etc. Stuff like that. So I narrowed it down and my sister said Worcester was worth a look. So I went to the open day, saw the 'Pride and Prejudice'-esque buildings and was like :love:
I would say apply to the college you like best. I doubt there will be much variation in teaching between colleges because all the modules etc are standardized. My friend is loving LMH.

About reading, i suggest you have a look at interests of the tutors that will interview you and read a bit around that.
T-o dore
I would say apply to the college you like best. I doubt there will be much variation in teaching between colleges because all the modules etc are standardized. My friend is loving LMH.

About reading, i suggest you have a look at interests of the tutors that will interview you and read a bit around that.


This

Thankfully I knew one of the tutors at my college was a specialist in ideology, and another in gender history, so I made sure I could ask any related questions about that (and in both cases the topics came up).
Reply 4
harvard college
Jordan.
Reply 6
Rougir_M
I've been advised to apply to Oxbridge to read English, however, I'm struggling to get an idea of what colleges are best for the subject as the lists are so long.

If anyone could help me with this I would be very grateful.
Also, are there any recommended reads that would score brownie points?

Thanks again. :smile:


Why are you thinking about colleges when you haven't even picked a university... ? You do know the courses are pretty different, don't you? I love the Cambridge course, but the Oxford one looked to me like the most boring thing in the world. :p:

There is no "best" college for English - there are more competitive colleges, or ones that get more firsts, but there's no definitive "English" college. Have a browse through websites and go to Open days if you want to find out more about them.

As for brownie points... just read. Lots. Doesn't matter what it is, really, so long as you can talk about it intelligently and demonstrate flexibility of thought.
Reply 7
Lidka
Why are you thinking about colleges when you haven't even picked a university... ? You do know the courses are pretty different, don't you? I love the Cambridge course, but the Oxford one looked to me like the most boring thing in the world. :p:


i remember you saying this exact thing to me last year :p:

she is, of course, lying. the answer is exeter college, oxford.
Reply 8
Read Kafka.
Reply 9
skagitup
i remember you saying this exact thing to me last year :p:

she is, of course, lying. the answer is exeter college, oxford.


That's because it's true: I do think the Oxford course is boring. :p:
ABF
Read Kafka.


Kafka isn't English literature, He was an Austrian Jew.
Reply 11
Andy the Anarchist
Kafka isn't English literature, He was an Austrian Jew.

Still, it's literature. Most lovely to read aswell.

And it's under-rated/people are under-exposed to it.
Andy the Anarchist
Kafka isn't English literature, He was an Austrian Jew.


Yeah, everybody knows Jews aren't allowed in the canon.
ABF
Still, it's literature. Most lovely to read aswell.

And it's under-rated/people are under-exposed to it.


It's literature fine, and excellent literature at that. It's just not "English Literature" per se
Reply 14
One could argue that Chaucer isn't in English either, yet that's still studied.
Reply 15
ABF
One could argue that Chaucer isn't in English either, yet that's still studied.

:confused:
Or are you trying to be facetious and argue that medieval English ≠ proper English?
ABF
One could argue that Chaucer isn't in English either ...


I wouldn't argue with F.M.B.
My point was that "English literature" presumably involves the study of works of literature which were originally written in English (hence the "English literature" as opposed to "literature" title). Thus works by authors whose works were originally not in English (Dostoevsky, Kafka) would be excluded. There seems little sense in an "English" course, which focuses heavily on the English language and its respective literature, including foreign texts.

Or is that me just being pedantic?
Reply 18
Andy the Anarchist
My point was that "English literature" presumably involves the study of works of literature which were originally written in English (hence the "English literature" as opposed to "literature" title). Thus works by authors whose works were originally not in English (Dostoevsky, Kafka) would be excluded. There seems little sense in an "English" course, which focuses heavily on the English language and its respective literature, including foreign texts.

Or is that me just being pedantic?


I would say so, yes.

A course that kept exclusively to works written and published in England would be... not one I would want to study, at any rate.
Lidka
I would say so, yes.

A course that kept exclusively to works written and published in England would be... not one I would want to study, at any rate.


Surely it doesnt have to be english as in the nationality, rather just english as in the language. So american authors are ok etc.

Latest

Trending

Trending